WAR ON DRUGS IS KILLING OUR SOLDIERS

Afghanistan is going badly. "We're not going to win this war," said a
top British general this month.

Well, pass the smelling salts.

The War on Drugs created Afghanistan's massive illicit drug trade.
This trade funds the insurgency, corrupts the government and
destabilizes society. But neither the United States nor the United
Nations will acknowledge that the War on Drugs is anything less than a
roaring success and so they refuse to discuss alternatives to the
policy that fuels the whole bloody mess.

And victory eludes us? Well.

The debate about Afghanistan has always bordered on farce. Every
serious observer -- including the country's president -- has said that
Afghanistan's illicit drug trade, not the Taliban, is the greatest
threat the country faces. And yet the drug trade has always been
treated as a peripheral issue.

Discussion has been scant. It has also been ignorant and vapid. Even
the Manley report said nothing intelligent about it. "Coherent
counter-narcotic strategies need to be adopted by all relevant
authorities," the report sagely recommended, leaving the identity of
these marvellous strategies to the reader's imagination.

This failure has many causes, but a key one is the simple fact that
the primary source of information about the drug trade is the UN
Office on Drugs and Crime. For the UNODC, the criminal prohibition of
drugs is not merely a tool of public policy. It is a cause, a crusade,
a faith. One does not question a faith. One promotes it.

And that's what the UNODC does every year when it releases its World
Drug Report.

For journalists and politicians the world over, the WDR is the
definitive source of information about drugs and drug policy. Any time
you read a news story or political statement about drugs, there's a
good chance the WDR was used as a source.

To an extent, that's fine. The report has lots of solid
data.

But it is primarily an instrument of propaganda. Its purpose is to
praise the status quo, bury evidence of failure and frame the
discussion so serious scrutiny of the War on Drugs never happens.

In the latest edition of the WDR, Antonio Maria Costa, UNOCDC
director, boasts Southeast Asia "is now almost opium free." This is a
model for Afghanistan, he writes.

What Costa doesn't mention is that the large declines in opium poppy
production in Southeast Asia occurred at the same time as even bigger
increases were observed in Afghanistan. This was not a
coincidence.

Squeeze a balloon in one place and it bulges elsewhere. When cocaine
production was driven down in Bolivia and Peru, it soared in Colombia.
When methamphetamine production was suppressed in the U.S., it shot up
in Mexico. It's predictable.

Opium has grown in Afghanistan since time immemorial, but it was never
a major source of black market drugs. That started to change in the
1970s, when the balloon was squeezed in Turkey. In the 1980s and
1990s, the squeeze shifted to Southeast Asia and Pakistan.

And today, Afghanistan supplies 93 per cent of the world's illicit
opium. For that, we can thank the very actions which the UNODC says
are a model for Afghanistan.

Thanks to criminal prohibition, the report argues, "the drug problem
was dramatically reduced over the past century." Proof lies in the
fact that world production of opium fell from 41.4 tonnes to 12.6
tonnes between 1906 -- when the drug was legal almost everywhere --
and 2007.

There are several problems here. First, the figure for 1906 is almost
certainly inflated, as many observers said at the time. Second, it
ignores the fact that opium's role in medicine, which was huge at the
beginning of the 20th century, steadily diminished.

In 1998, the WDR notes, a UN special assembly "urged countries to do
more to control drugs." And they did. As a result, Costa writes, "the
world drug situation has stabilized and been brought under control."

It's quite a story. Unfortunately, it's not even close to true. In
1998, the UN special assembly set a goal of "eliminating or
significantly reducing the illicit cultivation of the coca bush, the
cannabis plant and the opium poppy by the year 2008."

Over the following 10 years, cocaine output grew 20 per cent and opium
production doubled, according to the UNODC's own figures.

Don't be fooled by the UN imprimatur. The World Drug Report is crude
propaganda.

Journalists and politicians who take it at face value contribute to
the manipulation of public opinion and the stifling of meaningful
debate. And that is unacceptable at a time when Canadian soldiers are
fighting and dying in the War on Drugs.