SCHOOL DRUG TESTING JUST DOESN'T WORK

Once again, a school is considering the disgusting and reprehensible
practice of making children pee in a cup while their teacher listens
("Drug testing now policy in district," July 31, page A5).

It's only for those who want to be in music or some other competitive
activity, but that doesn't make it better. It makes it
incomprehensible.

First, drug testing in schools doesn't work.

The largest study ever conducted on the topic -- funded by the
National Institute on Drug Abuse -- found that schools that engage in
drug testing have identical rates of drug use to schools that don't
test their students.

But drug testing is a huge growth industry, and companies are
relentless in trying to make schools feel guilty about not purchasing
their product.

Second, study after study has shown that extra-curricular activities
provide positive experiences that reduce the likelihood of kids using
drugs. By testing only those who try out for these positive
activities, you drive away the at-risk kids who could benefit, leaving
them, where? On the streets?

Logically, it would make much more sense for schools to test only the
kids who are not participating. But that's illegal. So in order to
appear to be doing something useful, schools make the problem worse by
sweeping at-risk kids under the rug.

Is there something good that schools can do? Absolutely. Put that drug
testing money into band uniforms. Add more opportunities and
incentives for kids to participate in activities.

And if parents want their kids tested? Go ahead. What's stopping you?
These tests are easily available online or in local stores. Parents
groups can raise money to subsidize them if they wish.

And if listening to a child urinate is even appropriate, it should be
done by his or her parents. Not government officials or English teachers.

PETE GUITHER

Bloomington