News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: The Firestorm Over Giving Diehards A Free Heroin Fix |
Title: | CN BC: The Firestorm Over Giving Diehards A Free Heroin Fix |
Published On: | 2008-11-04 |
Source: | Globe and Mail (Canada) |
Fetched On: | 2008-11-07 00:33:19 |
THE FIRESTORM OVER GIVING DIEHARDS A FREE HEROIN FIX
VANCOUVER -- Long-time addict Robert Vincent says he's living proof
that getting free, daily heroin can improve the quality of a drug
user's life, possibly steering him closer to recovery. "I wasn't
waking up in the middle of the night worrying where I was going to get
the money to get my fix," said Mr. Vincent, who speaks with a slight
lisp, the result of large gaps between his teeth. "I started to eat
better, regain my appetite."
Mr. Vincent, 36, was one of 115 men and women, all diehard heroin
addicts, who were part of a groundbreaking but controversial Canadian
medical trial, called NAOMI - the North American Opiate Medication
Initiative - which doled out free heroin for a year to addicts in
Vancouver and Montreal. Others in the study received methadone or
hydromorphone, a prescription painkiller.
Its preliminary results were released last month, with researchers
concluding that most addicts committed fewer crimes and took better
care of themselves when they didn't have to steal and panhandle to
support their pricey heroin habits. They say they will use the results
to press the government to consider free heroin as a treatment option
for incurable addicts.
Mr. Vincent, they say, is an example of how an addict's life can
improve when freed from the constraints of scrounging for money to
feed a costly, illegal habit. While on the study, Mr. Vincent left the
street, found an apartment, landed a job and gained 30 pounds.
But then the free heroin stopped.
Today, he is back living on the street, delving through back-alley
garbage bins for returnable bottles to earn money to buy drugs. He
said he uses street-purchased morphine and hydromorphone. The day
after an initial interview with The Globe and Mail, Mr. Vincent failed
to show up for a follow-up meeting. He was spotted a few hours later
standing outside Vancouver's supervised injection site, his eyes
fluttering and his chin drooped on his chest. He was clearly high.
According to NAOMI researchers, addicts like Mr. Vincent fare better
when they can obtain drugs for free in a supervised medical setting.
But do they?
Some addiction physicians say it is unethical to provide free heroin
to severely addicted, long-term injection-drug users. They also say
the NAOMI results, which were based on the addicts' answers to
questions, may have been skewed to support a case for free heroin.
"There is a fine line between harm reduction and enabling," said
Stanley deVlaming, who has treated addicts in Vancouver's Downtown
Eastside for years. Dr. deVlaming believes the study, which he says
was based largely on self-reporting, was politicized. Severely
addicted people knew that if they responded positively to the free
heroin, it could bolster the chances of receiving the illegal drug
down the road.
Dr. deVlaming argues that the best way to treat heroin addiction is
with methadone, a synthetic drug that helps prevent withdrawal
sickness but does not induce euphoria.
"For many of these patients, if I hand them their heroin, if I make it
easier for them to stay addicted, am I doing them any favours?" Dr.
deVlaming asked. "When I treat a patient, I often say that I am
treating two sides of that person. There's one side that's trying to
get better and there's that side of them, the addicted side, that
wants to stay addicted. I try to align myself with the side of them
that wants to get better."
Another Vancouver addiction physician, Milan Khara, said doctors who
speak against the effectiveness of the heroin trials have been
harassed, as have those who have criticized another so-called
harm-reduction initiative, Vancouver's supervised injection site.
Dr. Khara criticized the NAOMI results, saying he too thinks the
participants in the heroin study were motivated to report positive
results.
"At the end of the day, these individuals have an addiction," he said.
"If they believe their answers are going to lead to a lifetime of free
heroin, their answers become highly unreliable."
Dr. deVlaming says he has concerns too with any treatment that
involves daily injections, which often cause serious infections in the
heart, spine or bones. "There is nothing safe about repeated daily
injections directly into your veins," he said.
The heroin trials involved 251 people. In addition to the heroin
participants, 111 received methadone orally and 25 were injected with
hydromorphone.
Greg Liang, an addict who was part of the heroin trial, says the
program helped stabilize his life. Mr. Liang felt tremendous relief at
not having to hustle for money to buy drugs. The NAOMI heroin was pure
and uncut, providing a longer high than street heroin. "It was quite
delicious," he said in an interview at a Vancouver coffee shop.
But Mr. Liang, 41, who began using drugs at 18, says the free heroin
made him complacent about his addiction. Other addicts, he says, took
advantage of the free heroin, even competing for how much they could
consume each day. For some, their habits grew worse. "They were heroin
pigs," he said, shaking his head.
After nine months on the heroin trial, Mr. Liang says, he switched to
methadone because he knew it would be hard to stop cold turkey when
the study ended.
Today, Mr. Liang is still using heroin and cocaine. He says he's not
sure if the heroin program helped his addiction. Like Mr. Vincent, his
quality of life improved for a period. He began volunteering for the
city of Vancouver, helping addicts. It eventually became a paid,
part-time position.
But Mr. Liang says his life is still controlled by drugs. A stressful
day can set off a binge. He thinks the only way to quit drugs is to
move far from Vancouver's Downtown Eastside, where there are scores of
services for addicts.
"Everything is provided for you here. There's always a meal, always a
place to sleep, cheap housing," he said.
But researchers on the NAOMI project have said the study bolsters the
argument for legalizing heroin in some controlled settings as a method
of treating hardcore addicts.
The research project, which operated from a clinic in Vancouver's
Downtown Eastside, still treats a handful of patients who stayed on
the methadone plan.
The team appealed to Vancouver's health-funding authority to keep the
clinic open, providing methadone and hydromorphone. But the group
hasn't heard a response.
Martin Schechter, NAOMI's chief investigator, said researchers have no
qualms about giving addicts free heroin and denied the program helped
enable their addictions.
"This is a way of providing a maintenance therapy that allows them to
get out of the street cycle of illicit drugs because these people are
injecting heroin right now," Dr. Schechter said. "It's not like we're
starting them on heroin. They're on it now. So the question is: Who do
you want prescribing it? You have the black market or doctors or nurses."
VANCOUVER -- Long-time addict Robert Vincent says he's living proof
that getting free, daily heroin can improve the quality of a drug
user's life, possibly steering him closer to recovery. "I wasn't
waking up in the middle of the night worrying where I was going to get
the money to get my fix," said Mr. Vincent, who speaks with a slight
lisp, the result of large gaps between his teeth. "I started to eat
better, regain my appetite."
Mr. Vincent, 36, was one of 115 men and women, all diehard heroin
addicts, who were part of a groundbreaking but controversial Canadian
medical trial, called NAOMI - the North American Opiate Medication
Initiative - which doled out free heroin for a year to addicts in
Vancouver and Montreal. Others in the study received methadone or
hydromorphone, a prescription painkiller.
Its preliminary results were released last month, with researchers
concluding that most addicts committed fewer crimes and took better
care of themselves when they didn't have to steal and panhandle to
support their pricey heroin habits. They say they will use the results
to press the government to consider free heroin as a treatment option
for incurable addicts.
Mr. Vincent, they say, is an example of how an addict's life can
improve when freed from the constraints of scrounging for money to
feed a costly, illegal habit. While on the study, Mr. Vincent left the
street, found an apartment, landed a job and gained 30 pounds.
But then the free heroin stopped.
Today, he is back living on the street, delving through back-alley
garbage bins for returnable bottles to earn money to buy drugs. He
said he uses street-purchased morphine and hydromorphone. The day
after an initial interview with The Globe and Mail, Mr. Vincent failed
to show up for a follow-up meeting. He was spotted a few hours later
standing outside Vancouver's supervised injection site, his eyes
fluttering and his chin drooped on his chest. He was clearly high.
According to NAOMI researchers, addicts like Mr. Vincent fare better
when they can obtain drugs for free in a supervised medical setting.
But do they?
Some addiction physicians say it is unethical to provide free heroin
to severely addicted, long-term injection-drug users. They also say
the NAOMI results, which were based on the addicts' answers to
questions, may have been skewed to support a case for free heroin.
"There is a fine line between harm reduction and enabling," said
Stanley deVlaming, who has treated addicts in Vancouver's Downtown
Eastside for years. Dr. deVlaming believes the study, which he says
was based largely on self-reporting, was politicized. Severely
addicted people knew that if they responded positively to the free
heroin, it could bolster the chances of receiving the illegal drug
down the road.
Dr. deVlaming argues that the best way to treat heroin addiction is
with methadone, a synthetic drug that helps prevent withdrawal
sickness but does not induce euphoria.
"For many of these patients, if I hand them their heroin, if I make it
easier for them to stay addicted, am I doing them any favours?" Dr.
deVlaming asked. "When I treat a patient, I often say that I am
treating two sides of that person. There's one side that's trying to
get better and there's that side of them, the addicted side, that
wants to stay addicted. I try to align myself with the side of them
that wants to get better."
Another Vancouver addiction physician, Milan Khara, said doctors who
speak against the effectiveness of the heroin trials have been
harassed, as have those who have criticized another so-called
harm-reduction initiative, Vancouver's supervised injection site.
Dr. Khara criticized the NAOMI results, saying he too thinks the
participants in the heroin study were motivated to report positive
results.
"At the end of the day, these individuals have an addiction," he said.
"If they believe their answers are going to lead to a lifetime of free
heroin, their answers become highly unreliable."
Dr. deVlaming says he has concerns too with any treatment that
involves daily injections, which often cause serious infections in the
heart, spine or bones. "There is nothing safe about repeated daily
injections directly into your veins," he said.
The heroin trials involved 251 people. In addition to the heroin
participants, 111 received methadone orally and 25 were injected with
hydromorphone.
Greg Liang, an addict who was part of the heroin trial, says the
program helped stabilize his life. Mr. Liang felt tremendous relief at
not having to hustle for money to buy drugs. The NAOMI heroin was pure
and uncut, providing a longer high than street heroin. "It was quite
delicious," he said in an interview at a Vancouver coffee shop.
But Mr. Liang, 41, who began using drugs at 18, says the free heroin
made him complacent about his addiction. Other addicts, he says, took
advantage of the free heroin, even competing for how much they could
consume each day. For some, their habits grew worse. "They were heroin
pigs," he said, shaking his head.
After nine months on the heroin trial, Mr. Liang says, he switched to
methadone because he knew it would be hard to stop cold turkey when
the study ended.
Today, Mr. Liang is still using heroin and cocaine. He says he's not
sure if the heroin program helped his addiction. Like Mr. Vincent, his
quality of life improved for a period. He began volunteering for the
city of Vancouver, helping addicts. It eventually became a paid,
part-time position.
But Mr. Liang says his life is still controlled by drugs. A stressful
day can set off a binge. He thinks the only way to quit drugs is to
move far from Vancouver's Downtown Eastside, where there are scores of
services for addicts.
"Everything is provided for you here. There's always a meal, always a
place to sleep, cheap housing," he said.
But researchers on the NAOMI project have said the study bolsters the
argument for legalizing heroin in some controlled settings as a method
of treating hardcore addicts.
The research project, which operated from a clinic in Vancouver's
Downtown Eastside, still treats a handful of patients who stayed on
the methadone plan.
The team appealed to Vancouver's health-funding authority to keep the
clinic open, providing methadone and hydromorphone. But the group
hasn't heard a response.
Martin Schechter, NAOMI's chief investigator, said researchers have no
qualms about giving addicts free heroin and denied the program helped
enable their addictions.
"This is a way of providing a maintenance therapy that allows them to
get out of the street cycle of illicit drugs because these people are
injecting heroin right now," Dr. Schechter said. "It's not like we're
starting them on heroin. They're on it now. So the question is: Who do
you want prescribing it? You have the black market or doctors or nurses."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...