News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: Column: Illicit Drugs Should Be Legal, Officer Says |
Title: | CN BC: Column: Illicit Drugs Should Be Legal, Officer Says |
Published On: | 2008-11-28 |
Source: | Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-11-28 15:21:56 |
ILLICIT DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGAL, OFFICER SAYS
David Bratzer and I share at least one opinion in common: That it
costs us a pointless fortune to maintain the charade of having
effective drug laws in Canada.
It's no big deal that I hold that opinion. Anyone who knows the kind
of things I write about wouldn't be too surprised to discover I'm of
the belief that Canada and the U.S. have made a complete hash of
things by treating a health and social issue like a criminal matter.
But Bratzer holding that opinion, that's a little different. He's a
Victoria police officer -- one of those tasked with enforcing those
laws.
I suspect there are many more who think like Bratzer inside the
department, as you would expect from anyone charged with patrolling
Victoria's ridiculous streets for any length of time. But it's still
not a view that's expressed publicly by police very often.
In fact, Bratzer, a constable, is one of only two active police
officers in Canada who does public speaking on behalf of the
U.S.-based non-profit organization Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
(LEAP). He signed on three months ago after clearing it with his boss,
and now aims to put some of his off hours to use speaking to people
about why drug prohibition doesn't work.
"LEAP's position is that a lot of the problems we're seeing aren't
caused by drugs, but rather the unintended consequences of drug
prohibition," says Bratzer, citing public health problems, violence
and a gang-controlled drug market as examples.
Bratzer came to the same conclusion after three years of policing the
streets of Victoria.
"The effort that we put into chasing drugs -- it's bottomless," he
says. "Canadians have put billions and billions into fighting the war
on drugs, but at the end of the day they're cheaper, more potent and
more available than ever before."
Wanting an end to prohibition has nothing to do with liking drug
abuse, notes Bratzer. But ceding control of an arbitrary assortment of
drugs to gangs and criminals simply isn't working as a strategy. The
LEAP website ( www.leap.cc ) tracks U.S. "drug war" spending by the
minute; at $2,000 every 60 seconds, spending for 2008 is already more
than $46 billion.
Canada doesn't officially have a war on drugs, with federal
authorities preferring to describe our efforts as "demand and
availability reduction." We're not quite so jail-crazy, nor so prone
to lock up people indefinitely at great cost and to little effect.
But we still spend a heck of a lot on drug enforcement in Canada --
more than half a billion dollars a year. And if the goal of all that
spending is to wipe out trafficking and the use of illegal drugs, then
anyone with eyes and 15 minutes to hang out in the downtown can see
that it's not working.
"The LEAP strategy is to build a bureau of speakers modelled on
Vietnam Vets Against the War. That group was effective because they
had the credibility of having been there," says Bratzer. "What LEAP
believes is that once people hear from those in law enforcement about
the multiple harms caused by drug prohibition, they'll change their
minds."
Bratzer is careful to point out that his views are his own, and not
those of the Victoria Police Department. He also stresses that the
solutions lie in slow, measured steps that remove drug laws and
replace them with good public policy.
"I don't support drug abuse, and I don't support breaking the law. I
know it all has to be about baby steps," says Bratzer. "My message to
the marijuana lobby is to aim higher, because if marijuana becomes
legal but all the others remain the way they are, there's still a lot
of harm being done."
Bratzer's view is that "soft" drugs should be taxed and sold, similar
to alcohol and tobacco. Harder drugs such as cocaine and heroin would
be available as prescription drugs and "consumed in a monitored site"
as part of a harm-reduction program.
"I think every doctors' office should be a needle exchange," he
adds.
Bratzer knows his decision to go public with his views might not sit
well with some of his co-workers at the department. As of this week,
he's also got a new boss to consider: Chief Jamie Graham.
"I'm not saying police should stop being police," says Bratzer. "I
have a lot of respect for my fellow police officers, and am not trying
to shove this down their throat.
"But at the end of the day, I didn't want to work as a police officer
for 30 years and end up feeling like this was an issue I should have
spoken up about sooner."
David Bratzer and I share at least one opinion in common: That it
costs us a pointless fortune to maintain the charade of having
effective drug laws in Canada.
It's no big deal that I hold that opinion. Anyone who knows the kind
of things I write about wouldn't be too surprised to discover I'm of
the belief that Canada and the U.S. have made a complete hash of
things by treating a health and social issue like a criminal matter.
But Bratzer holding that opinion, that's a little different. He's a
Victoria police officer -- one of those tasked with enforcing those
laws.
I suspect there are many more who think like Bratzer inside the
department, as you would expect from anyone charged with patrolling
Victoria's ridiculous streets for any length of time. But it's still
not a view that's expressed publicly by police very often.
In fact, Bratzer, a constable, is one of only two active police
officers in Canada who does public speaking on behalf of the
U.S.-based non-profit organization Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
(LEAP). He signed on three months ago after clearing it with his boss,
and now aims to put some of his off hours to use speaking to people
about why drug prohibition doesn't work.
"LEAP's position is that a lot of the problems we're seeing aren't
caused by drugs, but rather the unintended consequences of drug
prohibition," says Bratzer, citing public health problems, violence
and a gang-controlled drug market as examples.
Bratzer came to the same conclusion after three years of policing the
streets of Victoria.
"The effort that we put into chasing drugs -- it's bottomless," he
says. "Canadians have put billions and billions into fighting the war
on drugs, but at the end of the day they're cheaper, more potent and
more available than ever before."
Wanting an end to prohibition has nothing to do with liking drug
abuse, notes Bratzer. But ceding control of an arbitrary assortment of
drugs to gangs and criminals simply isn't working as a strategy. The
LEAP website ( www.leap.cc ) tracks U.S. "drug war" spending by the
minute; at $2,000 every 60 seconds, spending for 2008 is already more
than $46 billion.
Canada doesn't officially have a war on drugs, with federal
authorities preferring to describe our efforts as "demand and
availability reduction." We're not quite so jail-crazy, nor so prone
to lock up people indefinitely at great cost and to little effect.
But we still spend a heck of a lot on drug enforcement in Canada --
more than half a billion dollars a year. And if the goal of all that
spending is to wipe out trafficking and the use of illegal drugs, then
anyone with eyes and 15 minutes to hang out in the downtown can see
that it's not working.
"The LEAP strategy is to build a bureau of speakers modelled on
Vietnam Vets Against the War. That group was effective because they
had the credibility of having been there," says Bratzer. "What LEAP
believes is that once people hear from those in law enforcement about
the multiple harms caused by drug prohibition, they'll change their
minds."
Bratzer is careful to point out that his views are his own, and not
those of the Victoria Police Department. He also stresses that the
solutions lie in slow, measured steps that remove drug laws and
replace them with good public policy.
"I don't support drug abuse, and I don't support breaking the law. I
know it all has to be about baby steps," says Bratzer. "My message to
the marijuana lobby is to aim higher, because if marijuana becomes
legal but all the others remain the way they are, there's still a lot
of harm being done."
Bratzer's view is that "soft" drugs should be taxed and sold, similar
to alcohol and tobacco. Harder drugs such as cocaine and heroin would
be available as prescription drugs and "consumed in a monitored site"
as part of a harm-reduction program.
"I think every doctors' office should be a needle exchange," he
adds.
Bratzer knows his decision to go public with his views might not sit
well with some of his co-workers at the department. As of this week,
he's also got a new boss to consider: Chief Jamie Graham.
"I'm not saying police should stop being police," says Bratzer. "I
have a lot of respect for my fellow police officers, and am not trying
to shove this down their throat.
"But at the end of the day, I didn't want to work as a police officer
for 30 years and end up feeling like this was an issue I should have
spoken up about sooner."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...