News (Media Awareness Project) - US NY: Editorial: Medical Marijuana |
Title: | US NY: Editorial: Medical Marijuana |
Published On: | 2009-03-21 |
Source: | Watertown Daily Times (NY) |
Fetched On: | 2009-03-22 00:14:28 |
MEDICAL MARIJUANA
A Sensible Approach On Federal Policy
The decision by the Obama administration to refrain from pursuing
state-approved medical marijuana dispensaries is a reasonable shift
in drug policy. It should allow the federal government to redirect
limited resources against traffickers and distributors of more
dangerous drugs.
Marijuana is illegal under federal law. However, California became
the first state in 1995 to permit its medical use to alleviate pain
for sufferers of chronic diseases. A dozen other states have
followed suit with similar legislation, setting up a confrontation
with federal laws.
The Clinton and Bush administrations insisted federal law and
prosecution pre-empted state laws. Court challenges culminated in a
2001 Supreme Court ruling upholding the Justice Department's right
to prosecute sellers of marijuana meant for medical use.
Opponents of using medical marijuana object that it is a gateway
drug that can lead to more dangerous, addictive drugs. They also
challenge the research on the efficacy of marijuana and fear that
medical marijuana dispensaries can become fronts for illegal trade.
Attorney General Eric Holder, however, has changed directions. He
said the administration will no longer raid dispensaries
indiscriminately. The focus, he said, "will be on people,
organizations that are growing, cultivating substantial amounts of
marijuana and doing so in a way that's inconsistent with federal and
state law."
Medical-marijuana dispensers operating within state laws will not be
chased by the Justice Department. Those selling to minors will be
prosecuted, as will people with bogus prescriptions using the laws
as a shield for illegal activity.
Mr. Holder's decision is being hailed by civil libertarians,
medical-marijuana activists and states which saw the laws as a
matter of states' rights. In many states, possession of minor
amounts of marijuana is ignored or a noncriminal violation that
results in a small fine.
But other steps need to be taken at the federal and state levels.
Research is under way, and it should be continued with controlled
studies to determine the therapeutic value of marijuana in giving
comfort to patients.
States have won a political victory. Now, it is up to them to follow
through by exercising their states' rights to enact strict controls
- - from regulating the supply and prescribing of marijuana to
overseeing dispensaries to prevent laws from being abused.
A Sensible Approach On Federal Policy
The decision by the Obama administration to refrain from pursuing
state-approved medical marijuana dispensaries is a reasonable shift
in drug policy. It should allow the federal government to redirect
limited resources against traffickers and distributors of more
dangerous drugs.
Marijuana is illegal under federal law. However, California became
the first state in 1995 to permit its medical use to alleviate pain
for sufferers of chronic diseases. A dozen other states have
followed suit with similar legislation, setting up a confrontation
with federal laws.
The Clinton and Bush administrations insisted federal law and
prosecution pre-empted state laws. Court challenges culminated in a
2001 Supreme Court ruling upholding the Justice Department's right
to prosecute sellers of marijuana meant for medical use.
Opponents of using medical marijuana object that it is a gateway
drug that can lead to more dangerous, addictive drugs. They also
challenge the research on the efficacy of marijuana and fear that
medical marijuana dispensaries can become fronts for illegal trade.
Attorney General Eric Holder, however, has changed directions. He
said the administration will no longer raid dispensaries
indiscriminately. The focus, he said, "will be on people,
organizations that are growing, cultivating substantial amounts of
marijuana and doing so in a way that's inconsistent with federal and
state law."
Medical-marijuana dispensers operating within state laws will not be
chased by the Justice Department. Those selling to minors will be
prosecuted, as will people with bogus prescriptions using the laws
as a shield for illegal activity.
Mr. Holder's decision is being hailed by civil libertarians,
medical-marijuana activists and states which saw the laws as a
matter of states' rights. In many states, possession of minor
amounts of marijuana is ignored or a noncriminal violation that
results in a small fine.
But other steps need to be taken at the federal and state levels.
Research is under way, and it should be continued with controlled
studies to determine the therapeutic value of marijuana in giving
comfort to patients.
States have won a political victory. Now, it is up to them to follow
through by exercising their states' rights to enact strict controls
- - from regulating the supply and prescribing of marijuana to
overseeing dispensaries to prevent laws from being abused.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...