Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: LAT: Stirling'S Ads Try To Implicate Opponent
Title:US CA: LAT: Stirling'S Ads Try To Implicate Opponent
Published On:1998-10-31
Source:Los Angeles Times (CA)
Fetched On:2008-09-06 21:27:38
STIRLING'S ADS TRY TO IMPLICATE OPPONENT

Republican admits he has no evidence, yet radio spots try to suggest
marijuana use by Lockyer. Democrat calls the attack 'desperate.'

SACRAMENTO--Underdog Republican attorney general candidate Dave Stirling is
spending the final days on the campaign trail trying to implicate his
Democratic opponent in drug use--even as Stirling admits to having no
evidence to support the suggestion.

Stirling's admission, made Wednesday night, came as the state Republican
Party began airing radio ads on Stirling's behalf repeating the suggestion
against Democratic state Sen. Bill Lockyer, who has led in recent polls.

Lockyer's campaign responded Friday with threatening letters to radio
stations demanding that the stations provide Lockyer with air time to
respond.

The California Republican Party ad decries Lockyer's response to a recent
question from a radio talk show caller asking whether he ever used marijuana
while in public office.

Lockyer, 57, who has been an elected official for almost 30 years, called
the question inappropriate. Ever since, Stirling has been attacking Lockyer
over his response. Lockyer shrugs off the tactic as "desperate." "I don't
use drugs," he said. "I don't condone the use of drugs. I will enforce laws
against illegal drugs if I'm elected, and I will advocate for programs to
keep kids off drugs." Lockyer's campaign has focused on his promise to work
for a ban on military-style assault weapons. Stirling opposes gun control.

Stirling, 58, has been chief deputy to outgoing Atty. Gen. Dan Lungren since
1991. In that post, Stirling oversaw the state Department of Justice, which
includes the Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement. Stirling said he never
received evidence that any members of the Legislature were using illegal
drugs.

"I did not have any evidence in the last 7 1/2 years that I've been the
chief deputy that there has been illegal drug use in the Legislature,"
Stirling said. "If there had been an indication that a crime was being
committed, and we had reasonable belief that it was an individual that it
was focused on, we would have investigated." However, Stirling insisted that
"the issue is not the evidence," then repeated his attack on Lockyer for not
directly answering whether he had ever used drugs during his years in public
office.

Stirling said he has never used illegal drugs.

Mike Schroeder, chairman of the California Republican Party, defended the
radio ads, which are due to run statewide today. "The media refused to raise
the issue, so we raised it for them." Richie Ross, Lockyer's campaign
manager, said the ads border on defamation, and could result in a lawsuit
against the state party and radio stations if they refuse to grant Lockyer
equal time.

"Stirling admits there is nothing to any of it," Ross said. "If they heard
rumors, why didn't they do anything about it?" Such late attacks are not
unusual in political campaigns, said Gary Jacobson, professor of political
science at UC San Diego. He likened Stirling's tactic to attacking a
candidate for not answering a when-did-you-stop-beating-your-wife question.

"It makes you look like you haven't got anything more attractive to say
about yourself or your opponent," Jacobson said.

Checked-by: Don Beck
Member Comments
No member comments available...