News (Media Awareness Project) - US: NYT: PUB LTE: Re: Pedro Oregon |
Title: | US: NYT: PUB LTE: Re: Pedro Oregon |
Published On: | 1998-10-27 |
Source: | The New York Times |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-06 21:40:51 |
(Re "Rights Query on Killing of Immigrant" (news article, Oct. 21):
On an informer's tip that drugs were being sold out of a Mexican
immigrant's Houston apartment, the police forcible entered the home of the
man, Pedro Oregon.
He is now dead, another victim of the war on drugs.
Had Mr. Oregon's killers not been police officers, they would be charged
with murder for breaking into the home of an innocent man and firing 12
shots into him.
Yet there may never be justice in this case, because in our zeal to
eliminate drugs from this country, we have overlooked the effect our battle
is having on innocent people.
Maybe I'm being over-sensitive here, but the replacement of "those we think
we're protecting" with "innocent people" makes it sound like the only
reason I'm upset about Oregon's murder is because he didn't actually have
drugs in his house. The truth is, I could care less if he did, because
"protecting" him from drug use by killing him (or throwing him in jail for
20 years-to life) is a uniquely totalitarian form of protection.
Matthew Stoll
Checked-by: Richard Lake
On an informer's tip that drugs were being sold out of a Mexican
immigrant's Houston apartment, the police forcible entered the home of the
man, Pedro Oregon.
He is now dead, another victim of the war on drugs.
Had Mr. Oregon's killers not been police officers, they would be charged
with murder for breaking into the home of an innocent man and firing 12
shots into him.
Yet there may never be justice in this case, because in our zeal to
eliminate drugs from this country, we have overlooked the effect our battle
is having on innocent people.
Maybe I'm being over-sensitive here, but the replacement of "those we think
we're protecting" with "innocent people" makes it sound like the only
reason I'm upset about Oregon's murder is because he didn't actually have
drugs in his house. The truth is, I could care less if he did, because
"protecting" him from drug use by killing him (or throwing him in jail for
20 years-to life) is a uniquely totalitarian form of protection.
Matthew Stoll
Checked-by: Richard Lake
Member Comments |
No member comments available...