Chronicle of Higher Education
Research & Publishing
July 24, 1998
Author: Kamilah Duggins

'ACRES OF SKIN'

Temple U. Professor's Book Exposes How Scientists Used Prisoners

Allen Hornblum remembers clearly the hot September day in 1971 when he
arrived at Philadelphia's Holmesburg Prison. He had come to teach literacy
classes. What the 23-year-old found was not just inmates who needed
tutoring, but scores of men whose skin was blotched with bandages and
adhesive tape.

Large white patches on the chests, backs, and arms of the prisoners -- most
of them black -- raised a simple question in Mr. Hornblum's head. What was
wrong with these men?

The answer was not straightforward.

For the previous 20 years, Mr. Hornblum discovered, a University of
Pennsylvania medical professor and dermatologist, fully backed by the
university, had used the prison as his laboratory, and the inmates as his
guinea pigs. The inmates had been used for a wide range of clinical
experiments on consumer products, including deodorant and athlete's-foot
medications, as well as for military experiments on the impact of chemical
weapons.

Mr. Hornblum was told at the time that the prisoners were paid for
participating, and that they could opt out of the experiments at any time.
Still, the scenario seemed inhumane to Mr. Hornblum. In 1993, 20 years
after he first walked into the prison, he came back -- this time as an
adjunct professor of political science at Temple University -- to document
the story of the Holmesburg experiments.

The result is his new book, Acres of Skin: Human Experiments at Holmesburg
Prison, just published by Routledge.

"Holmesburg Prison was one of the largest human research factories in the
U.S. I found that between 1951 and 1974, 79 to 85 per cent of a 1,200-1,400
population of largely black men were tested," he says. "They tested more
people on more protocols than any other place in the U.S."

The experiments were run by Albert Kligman, a Penn professor who was called
by prison officials when inmates suffered an outbreak of athlete's foot in
1951. When he arrived, he saw "acres of skin before him," he told a
reporter in 1966, "like a farmer seeing a fertile field for the first time."

Compared to the 15 cents a day the prisoners earned sewing pants, Dr.
Kligman's pay of as much as $60 per month for the use of a patch of their
skin, was much more lucrative.

"Holmesburg was a county jail, so many of the men saw this as a way to
raise bail money, pay for attorney's fees, provide money for their wives or
girlfriends, or to just buy cigarettes or a piece of cake," Dr. Hornblum says.

People like Withers Ponton, who were subject to the most common patch test,
still complain of scars and bad memories. The test involved creating a
20-block grid on the shoulder or back of an inmate with adhesive tape. In
the squares the test cream or lotion would be applied, and the skin was
then exposed to a sun lamp for up to 30 minutes. That was followed by an
inspection for blistering.

This was repeated every day for 30 days. In an interview, Mr. Ponton, who
is serving a life sentence, told Mr. Hornblum that he went through over 50
tests in 40 months.

As the book recounts, Dr. Kligman, who became famous for his discovery of
the facial cream Retin-A, quickly moved beyond dermatology. Among those who
sponsored his experiments at the prison were the Army, R.J. Reynolds
Tobacco Company, and Johnson & Johnson.

"Kligman was as much an entrepreneur as he was a researcher. He discovered
what I later found out, that Holmesburg was the Macy's and Gimbel's of
human experimentation," Mr. Hornblum says.

Dr. Kligman's operation continued until 1974, when it was shut down
following a series of reports in the local press, which had been sensitized
to the issue by the revelations in 1972 about the infamous Tuskegee
syphilis experiments.

"It was a confluence of many things happening," Mr. Hornblum explains, "The
Tuskegee study was exposed in 1972. There was a rise in inmate lawsuits
against the university and city, and there was a movement in the medical
profession where doctors were speaking up and renouncing the experiments
that were taking place."

Mr. Hornblum says that the heightened public awareness of the experiments
at the prison could lead to a "very explosive" class-action suit against
the prison, the local government, and the University of Pennsylvania. The
American Civil Liberties Union is currently studying whether to revive the
case, even though some inmates brought suits years ago.

Acres of Skin reflects Mr. Hornblum's career in academe and law
enforcement. He has been a professor, first at Drexel University and then
at Temple, since 1982, teaching political science and urban studies. He has
also been chief of staff to the Philadelphia Sheriff's office. That
background was important in his research, he says.

When Mr. Hornblum began to approach them, many of the doctors who had
worked under Dr. Kligman would scream at him for raising the issue, hang up
on him, or speak only with a lawyer present.

The inmates and former inmates wanted to help, but they were knowledgable
only about the surface of the experiments and didn't know the details
beyond what they had been told and personally experienced. In the end, much
of the information came from federal records filed by the groups sponsoring
the experiments.

Dr. Kligman, who is now 82, did speak with him, Mr. Hornblum says,
defending his experiments and saying that the practices were not unusual at
that time.

Penn and Dr. Kligman have jointly defended the projects since the book came
out, but have refused to talk about them in any detail. Richard L. Tennan,
senior vice-dean of the medical school, agrees that the experiments were
inhumane, but notes that standards were different at the time and says that
many discoveries on skin diseases were made as a result of the tests.

Mr. Hornblum has a different view. "It would be nice if the University of
Pennsylvania admitted to this practice that probably violated every code of
ethics medicine has ever seen, especially No. 1 of the Nuremberg Code,
which says that those in a restrained environment should not be tested on
because they are members of a totalitarian environment and cannot exercise
free will."

Copyright (c) 1998 by The Chronicle of Higher Education
http://chronicle.com
Date: 07/24/98
Section: Research & Publishing
Page: A7

Checked-by: Pat Dolan