News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Smoke Measure Draws Fire |
Title: | US CA: Smoke Measure Draws Fire |
Published On: | 1998-02-11 |
Source: | San Jose Mercury News |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-07 15:42:49 |
SMOKE MEASURE DRAWS FIRE
Health groups decry bill OK'd by Assembly
SACRAMENTO -- The state's health lobby, caught off guard by the Assembly's
vote to suspend California's ban on smoking in bars, came back fighting
Tuesday, announcing a full-scale effort to defeat the bill in the Senate.
``We are appalled that the Assembly has kowtowed to the wishes and
manipulation of the tobacco industry,'' said Alan Henderson, president of
the state division of the American Cancer Society. ``We demand that the
Senate kill AB 297. It is a bogus bill, and it will harm California
workers.''
Henderson was joined by representatives of the American Heart Association,
the American Lung Association, the California Medical Association, the
California Nurses Association and the state Labor Federation.
All said they would rally members to lobby their senators against the bill.
AB 297, passed by the Assembly two weeks ago, would suspend the state's
6-week-old ban on smoking in bars and gambling establishments.
The suspension would last for two years or until state occupational health
experts develop standards for ventilation systems that would protect
workers from secondhand smoke.
The vote was hailed by tobacco-industry-sponsored smokers' rights groups as
a legislative response to a chorus of complaints about the new law.
But the health groups assert that criticism of -- and resistance to -- the
new law has been orchestrated by the tobacco industry and overblown in the
media.
``People like this law; it's working,'' said Carolyn Martin of the American
Lung Association. She cited formal surveys that show high compliance rates
in San Diego and San Mateo counties and an informal canvass she made of
Sacramento sports bars over the weekend.
``They tell me that business isn't down and patrons are happy to have clean
air,'' she said.
News reports from around the state, however, paint a slightly different
picture. Enforcement in a number of counties has clearly been spotty, and
there have been isolated cases of bar owners openly defying the law.
In addition, there have been widespread complaints from operators of
charitable bingo games that the smoking ban has driven away patrons.
Martin acknowledged the law might be having an adverse effect on some
stand-alone bars but said such mom-and-pop taverns are only a small part of
the overall picture.
Of the 36,000 licensed bars in California, 89 percent are bar-restaurant
combinations.
``Some stand-alone bars may be hurting,'' Martin said. ``But that's not
what we're talking about. They are a tiny minority.''
The group said it is too soon to determine the economic consequences of the
law on liquor sales at bars.
Health groups decry bill OK'd by Assembly
SACRAMENTO -- The state's health lobby, caught off guard by the Assembly's
vote to suspend California's ban on smoking in bars, came back fighting
Tuesday, announcing a full-scale effort to defeat the bill in the Senate.
``We are appalled that the Assembly has kowtowed to the wishes and
manipulation of the tobacco industry,'' said Alan Henderson, president of
the state division of the American Cancer Society. ``We demand that the
Senate kill AB 297. It is a bogus bill, and it will harm California
workers.''
Henderson was joined by representatives of the American Heart Association,
the American Lung Association, the California Medical Association, the
California Nurses Association and the state Labor Federation.
All said they would rally members to lobby their senators against the bill.
AB 297, passed by the Assembly two weeks ago, would suspend the state's
6-week-old ban on smoking in bars and gambling establishments.
The suspension would last for two years or until state occupational health
experts develop standards for ventilation systems that would protect
workers from secondhand smoke.
The vote was hailed by tobacco-industry-sponsored smokers' rights groups as
a legislative response to a chorus of complaints about the new law.
But the health groups assert that criticism of -- and resistance to -- the
new law has been orchestrated by the tobacco industry and overblown in the
media.
``People like this law; it's working,'' said Carolyn Martin of the American
Lung Association. She cited formal surveys that show high compliance rates
in San Diego and San Mateo counties and an informal canvass she made of
Sacramento sports bars over the weekend.
``They tell me that business isn't down and patrons are happy to have clean
air,'' she said.
News reports from around the state, however, paint a slightly different
picture. Enforcement in a number of counties has clearly been spotty, and
there have been isolated cases of bar owners openly defying the law.
In addition, there have been widespread complaints from operators of
charitable bingo games that the smoking ban has driven away patrons.
Martin acknowledged the law might be having an adverse effect on some
stand-alone bars but said such mom-and-pop taverns are only a small part of
the overall picture.
Of the 36,000 licensed bars in California, 89 percent are bar-restaurant
combinations.
``Some stand-alone bars may be hurting,'' Martin said. ``But that's not
what we're talking about. They are a tiny minority.''
The group said it is too soon to determine the economic consequences of the
law on liquor sales at bars.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...