News (Media Awareness Project) - US MA: Question 2 Decriminalization Of Marijuana |
Title: | US MA: Question 2 Decriminalization Of Marijuana |
Published On: | 2008-11-02 |
Source: | Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-11-04 18:48:35 |
QUESTION 2 DECRIMINALIZATION OF MARIJUANA
Question 2 seeks to replace criminal penalties for possession of one
ounce or less of marijuana with a new system of civil penalties, to
be enforced by issuing citations. The new system would exclude
information regarding this civil offense from the state's criminal
record information system (CORI). Offenders age 18 or older would be
subject to forfeiture of the marijuana plus a civil penalty of $100.
Offenders under the age of 18 would be subject to the same forfeiture
and, if they complete a drug awareness program within one year of the
offense, the same $100 penalty.
Proponents of Question 2 say changing the penalties for possessing
small amounts of marijuana would free police up to focus on serious
crimes, rather than arresting 7,500 people annually for marijuana
possession. Taxpayers would save $30 million a year in arrest costs.
"Question 2 would not increase marijuana use," said Whitney A.
Taylor, campaign manager for the Committee for Sensible Marijuana
Policy. "Eleven other states have similar laws and have shown no
increase in marijuana use."
Opponents include most law enforcement agencies.
"Marijuana decriminalization is an endorsement of substance abuse and
dangerous criminal activity, and sends the wrong message to young
people," said Michael O'Keefe, district attorney for the Cape and
Islands, and president of the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association.
Question 2 seeks to replace criminal penalties for possession of one
ounce or less of marijuana with a new system of civil penalties, to
be enforced by issuing citations. The new system would exclude
information regarding this civil offense from the state's criminal
record information system (CORI). Offenders age 18 or older would be
subject to forfeiture of the marijuana plus a civil penalty of $100.
Offenders under the age of 18 would be subject to the same forfeiture
and, if they complete a drug awareness program within one year of the
offense, the same $100 penalty.
Proponents of Question 2 say changing the penalties for possessing
small amounts of marijuana would free police up to focus on serious
crimes, rather than arresting 7,500 people annually for marijuana
possession. Taxpayers would save $30 million a year in arrest costs.
"Question 2 would not increase marijuana use," said Whitney A.
Taylor, campaign manager for the Committee for Sensible Marijuana
Policy. "Eleven other states have similar laws and have shown no
increase in marijuana use."
Opponents include most law enforcement agencies.
"Marijuana decriminalization is an endorsement of substance abuse and
dangerous criminal activity, and sends the wrong message to young
people," said Michael O'Keefe, district attorney for the Cape and
Islands, and president of the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...