IT'S HIGH TIME TO LEGALIZE CALIFORNIA POT

Habitual use of marijuana may be a dumb thing to do, but really, is
it any dumber, or more harmful, than abusing liquor or smoking
cancer-causing cigarettes?

The difference, of course, is that while possession of marijuana in
small amounts is no more illegal than a traffic infraction, selling
it can be a serious crime. And those who sell it and those who commit
other crimes to buy it represent a significant portion of those
locked in California's very overcrowded prisons.

Isn't it time to recognize that the war on this particular
recreational drug is an abject failure, costing taxpayers many
millions of dollars each year? Wouldn't it be smarter to legalize
marijuana - which may be the state's largest single agricultural
crop, estimated at $14 billion a year - and tax its sale to adults
much as we do liquor and cigarettes?

Yes, says first-term San Francisco Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, who on
Monday announced introduction of legislation that would do exactly
that, flanked by representatives of drug law reform groups.

Legalization of marijuana would save countless millions, perhaps
billions, of dollars in law enforcement, court and prison costs each
year while pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into the state
treasury. What's not to like?

"It is simply nonsensical that California's largest agricultural
industry is completely unregulated and untaxed," Aaron Smith, policy
director for the Marijuana Policy Project California, said in a
statement accompanying Ammiano's announcement. "With our state in an
ongoing fiscal crisis - and no one believes the new budget is the end
of California's financial woes - it's time to bring this major piece
of our economy into the light of day."

This is not exactly a revolutionary step, more like an evolutionary
one. The Legislature decriminalized possession of small amounts of
marijuana for personal use more than 30 years ago. Our voters have
given their blessing to allowing sufferers from certain diseases to
use the drug as a pain reliever.

Who would oppose further legalization? Guardians of the public
morals, of course, but mostly, those now engaged in the drug wars -
law enforcement organizations and their support lobbies on one side
and the marijuana growers themselves on the other.

Legalization would mean a loss of funds for the drug strike teams,
the undercover operatives and other police units on one side, thus
forcing them to concentrate on real crimes. And legalization would
cut into the enormous untaxed profits that the growers now realize,
since making it a legal crop would probably reduce prices.

The nation legalized liquor after its failed experiment with
prohibition in the 1920s. Bootlegging had become a lucrative trade
that established the Mafia as a national crime syndicate, one that
expanded into other fields, including drugs, after prohibition ended.
The bottom line is that marijuana should be legalized for the same reason.