News (Media Awareness Project) - Critics: New wine labels would encourage drinking |
Title: | Critics: New wine labels would encourage drinking |
Published On: | 1997-07-23 |
Source: | San Jose Mercury |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-08 14:09:10 |
Posted at 8:08 p.m. PDT Monday, July 21, 1997
Critics: New wine labels would encourage drinking
WASHINGTON (AP) The wine industry wants it known that a glass now
and then can be good for the heart, but federal health officials are worried that
proposed new wording on bottle labels might encourage excessive drinking.
Despite the criticisms, officials at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
have signaled they are likely to endorse the labels, which would be included
on both domestic and imported wines sold in this country.
The Health and Human Services Department has been urging ATF to delay
approval of the labels, which refer to the ``health effects'' of ``moderate'' wine
drinking.
``The proposal under consideration is a thinly disguised attempt to make an
affirmative health claim,'' said Dr. John M. Eisenberg, acting assistant secretary
for health.
``I am deeply concerned that your approval of the label statements in their
current form would be construed by the public as encouraging the
consumption of alcoholic beverages,'' Eisenberg said in a letter to ATF Director
John Magaw.
Wine labels already contain warnings that women should not drink during
pregnancy and that alcoholic beverages can impair driving and cause health
problems. But they say nothing about numerous health studies indicating that
moderate alcohol intake can reduce risk of heart disease in some people.
To the current warning, a label proposed by the San Franciscobased Wine
Institute would add: ``To learn the health effects of moderate wine
consumption, send for the federal government's Dietary Guidelines for
Americans.'' It gives a mailing address and an Internet web site.
A second proposal would say: ``The proud people who make this wine
encourage you to consult your family doctor about the health effects of wine
enjoyment.''
Wine Institute President John DeLuca said the government guidelines discuss
both the risks and benefits of drinking alcohol and he says the proposed
wording makes no claims that wine is good for you.
``We're not saying health benefits, we're saying health effects,'' he said.
``We're not for a blanket endorsement. We think there is a scientific balance
struck in the guidelines, and we should be allowed to disseminate them.''
DeLuca acknowledged there would be ``some marketing benefits'' to the labels.
But he said the vintners' true purpose is providing people with a way to
obtain governmentendorsed information that wine is not all bad.
Any ads by wine makers would not be permitted to go beyond the careful
wording on the labels and could make no direct health claims.
``The antialcohol movement has tried to depict us as no different than
cigarettes or heroin,'' he said. ``We want to improve our image.''
So far, ATF's Magaw has rejected the argument that the labels make any
improper claims about health and drinking. In a recent letter to HHS, he
indicated that his agency was nearing a decision and would likely approve the
change.
``They merely direct the consumer to a qualified source of information
regarding the health effects of alcohol consumption,'' Magaw wrote. ``Both
statements are neutral. Neither statement characterizes health benefits or
risks.''
ATF's apparent willingness to endorse the labels has outraged some
antialcohol and health groups, who want studies done to determine how
consumers might perceive the new wording.
The labels might recall to a consumer's mind positive publicity about the link
between alcohol consumption and reduced heart disease, but not about
alcohol's negative links to cancer, cirrhosis of the liver, car crashes and
violence, said Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in
the Public Interest.
``Nobody's going to send away for the dietary guidelines or talk to their doctor
that's irrational,'' Jacobson said. ``The labels will help create a climate that
alcoholic beverages are not a problem.''
DeLuca maintained, however, that what vintners really want is a ``cultural
development'' that would make attitudes toward wine in the United States
more like those in much of Europe, where wine is regularly consumed with
meals, even by young children.
``This is only an educational tool,'' he said.
Critics: New wine labels would encourage drinking
WASHINGTON (AP) The wine industry wants it known that a glass now
and then can be good for the heart, but federal health officials are worried that
proposed new wording on bottle labels might encourage excessive drinking.
Despite the criticisms, officials at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
have signaled they are likely to endorse the labels, which would be included
on both domestic and imported wines sold in this country.
The Health and Human Services Department has been urging ATF to delay
approval of the labels, which refer to the ``health effects'' of ``moderate'' wine
drinking.
``The proposal under consideration is a thinly disguised attempt to make an
affirmative health claim,'' said Dr. John M. Eisenberg, acting assistant secretary
for health.
``I am deeply concerned that your approval of the label statements in their
current form would be construed by the public as encouraging the
consumption of alcoholic beverages,'' Eisenberg said in a letter to ATF Director
John Magaw.
Wine labels already contain warnings that women should not drink during
pregnancy and that alcoholic beverages can impair driving and cause health
problems. But they say nothing about numerous health studies indicating that
moderate alcohol intake can reduce risk of heart disease in some people.
To the current warning, a label proposed by the San Franciscobased Wine
Institute would add: ``To learn the health effects of moderate wine
consumption, send for the federal government's Dietary Guidelines for
Americans.'' It gives a mailing address and an Internet web site.
A second proposal would say: ``The proud people who make this wine
encourage you to consult your family doctor about the health effects of wine
enjoyment.''
Wine Institute President John DeLuca said the government guidelines discuss
both the risks and benefits of drinking alcohol and he says the proposed
wording makes no claims that wine is good for you.
``We're not saying health benefits, we're saying health effects,'' he said.
``We're not for a blanket endorsement. We think there is a scientific balance
struck in the guidelines, and we should be allowed to disseminate them.''
DeLuca acknowledged there would be ``some marketing benefits'' to the labels.
But he said the vintners' true purpose is providing people with a way to
obtain governmentendorsed information that wine is not all bad.
Any ads by wine makers would not be permitted to go beyond the careful
wording on the labels and could make no direct health claims.
``The antialcohol movement has tried to depict us as no different than
cigarettes or heroin,'' he said. ``We want to improve our image.''
So far, ATF's Magaw has rejected the argument that the labels make any
improper claims about health and drinking. In a recent letter to HHS, he
indicated that his agency was nearing a decision and would likely approve the
change.
``They merely direct the consumer to a qualified source of information
regarding the health effects of alcohol consumption,'' Magaw wrote. ``Both
statements are neutral. Neither statement characterizes health benefits or
risks.''
ATF's apparent willingness to endorse the labels has outraged some
antialcohol and health groups, who want studies done to determine how
consumers might perceive the new wording.
The labels might recall to a consumer's mind positive publicity about the link
between alcohol consumption and reduced heart disease, but not about
alcohol's negative links to cancer, cirrhosis of the liver, car crashes and
violence, said Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in
the Public Interest.
``Nobody's going to send away for the dietary guidelines or talk to their doctor
that's irrational,'' Jacobson said. ``The labels will help create a climate that
alcoholic beverages are not a problem.''
DeLuca maintained, however, that what vintners really want is a ``cultural
development'' that would make attitudes toward wine in the United States
more like those in much of Europe, where wine is regularly consumed with
meals, even by young children.
``This is only an educational tool,'' he said.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...