LUNGREN'S OATH
I listen with great interest to Dan Lungren's recent television ads
proclaiming how important character should be in choosing who to vote for.
This is interesting to hear from a man who, as a public servant, decided
that it was his job to subvert the will of the people he was elected to
serve.

The main example of this is Proposition 215. This proposition was passed by
more than 65% of the voters in California. However, when it was then
Lungren's job to implement this new law, his first reaction was to seek ways
around implementing it.

This was a violation of his oath of office and an attack on the rights of
the citizens of California. For this reason I and many others will vote for
Steve Kubby this November. I will also urge those I know to do the same.

If Dan Lungren or Gray Davis truly feels he is the best man for the job then
I challenge them to publicly debate Mr. Kubby. I do not feel that their
subversive policies and actions would stand up for one minute against the
Libertarian platform.

Tommy G. Hawkins Jr. Fresno

Checked-by: Don Beck