Straw orders review of cannabis law enforcement

Do you have any memories of a Cabinet member using cannabis? If so, phone
01712932490 or fax 01712932043.

JACK STRAW, the Home Secretary, is reviewing the way the police deal with
those caught in possession of cannabis.

The move is the first tacit acceptance by the Government that the
application of the cannabis law in Britain needs examining and comes at the
end of the third week of the Independent on Sunday's campaign for the
decriminalisation of cannabis for medicinal and personal use.

Last week, the IoS asked each member of the Cabinet if they had ever
personally used cannabis. Of the 22strong Cabinet, 17 refused to reply and
four Tony Blair, John Prescott, Ron Davies and Lord Richard sent under
separate cover the same answer: "We do not take part in surveys. Jack Straw
has made the Government's position perfectly clear. We shall not
decriminalise, legalise or legitimise the use of drugs." Harriet Harman's
office said: "The minister does not wish to reply."

Rosie Boycott, IoS editor, said she was disappointed with the response
because ministers had failed completely to answer the simple question. "It
was not a survey but a question for each Cabinet member," she said.

However, for the first time a senior Labour figure has broken ranks to
support the campaign. Ken Livingstone, the leftwing MP who hopes to become
the first Mayor of London, has put his name to the list of supporters for
decriminalisation. His signature brings the number of aspiring mayors in
favour of decriminalisation to three: Richard Branson and Simon Jenkins are
also on the list.

Also throwing their weight behind the campaign today are John le Carre,
Janet Suzman, Peter Gabriel, Dave Stewart and Michael Frayn.

In a phonein poll conducted early last week, readers of the IoS voted
overwhelmingly in favour of relaxing the law. Of the 5,830 callers, 5,408,
or 93 per cent, voted "yes" and 428, or seven per cent, said "no".

Mr Straw is concerned that the 43 police forces in England and Wales have
too much discretion over the way in which they deal with cannabis
possession cases, resulting in an inconsistent response. For an identical
offence, it is up to the police in each area whether they prosecute, issue
a caution or take no action at all.

One Whitehall source said that Mr Straw, "has the view that there has to be
a more coordinated approach but that possession isn't treated as a
throwaway crime". A likely outcome is a set of recommendations for chief
police officers to bring them into line.

One other possibility, the introduction of a series of a scale of fixed
penalties for soft drugs cases similar to motoring offences was
discounted by government sources last week on the grounds that it would
require a change in the law. Fixed penalties would not result in a criminal
record and would effectively be a major step in the decriminalisation of
cannabis.

A similar scheme was proposed for Scotland in 1994 by the then Scottish
Secretary, Michael Forsyth, but was blocked by the then Home Secretary,
Michael Howard. He instead amended the Criminal Justice Bill to increase
the maximum fine for possession of marijuana from £500 to £2,500.

A review of the way the drugs laws are enforced is likely to be welcomed by
many police officers. At the Labour Party conference this month, Fred
Broughton, chairman of the Police Federation, said: "In our view, it is
crucial that when it comes to drugs, chief officers should be singing from
the same hymn sheet."