News (Media Awareness Project) - US UT: OPED: MotherstoBe Need Help, Not Fear, Critics Say |
Title: | US UT: OPED: MotherstoBe Need Help, Not Fear, Critics Say |
Published On: | 1997-12-01 |
Source: | Salt Lake Tribune (Utah) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-07 19:06:13 |
MOTHERSTOBE NEED HELP, NOT FEAR, CRITICS SAY
Everybody agrees pregnant women should not abuse drugs or alcohol
because it puts their fetuses at risk for a lifetime of physical and
mental problems.
But in the wake of a felony child abuse case filed against a Tooele
mother, it is clear that opinions differ on how society should deal with
this public health scourge.
Julie Garner, 26, was charged last month after she gave birth to a
sickly child following a pregnancy allegedly filled with alcohol abuse.
Last Monday, 3rd District Judge L.A. Dever freed Garner, who had
been in jail for six days on $10,000 bail, and set a preliminary hearing
for Jan. 14. Garner, the second Utahn charged for socalled ``fetal
abuse,'' could face up to 5 years in prison if convicted of the
thirddegree felony.
Deputy Tooele County Attorney John Bybee says the case could deter
other expectant mothers from substance abuse because they could be held
criminally accountable.
``Mr. Bybee doesn't understand alcoholism,'' responds Garner's
mother, Valerie Stechschulte. ``There's a huge difference between a
criminal and a person who is ill. Alcoholism is a disease. Fear is not
going to help these people. Alcoholics don't drink to harm their
children.''
Critics like Stechschulte contend the threat of prosecution more
likely would deter addicted mothers from seeking treatment out of fear
of going to jail or losing custody of their child.
``What will protect them from being turned in when they show up for
prenatal care?'' says Louise Melling, an attorney with the American
Civil Liberties Union's Reproductive Freedom Project. Civil libertarians
also fear that ``fetal abuse'' cases are backdoor attempts to extend
the legal status of fetuses at the expense of mothers' rights.
Many observers say that if Utah leaders are truly concerned, they
should support programs to prevent prenatal substance abuse, an effort
that requires outreach and education.
``If Utahns put their money where their priorities are, we would
have had a good chance to give this woman [Garner] the support she
needed to understand what she was doing,'' says Roz McGee, executive
director of Utah Children. ``It's investing [in prevention], not just
lip service.''
Several states began prosecuting prenatal drug use during the height
of the crack epidemic in the late 1980s, when drugexposed babies
created a highly visible publichealth crisis. Prosecutors used
traditional child abuse and drug trafficking statutes to win a handful
of convictions, most of which were thrown out on appeal because these
laws were not intended to protect fetuses.
But Utah did not join this criminal justice experiment until last
year when Salt Lake County prosecutors charged a drug dealer with child
abuse after her baby girl was born with controlled substances in her
system.
The subsequent conviction of Kim Hoskins of West Valley City is one
of the few fetal abuse convictions on the books, but the Hoskins case
sets no legal precedents because she declined to appeal. She is serving
up to 15 years in prison on her drug convictions and a concurrent 5year
term for child abuse.
Unlike Hoskins, who used cocaine and methamphetamine while pregnant,
Garner's underlying vice is legal. Third District Court records contain
no criminal background except for traffic offenses, including a drunken
driving conviction.
``She has a sweet and loving nature,'' her mother says.
Garner's father abandoned the family when she was 9 years old, and
Stechschulte says she had little time for her children while she
returned to school and worked to support them. Garner took up drinking
when she was 15 and by the time Stechschulte found out, her daughter had
a problem.
The unmarried Garner has an 8yearold son, who lives with his
father. She became pregnant early this year, but Stechschulte does not
know who the father is.
Prosecutors say Garner's baby girl was born full term at a tiny 2
pounds. The child spent nearly a month in intensive care before the
state Division of Child and Family Services placed her in a foster home.
Stechschulte, who is fighting to gain custody of her granddaughter,
contends the baby weighed in at 2 pounds, 9 ounces and was born a week
shy of full term.
Prenatal exposure to illegal drugs has been linked to low birth
weight and respiratory and neurological problems in children, but the
connection remains tenuous.
Alcohol, however, has been so exhaustively implicated in birth
defects that a disease is named after it: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. This
malady afflicts about 10 percent of children born to chronic drinkers,
while another 40 percent may suffer adverse effects of alcohol exposure,
says developmental psychologist Barbara Morse, who heads the Fetal
Alcohol Education Program.
Binge drinking, particularly late in the pregnancy, is more likely
to cause FAS than regular, but more moderate imbibing, Morse says. The
disorder leaves children developmentally disabled.
``The greatest risk is in the third trimester, when the brain is
developing,'' she says. ``That's why treatment can be effective.''
Diagnosing FAS is difficult during the first year of a child's life,
although newborns sometimes exhibit signs and facial characteristics
consistent with the syndrome, according to Morse. Extremely low birth
weight, as was the case with the Garner child, is not necessarily an
indicator.
``You have to ask yourself what other reasons there are why a baby
would be that small,'' Morse says.
Morse and others point out that other lawful activities have been
shown to be harmful to the unborn. If authorities criminalize prenatal
drinking, why not target expectant mothers who smoke tobacco, diabetics
who fail to take insulin or parents who have children despite a known
genetic predisposition for birth defects, asks Lynn Martinez, a Utah
public health official who specializes in highrisk pregnancy.
Prenatal care is a better use of resources than punitive actions if
the goal is to help the expectant mother avoid risky behavior, Martinez
says. In Salt Lake County, the House of Hope program provides substance
abuse treatment for women, including pregnant women and mothers with
children. Some of its clients are ordered into the program by state
childprotection officials.
``It's a more viable option than incarceration,'' said the program's
executive director. ``They receive parenting skills, vocational
preparedness, relapse prevention.''
The Utah Alcoholism Foundation operates the program on a county
grant.
Everybody agrees pregnant women should not abuse drugs or alcohol
because it puts their fetuses at risk for a lifetime of physical and
mental problems.
But in the wake of a felony child abuse case filed against a Tooele
mother, it is clear that opinions differ on how society should deal with
this public health scourge.
Julie Garner, 26, was charged last month after she gave birth to a
sickly child following a pregnancy allegedly filled with alcohol abuse.
Last Monday, 3rd District Judge L.A. Dever freed Garner, who had
been in jail for six days on $10,000 bail, and set a preliminary hearing
for Jan. 14. Garner, the second Utahn charged for socalled ``fetal
abuse,'' could face up to 5 years in prison if convicted of the
thirddegree felony.
Deputy Tooele County Attorney John Bybee says the case could deter
other expectant mothers from substance abuse because they could be held
criminally accountable.
``Mr. Bybee doesn't understand alcoholism,'' responds Garner's
mother, Valerie Stechschulte. ``There's a huge difference between a
criminal and a person who is ill. Alcoholism is a disease. Fear is not
going to help these people. Alcoholics don't drink to harm their
children.''
Critics like Stechschulte contend the threat of prosecution more
likely would deter addicted mothers from seeking treatment out of fear
of going to jail or losing custody of their child.
``What will protect them from being turned in when they show up for
prenatal care?'' says Louise Melling, an attorney with the American
Civil Liberties Union's Reproductive Freedom Project. Civil libertarians
also fear that ``fetal abuse'' cases are backdoor attempts to extend
the legal status of fetuses at the expense of mothers' rights.
Many observers say that if Utah leaders are truly concerned, they
should support programs to prevent prenatal substance abuse, an effort
that requires outreach and education.
``If Utahns put their money where their priorities are, we would
have had a good chance to give this woman [Garner] the support she
needed to understand what she was doing,'' says Roz McGee, executive
director of Utah Children. ``It's investing [in prevention], not just
lip service.''
Several states began prosecuting prenatal drug use during the height
of the crack epidemic in the late 1980s, when drugexposed babies
created a highly visible publichealth crisis. Prosecutors used
traditional child abuse and drug trafficking statutes to win a handful
of convictions, most of which were thrown out on appeal because these
laws were not intended to protect fetuses.
But Utah did not join this criminal justice experiment until last
year when Salt Lake County prosecutors charged a drug dealer with child
abuse after her baby girl was born with controlled substances in her
system.
The subsequent conviction of Kim Hoskins of West Valley City is one
of the few fetal abuse convictions on the books, but the Hoskins case
sets no legal precedents because she declined to appeal. She is serving
up to 15 years in prison on her drug convictions and a concurrent 5year
term for child abuse.
Unlike Hoskins, who used cocaine and methamphetamine while pregnant,
Garner's underlying vice is legal. Third District Court records contain
no criminal background except for traffic offenses, including a drunken
driving conviction.
``She has a sweet and loving nature,'' her mother says.
Garner's father abandoned the family when she was 9 years old, and
Stechschulte says she had little time for her children while she
returned to school and worked to support them. Garner took up drinking
when she was 15 and by the time Stechschulte found out, her daughter had
a problem.
The unmarried Garner has an 8yearold son, who lives with his
father. She became pregnant early this year, but Stechschulte does not
know who the father is.
Prosecutors say Garner's baby girl was born full term at a tiny 2
pounds. The child spent nearly a month in intensive care before the
state Division of Child and Family Services placed her in a foster home.
Stechschulte, who is fighting to gain custody of her granddaughter,
contends the baby weighed in at 2 pounds, 9 ounces and was born a week
shy of full term.
Prenatal exposure to illegal drugs has been linked to low birth
weight and respiratory and neurological problems in children, but the
connection remains tenuous.
Alcohol, however, has been so exhaustively implicated in birth
defects that a disease is named after it: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. This
malady afflicts about 10 percent of children born to chronic drinkers,
while another 40 percent may suffer adverse effects of alcohol exposure,
says developmental psychologist Barbara Morse, who heads the Fetal
Alcohol Education Program.
Binge drinking, particularly late in the pregnancy, is more likely
to cause FAS than regular, but more moderate imbibing, Morse says. The
disorder leaves children developmentally disabled.
``The greatest risk is in the third trimester, when the brain is
developing,'' she says. ``That's why treatment can be effective.''
Diagnosing FAS is difficult during the first year of a child's life,
although newborns sometimes exhibit signs and facial characteristics
consistent with the syndrome, according to Morse. Extremely low birth
weight, as was the case with the Garner child, is not necessarily an
indicator.
``You have to ask yourself what other reasons there are why a baby
would be that small,'' Morse says.
Morse and others point out that other lawful activities have been
shown to be harmful to the unborn. If authorities criminalize prenatal
drinking, why not target expectant mothers who smoke tobacco, diabetics
who fail to take insulin or parents who have children despite a known
genetic predisposition for birth defects, asks Lynn Martinez, a Utah
public health official who specializes in highrisk pregnancy.
Prenatal care is a better use of resources than punitive actions if
the goal is to help the expectant mother avoid risky behavior, Martinez
says. In Salt Lake County, the House of Hope program provides substance
abuse treatment for women, including pregnant women and mothers with
children. Some of its clients are ordered into the program by state
childprotection officials.
``It's a more viable option than incarceration,'' said the program's
executive director. ``They receive parenting skills, vocational
preparedness, relapse prevention.''
The Utah Alcoholism Foundation operates the program on a county
grant.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...