Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Patient May Sue Police For Pot Arrest
Title:US CA: Patient May Sue Police For Pot Arrest
Published On:1998-06-02
Source:Los Angeles Times (CA)
Fetched On:2008-09-07 09:11:47
PATIENT MAY SUE POLICE FOR POT ARREST

Law: Military veteran with doctor's prescription for medical marijuana says
he was within his Prop. 215 rights in growing cannabis plants for own use.

SIMI VALLEY--The latest test of California's medical marijuana law is
shaping up in Simi Valley, where a man arrested last month for cultivating
more than a dozen pot plants said he will sue police for violating his
rights as a patient.

Dean Jones, 62, made the announcement Monday at his lawyer's office in
Thousand Oaks, saying he will file suit against the department and one of
the arresting officers for violating the protections of Proposition 215, a
1996 initiative approved by 56% of voters statewide.

"I'm just a patient trying to get medication," Jones said. "I believe that I
did everything right according to the law."

Police, however, say officers conducted themselves properly and are
confident that if the case is filed and goes to court, they will be vindicated.

"We don't, by any stretch of the imagination, believe that we violated Mr.
Jones' rights," said Lt. Neal Rein of the Simi Valley Police Department. "I
think that the fact that he was even arrested says a lot about the case."

Jones, a military veteran who said he incurred leg, back and head injuries
during a training exercise, said he suffers from constant migraine
headaches, diabetes, high blood pressure and periodic foot inflammation.

He has also been diagnosed with skin cancer and, as recently as last week,
underwent surgery to have lesions removed from his face and neck.

In addition to a card identifying him as a patient eligible to receive the
drug, he has a prescription from his longtime doctor for marijuana to aid
his treatment regimen.

Jones, a marijuana user for more than 20 years, said he began growing the
drug about four months ago after the Cannabis Club in Thousand Oaks was
closed by the Ventura County Sheriff's Department.

Worried that people could spot his potted marijuana plants in his backyard
and get the wrong impression, Jones and his 82-year-old wife went to the
police station May 26 and informed officers what he was doing.

"I thought it was the right thing to do, telling them that I was growing
cannabis at my home as medication," he said. "But since I did that, it's all
gone downhill."

The next day, two officers went to his home. After Jones invited them in to
see his plants, the officers arrested Jones and took him to Ventura County
Jail, where he was booked on suspicion of felony marijuana cultivation.

He was released about 12 hours later on his own recognizance and will be
arraigned Wednesday at the Ventura County Courthouse.

Although the practicalities of Proposition 215 are still being interpreted
by the courts, the initiative's wording states that criminal statutes "shall
not apply to a patient, or to patient's primary caregiver, who possesses or
cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon
the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician."

Despite Jones' prescription and official card that identifies him a user of
medicinal marijuana, authorities maintain that in this instance he does not
qualify for the exemption.

"There are a lot of questionable issues involved with this particular case
and one of those deals with quantity," Rein said. "The law allows for
personal use and we understand that, but, again, there are some questions in
that regard."

Jones' attorney, Stanley Arky, also represents Andrea Nagy, who opened the
county's first cannabis buyers' club in Thousand Oaks last year. He accused
police of flouting the law.

"If you can't grow your own and you can't purchase it, how is law
enforcement enforcing Prop. 215?" Arky asked rhetorically.

If the case is brought to court, it may provide another test of a law that
already has proved to be particularly prickly.

Authorities, for instance, are caught between conflicting state and federal
laws regarding possession, use and cultivation of marijuana.

Stating that under carefully prescribed circumstances marijuana is legal,
Proposition 215 contrasts sharply with federal laws that classify the drug
as dangerous and prescribe stiff penalties for possession, use and cultivation.

"Some laws are pretty cut and dried, but this one is open for interpretation
and that has led to some of the confusion and cloudiness," said Rein, of the
Simi Valley police. "All of these cases now fall into that gray area, so we
have to take them one at a time."

Most recently, the issue of medicinal use of marijuana has focused on
buyers' clubs like the ones in San Francisco and the one that operated in
Thousand Oaks until authorities closed it in February.

The issues in those cases revolved around the legality of selling a
controlled substance to qualified patients publicly out of storefronts.

Unlike these disputes, the Jones case goes to the very heart of Proposition
215: What protections do qualified patients have to grow their own marijuana?

For Arky, the answer is clear.

"What we have here is a patient who was arrested after he went to the police
to inform them in an effort to comply with the law. . . . What we need to
keep in perspective is that he is a patient who has been denied treatment."

Checked-by: Melodi Cornett
Member Comments
No member comments available...