News (Media Awareness Project) - US: OPED: Crime Rates Fall While Prison Population Rises |
Title: | US: OPED: Crime Rates Fall While Prison Population Rises |
Published On: | 1998-08-09 |
Source: | Oakland Tribune (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-07 03:58:06 |
CRIME RATES FALL WHILE PRISON POPULATION RISES
If I told you that my prescription for making America a bit safer from crime
was to lock up every blessed soul living in Maine and New Hampshire, you'd
think I was nutty.
But official government policy in this country has almost that many people
behind bars this morning, more than 1.7 million. An if you throw in all the
employees who report to prison or jail every day, the guards, cooks, nurses
an administrators, the total of Americans who spend their day inside prison
walls is more than the combined populations of Maine and New Hampshire.
Now for more news: the prison and jail population will probably top 2
million in time for 2000. Sure, crime rates are falling; but prison and jail
populations are rising. How so? Longer sentences. Since Ronald Re-agan's
tough talk on crime proved politically popular In the mid-'80s, your typical
inmate has had five months tacked on to his time in the jug, from an average
of 20 months to 25 months.
Just ask yourself: Have you ever seen a politician brag that he's for
shorter sentences? Easier time? More parole and probation? Have you
forgotten what George Bush's hatchet men did to Michael Dukakis over Willie
Horton in the presidential election 10 years ago? No politician has
forgotten that lesson.
So sentences get longer, rhetoric gets harsher, and candidates outdo
themselves in bragging how tough they'll be on miscreants. Remember Bill
Weld riding Into office promising to introduce his prisoners to "the joy of
breaking rocks?" It's still a trend.
And that average sentence gets longer each month, with longer minimums, the
Three Strikes Law, stricter sentencing rules that prevent judges from
weighing a defendant's youth, IQ, mitigating circumstance or general
stupidity in easing prison stays. We are also cracking down on parole
violators: Nearly one-third of all inmates are back where they are because
they did something really stupid all over again.
You thought our hottest growth industry was something in the computer line?
Try prison construction. All through the '90s, our prison population
expanded by about 64,000 per year. That means every month, we need new cells
for 5,350 men - they are overwhelmingly men. That's a roof, a bed, a barred
door, a toilet, three squares and medical care, plus the custodial charges,
for a net increase of 175 men per day.
You are paying for all this. You are hiring, as tax-payers, on average,
every day of the year, weekends and holidays included, a fresh crew of 175
prisoners, whom you will now have to feed, cloth, medicate, guard and
entertain, plus another crew to watch over them and make sure they don't
leave their new home before their 25-months-and-growing, on average, is up.
Make sense to you? Do you feel safer because going on 2 million of your
fellow Americans are locked up? In many cases, yes, sure, we know there are
dangerous people who deserve to be locked away. The most violent and
felonious, sure, no problem, keep them tucked away. But why do we have so
many more prisoners per capita than any other industrial nation, save
Russia? That is the only country with more inmates per head than we have.
Our rate of incarcerating 645 out of every 100,000 citizens is six to 10
times higher than the rest of the so-called civilized world, save Russia.
Sound bites elect politicians, and "three strikes and you're out" sounds
satisfactory after the local TV station zips up its audience share with live
shots from the latest gruesome crime scene. But 19 out of 20 of those prison
inmates chilling in noisy, crowded, understaffed, over brutalized prisons
come out, typically after 25 months of soul-deadening punishment.
And they come back to live in our midst, and try to pick up where they left
off. Some go straight. Some have the gumption and IQ to get jobs, to
overcome the stigma of a prison record, to renew family life, to get on with
living. A lot don't. They were drunk or high when they did what they did to
get in trouble in the first place, and most prisoners have done a lot more
wrong than what they got sentenced for.
Drinking and drugs gave a lot of them the false courage they needed to try
something really crooked. And if they're a little light in the IQ
department, as many prisoners are, if they had broken families, and lousy
schooling, and a predilection for dope or booze or violent behavior, then
over they go, and in they go. But every other industrial nation, save one,
has devised smoother, calmer, more efficient and less costly ways of dealing
with malefactors.
Shorter, swifter sentences, more counseling and oversight on the street,
intensive job-skill training and maximization of religious and psychological
help. Teaching reading and writing and basic social skills, all these would
help. Prison too often makes hard and brutal men harder and more brutal.
I write a similar column every summer when the numbers come out, usually
picking two states whose population mirrors that in prison. Next year. I'm
afraid, I may have to toss in Rhode Island.
Checked-by: Melodi Cornett
If I told you that my prescription for making America a bit safer from crime
was to lock up every blessed soul living in Maine and New Hampshire, you'd
think I was nutty.
But official government policy in this country has almost that many people
behind bars this morning, more than 1.7 million. An if you throw in all the
employees who report to prison or jail every day, the guards, cooks, nurses
an administrators, the total of Americans who spend their day inside prison
walls is more than the combined populations of Maine and New Hampshire.
Now for more news: the prison and jail population will probably top 2
million in time for 2000. Sure, crime rates are falling; but prison and jail
populations are rising. How so? Longer sentences. Since Ronald Re-agan's
tough talk on crime proved politically popular In the mid-'80s, your typical
inmate has had five months tacked on to his time in the jug, from an average
of 20 months to 25 months.
Just ask yourself: Have you ever seen a politician brag that he's for
shorter sentences? Easier time? More parole and probation? Have you
forgotten what George Bush's hatchet men did to Michael Dukakis over Willie
Horton in the presidential election 10 years ago? No politician has
forgotten that lesson.
So sentences get longer, rhetoric gets harsher, and candidates outdo
themselves in bragging how tough they'll be on miscreants. Remember Bill
Weld riding Into office promising to introduce his prisoners to "the joy of
breaking rocks?" It's still a trend.
And that average sentence gets longer each month, with longer minimums, the
Three Strikes Law, stricter sentencing rules that prevent judges from
weighing a defendant's youth, IQ, mitigating circumstance or general
stupidity in easing prison stays. We are also cracking down on parole
violators: Nearly one-third of all inmates are back where they are because
they did something really stupid all over again.
You thought our hottest growth industry was something in the computer line?
Try prison construction. All through the '90s, our prison population
expanded by about 64,000 per year. That means every month, we need new cells
for 5,350 men - they are overwhelmingly men. That's a roof, a bed, a barred
door, a toilet, three squares and medical care, plus the custodial charges,
for a net increase of 175 men per day.
You are paying for all this. You are hiring, as tax-payers, on average,
every day of the year, weekends and holidays included, a fresh crew of 175
prisoners, whom you will now have to feed, cloth, medicate, guard and
entertain, plus another crew to watch over them and make sure they don't
leave their new home before their 25-months-and-growing, on average, is up.
Make sense to you? Do you feel safer because going on 2 million of your
fellow Americans are locked up? In many cases, yes, sure, we know there are
dangerous people who deserve to be locked away. The most violent and
felonious, sure, no problem, keep them tucked away. But why do we have so
many more prisoners per capita than any other industrial nation, save
Russia? That is the only country with more inmates per head than we have.
Our rate of incarcerating 645 out of every 100,000 citizens is six to 10
times higher than the rest of the so-called civilized world, save Russia.
Sound bites elect politicians, and "three strikes and you're out" sounds
satisfactory after the local TV station zips up its audience share with live
shots from the latest gruesome crime scene. But 19 out of 20 of those prison
inmates chilling in noisy, crowded, understaffed, over brutalized prisons
come out, typically after 25 months of soul-deadening punishment.
And they come back to live in our midst, and try to pick up where they left
off. Some go straight. Some have the gumption and IQ to get jobs, to
overcome the stigma of a prison record, to renew family life, to get on with
living. A lot don't. They were drunk or high when they did what they did to
get in trouble in the first place, and most prisoners have done a lot more
wrong than what they got sentenced for.
Drinking and drugs gave a lot of them the false courage they needed to try
something really crooked. And if they're a little light in the IQ
department, as many prisoners are, if they had broken families, and lousy
schooling, and a predilection for dope or booze or violent behavior, then
over they go, and in they go. But every other industrial nation, save one,
has devised smoother, calmer, more efficient and less costly ways of dealing
with malefactors.
Shorter, swifter sentences, more counseling and oversight on the street,
intensive job-skill training and maximization of religious and psychological
help. Teaching reading and writing and basic social skills, all these would
help. Prison too often makes hard and brutal men harder and more brutal.
I write a similar column every summer when the numbers come out, usually
picking two states whose population mirrors that in prison. Next year. I'm
afraid, I may have to toss in Rhode Island.
Checked-by: Melodi Cornett
Member Comments |
No member comments available...