Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Pot Clubs Cannot Sell, Court Rules
Title:US CA: Pot Clubs Cannot Sell, Court Rules
Published On:1997-12-13
Source:San Jose Mercury News
Fetched On:2008-09-07 18:36:19
POT CLUBS CANNOT SELL, COURT RULES

Panel Says That's Not Intent Of Prop. 215

SAN FRANCISCO Marijuana clubs cannot sell the drug legally to patients
despite California's medical marijuana initiative, a state appeals court
ruled Friday.

The 1st District Court of Appeal ordered the reinstatement of an injunction
that shut down the Cannabis Buyers' Club in San Francisco after a raid by
Attorney General Dan Lungren's agents in August 1996.

The club had been allowed to operate by San Francisco authorities. But
Lungren's agents said marijuana was being sold to people without doctors'
prescriptions and was resold on the street. They also said children were on
the premises.

The club's founder, Dennis Peron, who was also the author of Proposition
215, called the ruling ``a slap in the face of the voters'' and said he
would appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Peron and five others face charges of sale and transportation of marijuana
seized in the raid.

Judge Reopened Club

Proposition 215, approved in November 1996, allows possession and
cultivation of marijuana upon a doctor's recommendation to ease the pain
and nausea of AIDS, cancer, glaucoma and other conditions.

After the measure passed, Superior Court Judge David Garcia allowed
reopening of the club, ruling that Proposition 215 allowed a nonprofit
organization to sell marijuana to patients who had designated the club as
their ``primary caregiver.''

The appeals court disagreed. Its ruling, the first by a California
appellate court on the issue, takes effect in 30 days unless it is stayed
on appeal.

State law still prohibits anyone, including a nonprofit organization, from
selling marijuana or possessing it for sale, said the opinion by Presiding
Justice J. Clinton Peterson.

``The intent of the initiative was to allow persons to cultivate and
possess a sufficient amount of marijuana for their own approved medical
purposes, and to allow `primary caregivers' the same authority to act on
behalf of those patients too ill or bedridden to do so,'' he said.

The only way a patient can obtain marijuana legally is to grow it or obtain
it from a primary caregiver who has grown it, Peterson said.

``If the drafters of the initiative wanted to legalize the sale of small
amounts of marijuana for approved medical purposes, they could have easily
done so.''

Business Not Individual

Peterson also said a ``primary caregiver,'' defined by Proposition 215 as
an individual, designated by the patient, ``who has consistently assumed
responsibility for the housing, health, or safety of that person,'' cannot
be a commercial enterprise like the Cannabis Buyers' Club.

The club is simply a business, ``open to the public, and one source of
supply for any patient who chooses in the patient's sole discretion to shop
there,'' Peterson said.

The fact that thousands of patients designated the club or Peron as their
primary caregiver made no difference, Peterson said; otherwise, ``any
marijuana dealer in California (could) obtain a primary caregiver
designation from a patient before selling marijuana, and . . . thereby
evade prosecution.''

Peron said the court misinterpreted the measure he drafted.

Proposition 215 ``never said you couldn't assign an entity as your
caregiver,'' like a nurses' organization that furnished nursing care, he
said. ``We envisioned cooperatives that would supply marijuana to people
until the government started centers.''

``Now . . . they have to go back on the street, buy (their) marijuana on
the street, and the people's vote means nothing.''

Justice Zerne Haning joined Peterson's opinion. Justice J. Anthony Kline,
in a separate opinion, said there was no need to rule whether the sale of
marijuana remained absolutely banned, because the injunction could be
reinstated on the grounds that the club was not a primary caregiver.

``The right to obtain marijuana is . . . meaningless if it cannot legally
be satisfied,'' Kline said. He said the majority ruling would make
marijuana unavailable for many seriously ill Californians whose caregivers
were unable to grow the plant or await harvest.

``A person cannot even cultivate marijuana without obtaining seeds, and the
majority does not suggest how this may legally be accomplished,'' Kline
said.
Member Comments
No member comments available...