News (Media Awareness Project) - US: OPED: Say 'No' To Legalization Of Marijuana |
Title: | US: OPED: Say 'No' To Legalization Of Marijuana |
Published On: | 1995-08-18 |
Source: | Wall Street Journal (US) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-09 02:17:06 |
SAY 'NO' TO LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA
Earlier this summer the Department of Health and Human Services held the
first-ever national research conference on marijuana, at which scientists
presented groundbreaking information about the danger of marijuana use.
What was said has implications for every business, every citizen, and every
parent, particularly as new calls are being heard to legalize marijuana.
Peter Fried, who is associated with Carleton University in Ottawa,
discussed his preliminary findings that marijuana use during pregnancy has
harmful effects on children's intellectual abilities a decade or more after
they are born. Through the use of an animal model of addiction, Billy
Martin of Virginia Commonwealth University showed that compulsive marijuana
use may lead to an addiction similar to those produced by other illicit drugs.
These findings are particularly troubling because we have witnessed a
three-year increase in marijuana use among American teenagers, at a time
when more potent forms of marijuana are readily available: Thirteen percent
of eighth graders reported having tried marijuana at least once in 1994-up
from 9.2% in 1993, 7.2% in 1992, and 6.2% in 1991. Still, as we commit
ourselves to countering this increase, we need to remember that there is
also some important continuing good news. Adolescent marijuana use remains
well below the levels of the late 1970's and early 1980's. This means that
most young people do not use marijuana, and we need to remind them again
and again of this crucial fact.
A Huge Mistake
Given the facts, it is surprising that some people in Washington and
elsewhere continue to bring up the issue of legalizing marijuana and other
illicit drugs. That would be a huge mistake.
First, marijuana is a problem in our country not because it is harmful-not
because it is illicit. Research continues to show that it damages
short-term memory, distorts perception, impairs judgment and complex motor
skills, alters the heart rate, can lead to severe anxiety, and can cause
paranoia and lethargy. Its use by young people is clearly associated with
increased truancy, poor school performance and crime. And new research by
Roger Roffman and Robert Stephens at the University of Washington shows
that marijuana can put a serious chokehold on long-term users who try to quit.
Second, marijuana use has great costs and consequences to all of us in
society-not just to users. Young marijuana users are more likely than
nonusers to use other illicit drugs, to have automobile crashes, and to be
arrested. They are less likely to achieve their academic potential, which
detracts from national productivity in the long run. They are at greater
risk of needing expensive emergency room treatment, which costs us money in
the short run. Indeed, in 1993, twice as many teenagers ended up in
emergency rooms for marijuana use as for heroin and cocaine combined.
And, more broadly, drug use, including marijuana use, causes considerable
damage in our workplaces. Few Americans realize that three-fourths of
regular drug users are employed. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
employed drug users are 33% less effective than their nonabusing
colleagues. They are likely to incur 300% higher medical costs and benefits.
Third, legalization of marijuana almost certainly would cause more young
people to use-and become addicted to-marijuana, as well as other drugs.
In part, that's because legalizing drugs takes away a significant deterrent
against drug use. Moreover, for as long as we have monitored drug use, we
have seen that whenever there is a decrease in the percentage of young
people who perceive marijuana use as harmful, the percentage of users
increases. Inevitably, legalization would suggest to young people that
marijuana is not harmful thereby knocking down a powerful barrier to use.
And even worse, because laws are rightly perceived by citizens in our
democracy as the expression of national values, legalization would imply
that marijuana use is an accepted-and acceptable-social practice. For many
teenagers, that would intensify the already severe peer pressure they face
to use drugs. Our daughters and sons would no longer have on their side the
moral authority of our laws to bolster their antidrug attitudes and desire
not to use drugs.
Indeed, reversing directions and legalizing marijuana could cause young
people to dismiss warnings they have heard from government and the larger
society about other illicit drugs like crack, cocaine and heroin-an erosion
of trust that must never be allowed to happen.
What's behind the call for legalization of marijuana? Sometimes, it's a
myth-like the false notion that marijuana is a "soft" drug. Sometimes it's
the erroneous conclusion that legalization is the way to make drugs less
prevalent in our country.
I believe there is a way to achieve a drug-free society-but there is no
single, simple solution. The Clinton administration has embarked on a
comprehensive drug strategy-a massive effort to reduce both the supply and
the demand. In this effort, the role of the Department of Health and Human
Services is critical: we are working with many partners to prevent drug
use, provide effective treatment, conduct research of drug issues, and
disseminate information to experts and the general public.
Specifically in relation to marijuana, we have taken a number of strong,
targeted steps. We continue to fund major research on the effects of
marijuana use on behavior. For example, within the next year, we expect
publication of the results of a major government-funded study showing the
extent to which acute marijuana smoking and the potency of smoked marijuana
are related to motivation to perform work tasks.
Based on our growing body of knowledge about marijuana, we have developed
an aggressive communications strategy. For example, we know that it is
critical to reach young people early, before they have begun to use drugs,
with clear information about marijuana and with positive alternatives for
their time. Young children typically have very strong antidrug attitudes;
it's essential to reinforce them.
We also know that in order to stop marijuana use we must send young people
clear and consistent messages. As a result, we are working across many
media, with many partners, to tell young people: Don't start using
marijuana, and if you have, stop right away. Marijuana use is illegal,
dangerous, and unhealthy. It is not cool. It is not respectful of one's
body. And it is certainly not rampant among young people. This is a message
we cannot emphasize enough.
Our research tells is something else as well. We know that young people
need to hear antidrug messages where they live, where they study, where
they work, where they play, and where they hang out. In other words, while
the federal government must provide leadership, it cannot solve the drug
problem alone-and it shouldn't try. We're recruiting parents and other
family members to set drug-free examples for young people and talk with
them about drugs. We're helping schools, community groups, religious
organizations, the private sector, and state and local governments to join
forces to give young people something to say "yes" to. We're meeting with
the media and entertainment industries to promote programming that
deglamorizes drug use and other risky behaviors. And we're challenging
young people to work with us, knowing that teenagers have a unique gift for
getting into each other's heads and influencing behavior.
A National Challenge
Make no mistake. We face a national challenge, and our young people are
watching closely to see how we respond. We must not blink. It is
unfortunate, however, that the Republican majority in Congress is
attempting to cut back dramatically our commitment to stopping drug use. On
Aug. 4, the House slashed $401 million in substance abuse and mental health
prevention and treatment grants at HHS. It also cut $300 million from the
Safe and Drug Free Schools program, depriving more than 23 million students
of services in 1996 alone. A Senate Appropriations subcommittee proposed to
eliminate the Office of the White House Drug Policy Coordinator.
This turnabout is remarkably shortsighted. At a time when marijuana use has
climbed, the foundation of success is education, prevention, treatment,
research, law enforcement, interdiction, and massive community
involvement-not legalization or gutting our national commitment against
drug use.
As we tighten our federal belts and rethink the scope and rule of the
federal government, we must never forget that the drug issue is about our
national future. It is about real human beings, young people who have
within them both a galaxy of gifts and a fragility that leaves them
vulnerable to foolish choices and risky behavior We must be there for them.
We must do what is right for them and the nation.
Earlier this summer the Department of Health and Human Services held the
first-ever national research conference on marijuana, at which scientists
presented groundbreaking information about the danger of marijuana use.
What was said has implications for every business, every citizen, and every
parent, particularly as new calls are being heard to legalize marijuana.
Peter Fried, who is associated with Carleton University in Ottawa,
discussed his preliminary findings that marijuana use during pregnancy has
harmful effects on children's intellectual abilities a decade or more after
they are born. Through the use of an animal model of addiction, Billy
Martin of Virginia Commonwealth University showed that compulsive marijuana
use may lead to an addiction similar to those produced by other illicit drugs.
These findings are particularly troubling because we have witnessed a
three-year increase in marijuana use among American teenagers, at a time
when more potent forms of marijuana are readily available: Thirteen percent
of eighth graders reported having tried marijuana at least once in 1994-up
from 9.2% in 1993, 7.2% in 1992, and 6.2% in 1991. Still, as we commit
ourselves to countering this increase, we need to remember that there is
also some important continuing good news. Adolescent marijuana use remains
well below the levels of the late 1970's and early 1980's. This means that
most young people do not use marijuana, and we need to remind them again
and again of this crucial fact.
A Huge Mistake
Given the facts, it is surprising that some people in Washington and
elsewhere continue to bring up the issue of legalizing marijuana and other
illicit drugs. That would be a huge mistake.
First, marijuana is a problem in our country not because it is harmful-not
because it is illicit. Research continues to show that it damages
short-term memory, distorts perception, impairs judgment and complex motor
skills, alters the heart rate, can lead to severe anxiety, and can cause
paranoia and lethargy. Its use by young people is clearly associated with
increased truancy, poor school performance and crime. And new research by
Roger Roffman and Robert Stephens at the University of Washington shows
that marijuana can put a serious chokehold on long-term users who try to quit.
Second, marijuana use has great costs and consequences to all of us in
society-not just to users. Young marijuana users are more likely than
nonusers to use other illicit drugs, to have automobile crashes, and to be
arrested. They are less likely to achieve their academic potential, which
detracts from national productivity in the long run. They are at greater
risk of needing expensive emergency room treatment, which costs us money in
the short run. Indeed, in 1993, twice as many teenagers ended up in
emergency rooms for marijuana use as for heroin and cocaine combined.
And, more broadly, drug use, including marijuana use, causes considerable
damage in our workplaces. Few Americans realize that three-fourths of
regular drug users are employed. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
employed drug users are 33% less effective than their nonabusing
colleagues. They are likely to incur 300% higher medical costs and benefits.
Third, legalization of marijuana almost certainly would cause more young
people to use-and become addicted to-marijuana, as well as other drugs.
In part, that's because legalizing drugs takes away a significant deterrent
against drug use. Moreover, for as long as we have monitored drug use, we
have seen that whenever there is a decrease in the percentage of young
people who perceive marijuana use as harmful, the percentage of users
increases. Inevitably, legalization would suggest to young people that
marijuana is not harmful thereby knocking down a powerful barrier to use.
And even worse, because laws are rightly perceived by citizens in our
democracy as the expression of national values, legalization would imply
that marijuana use is an accepted-and acceptable-social practice. For many
teenagers, that would intensify the already severe peer pressure they face
to use drugs. Our daughters and sons would no longer have on their side the
moral authority of our laws to bolster their antidrug attitudes and desire
not to use drugs.
Indeed, reversing directions and legalizing marijuana could cause young
people to dismiss warnings they have heard from government and the larger
society about other illicit drugs like crack, cocaine and heroin-an erosion
of trust that must never be allowed to happen.
What's behind the call for legalization of marijuana? Sometimes, it's a
myth-like the false notion that marijuana is a "soft" drug. Sometimes it's
the erroneous conclusion that legalization is the way to make drugs less
prevalent in our country.
I believe there is a way to achieve a drug-free society-but there is no
single, simple solution. The Clinton administration has embarked on a
comprehensive drug strategy-a massive effort to reduce both the supply and
the demand. In this effort, the role of the Department of Health and Human
Services is critical: we are working with many partners to prevent drug
use, provide effective treatment, conduct research of drug issues, and
disseminate information to experts and the general public.
Specifically in relation to marijuana, we have taken a number of strong,
targeted steps. We continue to fund major research on the effects of
marijuana use on behavior. For example, within the next year, we expect
publication of the results of a major government-funded study showing the
extent to which acute marijuana smoking and the potency of smoked marijuana
are related to motivation to perform work tasks.
Based on our growing body of knowledge about marijuana, we have developed
an aggressive communications strategy. For example, we know that it is
critical to reach young people early, before they have begun to use drugs,
with clear information about marijuana and with positive alternatives for
their time. Young children typically have very strong antidrug attitudes;
it's essential to reinforce them.
We also know that in order to stop marijuana use we must send young people
clear and consistent messages. As a result, we are working across many
media, with many partners, to tell young people: Don't start using
marijuana, and if you have, stop right away. Marijuana use is illegal,
dangerous, and unhealthy. It is not cool. It is not respectful of one's
body. And it is certainly not rampant among young people. This is a message
we cannot emphasize enough.
Our research tells is something else as well. We know that young people
need to hear antidrug messages where they live, where they study, where
they work, where they play, and where they hang out. In other words, while
the federal government must provide leadership, it cannot solve the drug
problem alone-and it shouldn't try. We're recruiting parents and other
family members to set drug-free examples for young people and talk with
them about drugs. We're helping schools, community groups, religious
organizations, the private sector, and state and local governments to join
forces to give young people something to say "yes" to. We're meeting with
the media and entertainment industries to promote programming that
deglamorizes drug use and other risky behaviors. And we're challenging
young people to work with us, knowing that teenagers have a unique gift for
getting into each other's heads and influencing behavior.
A National Challenge
Make no mistake. We face a national challenge, and our young people are
watching closely to see how we respond. We must not blink. It is
unfortunate, however, that the Republican majority in Congress is
attempting to cut back dramatically our commitment to stopping drug use. On
Aug. 4, the House slashed $401 million in substance abuse and mental health
prevention and treatment grants at HHS. It also cut $300 million from the
Safe and Drug Free Schools program, depriving more than 23 million students
of services in 1996 alone. A Senate Appropriations subcommittee proposed to
eliminate the Office of the White House Drug Policy Coordinator.
This turnabout is remarkably shortsighted. At a time when marijuana use has
climbed, the foundation of success is education, prevention, treatment,
research, law enforcement, interdiction, and massive community
involvement-not legalization or gutting our national commitment against
drug use.
As we tighten our federal belts and rethink the scope and rule of the
federal government, we must never forget that the drug issue is about our
national future. It is about real human beings, young people who have
within them both a galaxy of gifts and a fragility that leaves them
vulnerable to foolish choices and risky behavior We must be there for them.
We must do what is right for them and the nation.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...