News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Editorial: Smoke Screens for Health |
Title: | US CA: Editorial: Smoke Screens for Health |
Published On: | 1998-03-27 |
Source: | San Francisco Examiner (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-07 13:11:15 |
SMOKE SCREENS FOR HEALTH
PERHAPS opponents of the ban on smoking in bars can't see the path out of
the forest for the haze of second-hand smoke. Instead of trying to overturn
the law, they should work toward a solution that protects the health of bar
employees and patrons while preserving the "rights" of smokers to enjoy
their oral pastime with a beer or cocktail.
Compliance with the ban on smoking in taverns, which went into effect Jan.
1, has been spotty. In some places, the law has been ignored, and a strong
backlash has developed. Legislation rescinding the ban passed the state
Assembly, but its prospects are doubtful in the state Senate.
This newspaper supports the ban because we are convinced that second-hand
smoke is a health danger. But we also recognize that bars are one of the
last refuges of freedom to indulge human vices.
Some bars have hit on creative solutions: A London double-decker bus parked
outside and reserved for smokers, for example. Common sense, and respect
for others' health, dictates further creativity.
Instead of pushing outright repeal, opponents of the ban should seek
exemption based on installation of air filtration systems that suck up and
screen out pollutants. These smoke screens can't be mere cosmetic props,
however. They must work to protect health, and work well. If that can be
proven, then opponents of the smoking ban have a case. Until then, they can
light up on the sidewalk.
)1998 San Francisco Examiner Page A 20
PERHAPS opponents of the ban on smoking in bars can't see the path out of
the forest for the haze of second-hand smoke. Instead of trying to overturn
the law, they should work toward a solution that protects the health of bar
employees and patrons while preserving the "rights" of smokers to enjoy
their oral pastime with a beer or cocktail.
Compliance with the ban on smoking in taverns, which went into effect Jan.
1, has been spotty. In some places, the law has been ignored, and a strong
backlash has developed. Legislation rescinding the ban passed the state
Assembly, but its prospects are doubtful in the state Senate.
This newspaper supports the ban because we are convinced that second-hand
smoke is a health danger. But we also recognize that bars are one of the
last refuges of freedom to indulge human vices.
Some bars have hit on creative solutions: A London double-decker bus parked
outside and reserved for smokers, for example. Common sense, and respect
for others' health, dictates further creativity.
Instead of pushing outright repeal, opponents of the ban should seek
exemption based on installation of air filtration systems that suck up and
screen out pollutants. These smoke screens can't be mere cosmetic props,
however. They must work to protect health, and work well. If that can be
proven, then opponents of the smoking ban have a case. Until then, they can
light up on the sidewalk.
)1998 San Francisco Examiner Page A 20
Member Comments |
No member comments available...