News (Media Awareness Project) - US DC: City Blocks Needle Exchange Effort |
Title: | US DC: City Blocks Needle Exchange Effort |
Published On: | 1998-12-02 |
Source: | Washington Post (DC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-06 19:00:17 |
CITY BLOCKS NEEDLE EXCHANGE EFFORT
AIDS Official Says New Program Needs D.C. Council Approval
When President Clinton signed a federal budget measure Oct. 21 that bars
government funding of needle exchange programs for D.C. drug abusers,
Whitman-Walker Clinic officials were ready with a plan to get around it
with a privately financed program.
But six weeks later, District officials are refusing to allow the new
private group to go into business -- even though they agree that the needle
program would prevent the spread of the AIDS virus and other blood-borne
diseases. A city AIDS administration official said that before anyone hands
out clean needles to drug abusers on the streets of the city, the D.C.
Council must pass a law to authorize the group to proceed.
Whitman-Walker officials say that interpretation is incorrect, and council
staff members haven't determined who's right.
Before the ban took effect, a four-member Whitman-Walker Clinic crew
traveled around the city, distributing 17,000 needles a month at regular
stops under a contract with the D.C. AIDS Administration. That stopped the
day the federal budget was accepted by President Clinton.
Whitman-Walker promptly transferred the unit to a new, unrelated
corporation so the needle exchange program would not endanger millions of
dollars in federal and District funds that go to the clinic, one of the
nation's largest HIV-AIDS service providers.
Since then, the crew, known as Prevention Works Inc., has conducted AIDS
tests, distributed injection supplies and tools and urged drug users not to
share needles.
"I feel stuck in a corner," said Paola Barahona, an AIDS prevention and
education specialist with Prevention Works. "They call here, asking where
we are, saying they need us."
The impact will show up in about a year when HIV infections become evident,
she said.
"It is so sad," said Patricia Hawkins, associate executive director of
Whitman-Walker. "The amount of money it costs the District not to have it
in terms of providing care for the people being infected, much less the
emotional cost of losing people we don't have to lose, is great. This is
one of the silver bullets in the war on HIV."
Hawkins said the city is misreading the congressional intent.
"We certainly thought this would be resolved by now, I must tell you,"
Hawkins said. "We submitted this [to the city] before the budget bill was
passed, and they didn't do it fast enough. My sense would be that they
don't want to do anything that could potentially jeopardize their federal
and District money."
But the congressman who introduced the needle amendment said yesterday that
even though he thinks needle exchange programs do not work, his purpose was
not to outlaw all of them in the city.
"My intention was purely to get taxpayer dollars out of providing needles
to drug addicts," said Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), a conservative member of
the House Appropriations Committee.
"But it's a free country," he said. "We spend money foolishly on other
things, and if a private group wants to get together and fund this exchange
program on their own, this country can afford to spend money on a project
that I don't think works."
Researchers have found in repeated studies that needle exchanges are an
effective way to slow the spread of HIV and other blood-borne illnesses
without increasing drug abuse. But even some officials who acknowledge the
validity of those studies remain uncomfortable with the idea of assisting
drug addicts.
In 1996, the D.C. Council passed a law authorizing the city Health
Department to provide needles, and Whitman-Walker was awarded the contract
to carry the program out. The effort was paid for with $210,000 from the
District and $50,000 from private donors, clinic officials said.
Tiahrt's amendment bars the use of federal and local dollars by the
District government, but now city officials say the problem is that they do
not feel they have the authority to delegate that needle-distribution role
to a third party.
"We are very disturbed, but our hands are completely tied," said Stephen
Miller, deputy administrator for AIDS administration.
A senior D.C. Council staff member said yesterday he knows of no needle
exchange proposals that have been presented for legislative action.
Checked-by: Richard Lake
AIDS Official Says New Program Needs D.C. Council Approval
When President Clinton signed a federal budget measure Oct. 21 that bars
government funding of needle exchange programs for D.C. drug abusers,
Whitman-Walker Clinic officials were ready with a plan to get around it
with a privately financed program.
But six weeks later, District officials are refusing to allow the new
private group to go into business -- even though they agree that the needle
program would prevent the spread of the AIDS virus and other blood-borne
diseases. A city AIDS administration official said that before anyone hands
out clean needles to drug abusers on the streets of the city, the D.C.
Council must pass a law to authorize the group to proceed.
Whitman-Walker officials say that interpretation is incorrect, and council
staff members haven't determined who's right.
Before the ban took effect, a four-member Whitman-Walker Clinic crew
traveled around the city, distributing 17,000 needles a month at regular
stops under a contract with the D.C. AIDS Administration. That stopped the
day the federal budget was accepted by President Clinton.
Whitman-Walker promptly transferred the unit to a new, unrelated
corporation so the needle exchange program would not endanger millions of
dollars in federal and District funds that go to the clinic, one of the
nation's largest HIV-AIDS service providers.
Since then, the crew, known as Prevention Works Inc., has conducted AIDS
tests, distributed injection supplies and tools and urged drug users not to
share needles.
"I feel stuck in a corner," said Paola Barahona, an AIDS prevention and
education specialist with Prevention Works. "They call here, asking where
we are, saying they need us."
The impact will show up in about a year when HIV infections become evident,
she said.
"It is so sad," said Patricia Hawkins, associate executive director of
Whitman-Walker. "The amount of money it costs the District not to have it
in terms of providing care for the people being infected, much less the
emotional cost of losing people we don't have to lose, is great. This is
one of the silver bullets in the war on HIV."
Hawkins said the city is misreading the congressional intent.
"We certainly thought this would be resolved by now, I must tell you,"
Hawkins said. "We submitted this [to the city] before the budget bill was
passed, and they didn't do it fast enough. My sense would be that they
don't want to do anything that could potentially jeopardize their federal
and District money."
But the congressman who introduced the needle amendment said yesterday that
even though he thinks needle exchange programs do not work, his purpose was
not to outlaw all of them in the city.
"My intention was purely to get taxpayer dollars out of providing needles
to drug addicts," said Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), a conservative member of
the House Appropriations Committee.
"But it's a free country," he said. "We spend money foolishly on other
things, and if a private group wants to get together and fund this exchange
program on their own, this country can afford to spend money on a project
that I don't think works."
Researchers have found in repeated studies that needle exchanges are an
effective way to slow the spread of HIV and other blood-borne illnesses
without increasing drug abuse. But even some officials who acknowledge the
validity of those studies remain uncomfortable with the idea of assisting
drug addicts.
In 1996, the D.C. Council passed a law authorizing the city Health
Department to provide needles, and Whitman-Walker was awarded the contract
to carry the program out. The effort was paid for with $210,000 from the
District and $50,000 from private donors, clinic officials said.
Tiahrt's amendment bars the use of federal and local dollars by the
District government, but now city officials say the problem is that they do
not feel they have the authority to delegate that needle-distribution role
to a third party.
"We are very disturbed, but our hands are completely tied," said Stephen
Miller, deputy administrator for AIDS administration.
A senior D.C. Council staff member said yesterday he knows of no needle
exchange proposals that have been presented for legislative action.
Checked-by: Richard Lake
Member Comments |
No member comments available...