Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US VT: Supporters, Critics Line Up Over Handling of Pot Case
Title:US VT: Supporters, Critics Line Up Over Handling of Pot Case
Published On:2007-11-15
Source:Burlington Free Press (VT)
Fetched On:2008-01-11 18:42:48
SUPPORTERS, CRITICS LINE UP OVER HANDLING OF POT CASE

WHITE RIVER JUNCTION -- It all started when Martha Davis called
authorities about the dead deer she found on her property.

When a game warden responded and went looking for it, he spotted
marijuana plants in a backyard flower bed, triggering a series of
events that led to the arrest of the lawyer, a prosecutor's decision
to go easy on her and the subsequent intervention of an outraged Gov.
Jim Douglas.

Now, supporters of Windsor County State's Attorney Robert Sand are
speaking out on his behalf in a case that has renewed debate about
Vermont drug policy and ignited concerns about political
interference.

"I don't think it should happen," said Tara Stearns, a 33-year-old
landscaper from Hartland, interviewed Wednesday outside a post office.
"I think the state's attorney should have full rein, his own control.
Let him do his job."

The dustup began Oct. 11, when Davis called authorities to report the
deer on her Windsor property. Game Warden Stephen Majeski smelled and
saw growing marijuana and recently harvested marijuana plants and
obtained a search warrant that resulted in the seizure of 2 1/2 pounds
and 32 plants growing in an indoor growing room.

"That's the last time I call a game warden; that's the last time I try
to do things legally," Davis said when she was being arrested,
according to an affidavit filed in court by Majeski.

Davis, 61, was charged with felony cultivation and possession of
marijuana, but Sand offered her court diversion, a program that allows
juveniles and first-time adult offenders to do community service,
undergo counseling or submit to other activities, with the charges
being dropped upon completion.

Given the felony charge and the amount of marijuana confiscated, it
was an unusual step. According to Valley Court Diversion program
officials, only two suspects in felony marijuana cases were accepted
into court diversion in the last fiscal year, out of about 200 cases.

Douglas responded by ordering state law enforcement agencies handling
"significant" marijuana cases with first-time offenders in Windsor
County to refer them to the state or federal government for
prosecution, bypassing Sand.

He did so because he was concerned about unequal application of the
law in different counties and because of a perception that Davis got
off easy because she was a lawyer and part-time judge.

"The governor believes that the state's attorneys' role is to enforce
the law, not to impose a legal framework based on their ideology that
they wish existed," spokesman Jason Gibbs said.

"Two and a half pounds of marijuana, plus 32 growing plants, that
doesn't readily pass the straight-face test as being for personal
consumption," Attorney General William Sorrell said. "It could keep
the average fraternity happy for a whole school year, with some left
over for summer school."

Some say it was Douglas who overstepped his bounds.

Tuesday, 36 county residents -- including former Lamoille County
prosecutor Scott McGee -- asked Sorrel to disregard Douglas' order.
Meanwhile, 11 state legislators -- all Democrats or Progressives --
have written to the Republican governor to urge him to back off.

"We believe it would be a radical departure from a criminal justice
system that has worked well for two hundred years in this state to
usurp the primary prosecutorial responsibilities of our state's
attorney for crimes committed in our county," said McGee's group, in a
letter released Wednesday.

Last week, the state took Davis off a list of attorneys approved to
sit on Family Court cases. She couldn't be reached for comment
Wednesday. Telephone messages left at her office were not immediately
returned.

Sand, who declined to be interviewed for this article, has said there
was no evidence Davis was selling drugs and that -- because she had a
clean record and wasn't a threat to the public -- she was a good
candidate for diversion.

Sand, 48, who was appointed in 1997 and elected three times since,
running on both Democratic and Republican lines, has been a vocal
advocate of decriminalizing certain drugs, saying they should be
regulated but treated like alcohol and not available to children.

Douglas' move to bypass him is rare, if not unprecedented. Jane
Woodruff, executive director of the state Department of State's
Attorneys and Sheriff's Association, said no governor had done such a
thing in at least 21 years.

But he had the power to.

In his territory, popular sentiment seems to be with Sand, but not
everyone agrees with what he did.

While Douglas' order applied to Vermont State Police, the state
Department of Fish and Wildlife and the state Department of Motor
Vehicles, at least one municipal agency decided it was the right thing
to do.

Springfield Police Chief Douglas Johnston said he decided after
Douglas' order to relay marijuana cases to the state for
prosecution.

"I think he's sending the wrong message out there about drugs," he
said of Sand. "There has to be some consistency across the state and
handling these cases."

The county's police chiefs have asked for a meeting with Sand once he
finishes with a murder trial that starts Nov. 26.

Others take Sand's side.

"He's overreaching the influence of the people who elected (Sand),"
said Andy Kelley, 49, of Hartland, referring to Douglas. "If it was an
ethics thing where the prosecutor acted unethically, then they should
come in and have him removed from duty. That doesn't appear to be the
situation."
Member Comments
No member comments available...