News (Media Awareness Project) - US CO: Editorial: US Should Put An End To War On Drugs |
Title: | US CO: Editorial: US Should Put An End To War On Drugs |
Published On: | 2009-04-21 |
Source: | Denver Post (CO) |
Fetched On: | 2009-04-22 02:06:31 |
U.S. SHOULD PUT AN END TO WAR ON DRUGS, LEGALIZE POT
The decades-old drug war is an expensive failure. It's time to
decriminalize marijuana and regulate it the same as alcohol.
Though the hazy spectacle pot smokers created Monday -- and that they
create each April 20 at 4:20 p.m. -- grabbed some media attention, it
probably did little to advance their cause of legalizing marijuana.
This country has waged an expensive and ineffective "war on drugs,"
including marijuana, for decades, and it's high time (to rather
predictably borrow a phrase) that the debate on whether to
decriminalize cannabis reached the halls of Congress.
Interestingly, it's not just the dope smokers in the park calling for
legalized marijuana use. Conservative, progressive and libertarian
intellectuals alike have argued that we ought to legalize marijuana.
The Post's editorial board has long called for an end to the war on pot.
Our opinion meshes, in this instance, with that of the late
conservative writer William F. Buckley Jr., who once argued that "the
government should treat marijuana more or less the same way it treats
alcohol: It should regulate it, control it, tax it, and make it
illegal only for children."
President Barack Obama has requested more than $14 billion to fund
the drug war at the federal level in 2009. State and local
enforcement costs drive that figure far higher.
Year after year, a few hundred thousand people end up in court and
prison as a result of drug crimes. Our overcrowded prisons are just
one reason to take another look at some of our drug laws.
Granted, there are still many dangerous drugs out there. Highly
addictive drugs like methamphetamine or crack cocaine swept through
our nation's cities and suburbs and rural communities like epidemics.
But legions of studies have shown that marijuana isn't addictive.
And as recent U.S. presidents have shown, use of the drug, even when
inhaled, doesn't in and of itself ruin a person's chance at achieving
full and productive lives. Yes, pot users face risks as potentially
as devastating as other drugs. So do drinkers of wine and beer.
But regulating the drug, as alcoholic beverages are regulated, can
provide for prevention and therapy, while also starving the criminal
element from this cash stream.
Marijuana also could be taxed, with the money earmarked to fund
treatment programs for victims of truly dangerous drugs.
We did not support the successful effort to legalize minor marijuana
possession in Denver, and we have not supported statewide ballot
efforts to legalize the drug. The problem with local laws is that
they conflict with federal laws and create legal headaches that
further muck up the courts and jam prisons.
But our elected federal representatives could change all that. And they should.
The decades-old drug war is an expensive failure. It's time to
decriminalize marijuana and regulate it the same as alcohol.
Though the hazy spectacle pot smokers created Monday -- and that they
create each April 20 at 4:20 p.m. -- grabbed some media attention, it
probably did little to advance their cause of legalizing marijuana.
This country has waged an expensive and ineffective "war on drugs,"
including marijuana, for decades, and it's high time (to rather
predictably borrow a phrase) that the debate on whether to
decriminalize cannabis reached the halls of Congress.
Interestingly, it's not just the dope smokers in the park calling for
legalized marijuana use. Conservative, progressive and libertarian
intellectuals alike have argued that we ought to legalize marijuana.
The Post's editorial board has long called for an end to the war on pot.
Our opinion meshes, in this instance, with that of the late
conservative writer William F. Buckley Jr., who once argued that "the
government should treat marijuana more or less the same way it treats
alcohol: It should regulate it, control it, tax it, and make it
illegal only for children."
President Barack Obama has requested more than $14 billion to fund
the drug war at the federal level in 2009. State and local
enforcement costs drive that figure far higher.
Year after year, a few hundred thousand people end up in court and
prison as a result of drug crimes. Our overcrowded prisons are just
one reason to take another look at some of our drug laws.
Granted, there are still many dangerous drugs out there. Highly
addictive drugs like methamphetamine or crack cocaine swept through
our nation's cities and suburbs and rural communities like epidemics.
But legions of studies have shown that marijuana isn't addictive.
And as recent U.S. presidents have shown, use of the drug, even when
inhaled, doesn't in and of itself ruin a person's chance at achieving
full and productive lives. Yes, pot users face risks as potentially
as devastating as other drugs. So do drinkers of wine and beer.
But regulating the drug, as alcoholic beverages are regulated, can
provide for prevention and therapy, while also starving the criminal
element from this cash stream.
Marijuana also could be taxed, with the money earmarked to fund
treatment programs for victims of truly dangerous drugs.
We did not support the successful effort to legalize minor marijuana
possession in Denver, and we have not supported statewide ballot
efforts to legalize the drug. The problem with local laws is that
they conflict with federal laws and create legal headaches that
further muck up the courts and jam prisons.
But our elected federal representatives could change all that. And they should.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...