News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Fate of Alameda Pot Club Likely Heading to Court |
Title: | US CA: Fate of Alameda Pot Club Likely Heading to Court |
Published On: | 2009-05-23 |
Source: | San Jose Mercury News (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2009-05-25 15:33:20 |
FATE OF ALAMEDA POT CLUB LIKELY HEADING TO COURT
ALAMEDA -- The City Council may have moved to close the Purple
Elephant, the medical marijuana dispensary on Webster Street, but that
does not mean the business will be going away any time soon.
Instead, the pot club's fate likely will be decided in
court.
Attorney Edward Higginbotham, who represents the club's owner, called
the decision Tuesday to uphold the revocation of the dispensary's
business license "blatantly unconstitutional."
"I don't know if you could get away with it in North Korea,"
Higginbotham said. "But you certainly can't get away with it in the
United States."
Higginbotham said he now plans to file a writ of mandate in Alameda
County Superior Court to reverse the decision.
He also said he was prepared to file a restraining order if
authorities tried to close the Purple Elephant's doors as the case
played out in court.
City officials decided to close the dispensary in December, saying
that owner Luke Coleman misled them when he described the business as
"miscellaneous retail" on the application. The club opened in July.
Coleman declined to comment on the revocation, citing his attorney's
advice.
Kathy Moehring of the West Alameda Business Association accused him of
"an omission of truth" in the application.
"It was to allow them to come in under the radar," Moehring
said.
Rob Ratto, executive director of the Park Street Business Association,
said the owner knew he would meet opposition if he openly announced he
was opening a marijuana dispensary.
"He chose to circumvent the process by putting down 'miscellaneous
retail' when he knows that this type of business is controversial in
the city of Alameda," Ratto said.
But Robert Raich, who has litigated medical marijuana cases before the
U.S. Supreme Court, said not fully describing the business was typical
on pot club applications.
Otherwise, authorities would move to shut them down, Raich
said.
"You're not saying anything that's dishonest, but you are also not
volunteering information that will come back and bite you," he said.
The move to pull the license followed the City Council approving a
moratorium on pot clubs as a land use, saying it wanted to study how
the clubs affect people's health and safety. The moratorium is in
effect until June 2010.
Higginbotham accused city officials of denying his client due process
when they pulled the license.
Club users told the council Tuesday that the business provided a vital
medical service and urged that it remain open.
But Councilman Doug deHaan said the council was voting on whether the
revocation was justified and not on the merits of medical marijuana.
ALAMEDA -- The City Council may have moved to close the Purple
Elephant, the medical marijuana dispensary on Webster Street, but that
does not mean the business will be going away any time soon.
Instead, the pot club's fate likely will be decided in
court.
Attorney Edward Higginbotham, who represents the club's owner, called
the decision Tuesday to uphold the revocation of the dispensary's
business license "blatantly unconstitutional."
"I don't know if you could get away with it in North Korea,"
Higginbotham said. "But you certainly can't get away with it in the
United States."
Higginbotham said he now plans to file a writ of mandate in Alameda
County Superior Court to reverse the decision.
He also said he was prepared to file a restraining order if
authorities tried to close the Purple Elephant's doors as the case
played out in court.
City officials decided to close the dispensary in December, saying
that owner Luke Coleman misled them when he described the business as
"miscellaneous retail" on the application. The club opened in July.
Coleman declined to comment on the revocation, citing his attorney's
advice.
Kathy Moehring of the West Alameda Business Association accused him of
"an omission of truth" in the application.
"It was to allow them to come in under the radar," Moehring
said.
Rob Ratto, executive director of the Park Street Business Association,
said the owner knew he would meet opposition if he openly announced he
was opening a marijuana dispensary.
"He chose to circumvent the process by putting down 'miscellaneous
retail' when he knows that this type of business is controversial in
the city of Alameda," Ratto said.
But Robert Raich, who has litigated medical marijuana cases before the
U.S. Supreme Court, said not fully describing the business was typical
on pot club applications.
Otherwise, authorities would move to shut them down, Raich
said.
"You're not saying anything that's dishonest, but you are also not
volunteering information that will come back and bite you," he said.
The move to pull the license followed the City Council approving a
moratorium on pot clubs as a land use, saying it wanted to study how
the clubs affect people's health and safety. The moratorium is in
effect until June 2010.
Higginbotham accused city officials of denying his client due process
when they pulled the license.
Club users told the council Tuesday that the business provided a vital
medical service and urged that it remain open.
But Councilman Doug deHaan said the council was voting on whether the
revocation was justified and not on the merits of medical marijuana.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...