News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Edu: Editorial: Pro: Looking Past the Haze |
Title: | US CA: Edu: Editorial: Pro: Looking Past the Haze |
Published On: | 2009-04-15 |
Source: | Pierce College Roundup (CA Edu) |
Fetched On: | 2009-05-15 03:13:15 |
PRO: LOOKING PAST THE HAZE
Taxing marijuana could bring in billions of dollars to aid the country's
economy
For decades, the United States and the world have sought to stem the tide
of illegal drugs. From marijuana to cocaine, the U.S. has been in a bitter
and losing battle against drugs.
While the war on drugs should continue, there are some substances that
almost seem pointless to bar from the public.
One of these drugs is marijuana, a substance that has been in use long
before it was discovered by the Western world.
To understand why marijuana should be legal, we must understand why it is
illegal.
It was not initially criminalized due to scientific reasons. The reasons
for marijuana being an illegal substance were founded on sensationalist
stories, irresponsible journalism and a crusade led by the Bureau of
Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD).
During the 1930s, when the marijuana scare began, many newspapers fueled
the fire of fear by editorializing about marijuana without doing adequate
research. One of these publications was the San Francisco Examiner.
The Examiner asserted, in the 1930s, that "Hasheesh (sic) makes a murderer
who kills for the love of killing out of the mildest mannered man who ever
laughed at the idea that any habit could ever get him..."
It's safe to say that the risks of marijuana do not include ravaging the
first person a user comes in contact with.
BNDD continued with sensationalist allegations on the effects of
marijuana. Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of BNDD from 1930 to 1962,
used openly racist remarks to justify outlawing his case for illegalizing
pot.
Anslinger claimed in 1937 that ".marijuana causes white women to seek
sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."
Furthermore, considering the state of the economy, making marijuana legal
would possibly benefit California, if not the nation.
Imagine if marijuana was taxed in the same manner as cigarettes.
The Illinois General Assembly is currently seeking to increase the tax on
cigarettes, using the money to generate $1 billion toward state health
programs.
Marijuana could be taxed in the same way. The income generated could be
used to benefit various state programs that are in need.
If the state government taxed marijuana at the same rate as alcohol and
tobacco, it would bring in an estimated $6.2 billion annually.
The United States would also save copious amounts of money by halting the
arrests and incarcerations of marijuana users.
According to Jeffrey Miron, a Harvard economics professor, the federal
government would save an estimated $7.7 billion a year if it didn't spend
funds on policing the drug. Together, that would save the government $13.9
billion.
The same constraints could be placed on marijuana as are placed on
alcohol, such as age restrictions, limits on locations for usage and a
redefinition of laws involving "driving under the influence."
Couple these regulations with the benefit of taxing the product and it
seems ludicrous to demonize marijuana.
Even with marijuana being illegal, there are no shortages in cheating the
laws to get a hold of some.
Why not just create rules and regulations?
Why not have the taxes pumping money back into the economy?
Why not stop the money being spent on a feudal fight against a
black-market marijuana trade?
Taxing marijuana could bring in billions of dollars to aid the country's
economy
For decades, the United States and the world have sought to stem the tide
of illegal drugs. From marijuana to cocaine, the U.S. has been in a bitter
and losing battle against drugs.
While the war on drugs should continue, there are some substances that
almost seem pointless to bar from the public.
One of these drugs is marijuana, a substance that has been in use long
before it was discovered by the Western world.
To understand why marijuana should be legal, we must understand why it is
illegal.
It was not initially criminalized due to scientific reasons. The reasons
for marijuana being an illegal substance were founded on sensationalist
stories, irresponsible journalism and a crusade led by the Bureau of
Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD).
During the 1930s, when the marijuana scare began, many newspapers fueled
the fire of fear by editorializing about marijuana without doing adequate
research. One of these publications was the San Francisco Examiner.
The Examiner asserted, in the 1930s, that "Hasheesh (sic) makes a murderer
who kills for the love of killing out of the mildest mannered man who ever
laughed at the idea that any habit could ever get him..."
It's safe to say that the risks of marijuana do not include ravaging the
first person a user comes in contact with.
BNDD continued with sensationalist allegations on the effects of
marijuana. Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of BNDD from 1930 to 1962,
used openly racist remarks to justify outlawing his case for illegalizing
pot.
Anslinger claimed in 1937 that ".marijuana causes white women to seek
sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."
Furthermore, considering the state of the economy, making marijuana legal
would possibly benefit California, if not the nation.
Imagine if marijuana was taxed in the same manner as cigarettes.
The Illinois General Assembly is currently seeking to increase the tax on
cigarettes, using the money to generate $1 billion toward state health
programs.
Marijuana could be taxed in the same way. The income generated could be
used to benefit various state programs that are in need.
If the state government taxed marijuana at the same rate as alcohol and
tobacco, it would bring in an estimated $6.2 billion annually.
The United States would also save copious amounts of money by halting the
arrests and incarcerations of marijuana users.
According to Jeffrey Miron, a Harvard economics professor, the federal
government would save an estimated $7.7 billion a year if it didn't spend
funds on policing the drug. Together, that would save the government $13.9
billion.
The same constraints could be placed on marijuana as are placed on
alcohol, such as age restrictions, limits on locations for usage and a
redefinition of laws involving "driving under the influence."
Couple these regulations with the benefit of taxing the product and it
seems ludicrous to demonize marijuana.
Even with marijuana being illegal, there are no shortages in cheating the
laws to get a hold of some.
Why not just create rules and regulations?
Why not have the taxes pumping money back into the economy?
Why not stop the money being spent on a feudal fight against a
black-market marijuana trade?
Member Comments |
No member comments available...