LORDS SAY, LEGALISE CANNABIS FOR MEDICAL USE

The Government should allow doctors to prescribe cannabis for medical use:
this is the conclusion of a report by the House of Lords Science and
Technology Committee, published today.

Lord Perry of Walton, chairman of the inquiry said: "We have seen enough
evidence to convince us that a doctor might legitimately want to prescribe
cannabis to relieve pain, or the symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS), and
that the criminal law ought not to stand in the way. Far from being a step
towards general legalisation, our recommendation would make the ban on
recreational use easier to enforce. Above all, it would show compassion to
patients who currently risk prosecution to get help."

MEDICAL USE

Cannabis is a "Schedule 1" drug, and cannot be used at all in medicine,
except for research under special Home Office licence. The Lords recommend
that it should be moved to "Schedule 2". This would allow doctors to
prescribe it, subject to certain special regulations, and it would allow
doctors and pharmacists to supply it in accordance with a prescription.

The report sets out evidence that cannabis can be effective in some
patients to relieve the symptoms of MS, and against certain forms of pain.
The Lords say, this evidence is enough to justify a change in the law. They
are less convinced about its effectiveness in other conditions, including
epilepsy, glaucoma and asthma.

The Lords welcome the fact that clinical trials of cannabis are currently
being launched, by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and by Dr Geoffrey Guy
of GW Pharmaceuticals, with a view to the eventual licensing of cannabis as
a medicine. The Lords say, however, that cannabis should be rescheduled
now, rather than waiting several years for the results of these trials.

If cannabis ever becomes a licensed medicine, the Lords do not envisage it
being licensed for smoking; they call for research into alternative
delivery systems.

At present, people who use cannabis for medical reasons risk prosecution;
and juries sometimes refuse to convict such people, which brings the law
into disrepute. If prescription were legalised, then someone using cannabis
for medical reasons who was accused of recreational use could clear himself
at once by producing the prescription. [More]

RECREATIONAL USE

The Lords find enough evidence of toxic effects of cannabis to justify
maintaining the present ban on recreational use. Besides being
intoxicating, they report that:

- - regular heavy use can lead to psychological dependence, and even in some
cases to physical dependence, involving withdrawal symptoms;

- - cannabis can pose a risk to people with a heart condition;

- - cannabis can exacerbate pre-existing mental illness;

- - smoking cannabis is as bad for the lungs as smoking tobacco, and may
cause cancer.

NOTES FOR EDITORS

1. The report follows an inquiry which began in April, and included 12
public hearings. A list of the Lords who took part in the study is attached :

2. The report is published by The Stationery Office: Cannabis, HL Paper
151, ISBN 0 10 4151986, £9.50.

3. The evidence taken by the Committee is published separately as HL Paper
151-I, ISBN 0 10 4792981, £22.60.

4. The full text will be on the Internet on publication, accessible via
the UK Parliament home page at www.parliament.uk

4. The Government are required to respond in writing to the report; and
the report will be debated in the House of Lords.

Further information from Elaine Morgan/Tessa Perfect

House of Lords Committee Office

Phone 0171-219 6075; Fax 0171-219 4931

CHAIRMAN

Lord Perry of Walton FRS (Lib Dem): former Professor of Pharmacology;
founding Vice-Chancellor of the Open University 1969-81.

MEMBERS

Lord Butterfield (Cons): Vice-Chancellor of Nottingham University 1970-75;
Regius Professor of Physic (ie medicine), Cambridge, 1975-87;
Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University 1983-85.

Lord Butterworth (Cons): Vice-Chancellor of the University of Warwick 1963-85.

Lord Carmichael of Kelvingrove (Lab): MP 1962-83; former junior Minister in
various departments.

Lord Dixon-Smith (Cons): former Chairman, Association of County Councils.

Lord Kirkwood (Lib Dem): metallurgist; former lecturer, Sheffield University.

Lord Nathan (cross-bench): solicitor; former member of Royal Commission on
Environmental Pollution.

Lord Porter of Luddenham (cross-bench): Nobel Prize for Chemistry 1967;
President of the Royal Society 1985-90.

Lord Rea (Lab): former GP.

Lord Soulsby of Swaffham Prior (Cons): Emeritus Professor of Animal
Pathology, Cambridge; President of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Lord Walton of Detchant (cross-bench): former professor of Neurology and
Dean of Medicine, Newcastle University; former President of the General
Medical Council, the British Medical Association, and the World Federation
of Neurology.

Lord Winston (Lab): Dean of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Checked-by: Richard Lake