News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Group: Fix Alleged Misstatements on Medical Pot |
Title: | US CA: Group: Fix Alleged Misstatements on Medical Pot |
Published On: | 2009-04-15 |
Source: | San Francisco Chronicle (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2009-04-16 01:48:06 |
GROUP: FIX ALLEGED MISSTATEMENTS ON MEDICAL POT
A medical marijuana advocacy group and the Obama administration
argued Tuesday before a federal appeals court in San Francisco over a
private citizen's right to force the government to correct alleged
misstatements - in this case, about the therapeutic properties of pot.
Americans for Safe Access filed suit in San Francisco two years ago
under the Information Quality Act, a federal law that allows members
of the public to "seek and obtain correction" of false or misleading
government information that affects them.
The organization said its members include seriously ill people who
had been discouraged from using marijuana by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services' long-standing position that the drug has
no medical value. The department declined to respond to the suit,
saying the Drug Enforcement Administration was still considering the
advocacy group's 2002 request to reconsider the status of marijuana.
On Tuesday, a Justice Department lawyer told the Ninth U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals that the law allowing private citizens to seek
correction of government misinformation can't be enforced in court.
Congress created "no judicially enforceable rights" when it passed
the Information Quality Act in 2000, said attorney Alisa Klein. She
said the law requires only that a federal agency review such requests
from members of the public; otherwise, she said, courts would be
flooded with demands to second-guess government decisions on
countless subjects.
The government's position would make the law meaningless, argued Alan
Morrison, the lawyer for Americans for Safe Access. Although some
disputes are too subjective for court intervention, he said, others
can be measured objectively - for example, "two plus two is four and
not five" - and the law gives judges a role in keeping the government on track.
Members of the three-judge panel seemed torn.
"The statute is amazing and troubling," said Judge Marsha Berzon. But
she told Klein that the law appears to allow people affected by
government misinformation to get it corrected, under court order if necessary.
Federal law classifies marijuana among the most harmful drugs, with
no legitimate use, but allows the DEA to ease restrictions based on
new scientific evidence. Americans for Safe Access asked the DEA to
reclassify marijuana during President George W. Bush's
administration, and - after getting no response - asked the
Department of Health and Human Services to correct its alleged
misstatements under the Information Quality Act.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco dismissed the suit
in November 2007, saying the law did not require any action by the
department. The advocacy group wants the appeals court to reinstate
the case and order the department to respond to its complaint.
A medical marijuana advocacy group and the Obama administration
argued Tuesday before a federal appeals court in San Francisco over a
private citizen's right to force the government to correct alleged
misstatements - in this case, about the therapeutic properties of pot.
Americans for Safe Access filed suit in San Francisco two years ago
under the Information Quality Act, a federal law that allows members
of the public to "seek and obtain correction" of false or misleading
government information that affects them.
The organization said its members include seriously ill people who
had been discouraged from using marijuana by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services' long-standing position that the drug has
no medical value. The department declined to respond to the suit,
saying the Drug Enforcement Administration was still considering the
advocacy group's 2002 request to reconsider the status of marijuana.
On Tuesday, a Justice Department lawyer told the Ninth U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals that the law allowing private citizens to seek
correction of government misinformation can't be enforced in court.
Congress created "no judicially enforceable rights" when it passed
the Information Quality Act in 2000, said attorney Alisa Klein. She
said the law requires only that a federal agency review such requests
from members of the public; otherwise, she said, courts would be
flooded with demands to second-guess government decisions on
countless subjects.
The government's position would make the law meaningless, argued Alan
Morrison, the lawyer for Americans for Safe Access. Although some
disputes are too subjective for court intervention, he said, others
can be measured objectively - for example, "two plus two is four and
not five" - and the law gives judges a role in keeping the government on track.
Members of the three-judge panel seemed torn.
"The statute is amazing and troubling," said Judge Marsha Berzon. But
she told Klein that the law appears to allow people affected by
government misinformation to get it corrected, under court order if necessary.
Federal law classifies marijuana among the most harmful drugs, with
no legitimate use, but allows the DEA to ease restrictions based on
new scientific evidence. Americans for Safe Access asked the DEA to
reclassify marijuana during President George W. Bush's
administration, and - after getting no response - asked the
Department of Health and Human Services to correct its alleged
misstatements under the Information Quality Act.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco dismissed the suit
in November 2007, saying the law did not require any action by the
department. The advocacy group wants the appeals court to reinstate
the case and order the department to respond to its complaint.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...