VEEVERS IS A THREAT

Re: pot-propagating/pushing professor.

Obviously the judge, in reasoning "Jean Veevers does not pose a threat to
the community' has convinced himself that because she is not likely to
physically attack someone.

I suggest that if we are able to remove all drug pushers, our community
would be less-crime-ridden and a far more pleasant place to live.

Surely history has taught us that most of the significant changes in the
world, for good or evil, have been brought about charismatic orators and
teachers; fewer that one tenth of one per cent of the world population.
Veevers' body may not be a threat to our community, but her drug-related
morality, mentality and position of influence are.

What messages will the sociology professor be sending out to students in
her "full class, with waiting lists," if she is allowed to resume her
teaching?

Jack Clover
Victoria

GET RID OF PROF

Re: Pot-growing professor hopes to teach again.

A year of living at home and a fine of $15,000 spread over three years?
That is only $416 a month.

My question for the court is "Where do we buy the seeds? I'll pay the
$15,000 up front if they will leave me alone for 10 years. I'll even agree
to spend the first year at home.

Mind you, I feel so competent that I do believe the system should allow me
to keep my high-paying job instructing youth, but I will be happy to
maintain that crime does not pay. That way, they will come out of my class
thoroughly deterred from ever wanting to take the unthinkable chance of
getting caught for growing pot.

Is this the kind of person that should be teaching our youth? I say get rid
of her and I really don't care how competent she is or how many medical
professionals it took her to get over the embarrassment.

Geoffrey Bruce
Duncan

Checked-by: Richard Lake