News (Media Awareness Project) - OPED: A profile in politics |
Title: | OPED: A profile in politics |
Published On: | 1997-09-01 |
Source: | The Des Moines Register, page 8A |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-07 22:20:31 |
THE REGISTER'S EDITORIALS
A profile in politics
Score another victory for partisan politics, the ultimate power in the game
of government. Republican William Weld has given up the battle to be the
U.S. ambassador to Mexico, after resigning the governorship of
Massachusetts earlier this summer to fight for the job.
His withdrawal resulted from the implacable animosity of Senator Jesse
Helms, Republican of North Carolina. But it was an animosity that needn't
have been allowed to carry the day. Helms, possibly the greatest
embarrassment the U.S. Senate has known since the days of Mississippi's
Theodore Bilbo, has been around so long that he rose to the important
chairmanship of the Committee on Foreign Relations. He opposes Weld, he
says, because Weld favors medicinal use of marijuana and needle exchanges
to reduce transmittal of bloodborne diseases. Both are sensible positions,
but to Helms they mean Weld is "soft on drugs." Hence Helms refused to
allow confirmation hearings before his committee. As presidential spokesman
Mike McCurry said in July, "The Constitution does not grant to one
individual senator the right to stand in the way of the prerogative of a
president to name foreign emissaries...." Right, but the excercise of a
constitutional right can sometimes demand fortitude. The Foreign Relations
Committee could have voted on the Weld nomination without Helms' sanction.
But the committee wasn't about to risk offending its powerful chairman.
And, while the committee has a 108 Republican majority, to a number of GOP
members, Weld isn't "their kind" of Republican; he tends to moderation.
Why, then, didn't the full Senate take the nomination out of the hands of
the committee? Same political makeup; same answer.
A profile in politics
Score another victory for partisan politics, the ultimate power in the game
of government. Republican William Weld has given up the battle to be the
U.S. ambassador to Mexico, after resigning the governorship of
Massachusetts earlier this summer to fight for the job.
His withdrawal resulted from the implacable animosity of Senator Jesse
Helms, Republican of North Carolina. But it was an animosity that needn't
have been allowed to carry the day. Helms, possibly the greatest
embarrassment the U.S. Senate has known since the days of Mississippi's
Theodore Bilbo, has been around so long that he rose to the important
chairmanship of the Committee on Foreign Relations. He opposes Weld, he
says, because Weld favors medicinal use of marijuana and needle exchanges
to reduce transmittal of bloodborne diseases. Both are sensible positions,
but to Helms they mean Weld is "soft on drugs." Hence Helms refused to
allow confirmation hearings before his committee. As presidential spokesman
Mike McCurry said in July, "The Constitution does not grant to one
individual senator the right to stand in the way of the prerogative of a
president to name foreign emissaries...." Right, but the excercise of a
constitutional right can sometimes demand fortitude. The Foreign Relations
Committee could have voted on the Weld nomination without Helms' sanction.
But the committee wasn't about to risk offending its powerful chairman.
And, while the committee has a 108 Republican majority, to a number of GOP
members, Weld isn't "their kind" of Republican; he tends to moderation.
Why, then, didn't the full Senate take the nomination out of the hands of
the committee? Same political makeup; same answer.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...