News (Media Awareness Project) - US ID: Update: Column: A Drug Sniffing Society |
Title: | US ID: Update: Column: A Drug Sniffing Society |
Published On: | 1999-01-14 |
Source: | The Boise Weekly (ID) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-06 15:43:13 |
A DRUG SNIFFING SOCIETY
I suspect that some of these cars they are going to pick up on are going
to have merchandise with no receipts. -Sheriff George Nourse, anticipating
an incidental benefit to the use of drug-detecting dogs in Canyon County
parking lots.
Shucks, they might even flush out an ACLU lawyer or two. -Anonymous
drug-detecting-dog enthusiast, anticipating a perfect world.
One of these days, we Americans--Idaho Americans in particular and Canyon
County Americans in particular--are gonna have to sit down and figure out
exactly what and how much were willing to give up to keep waging the war
on illegal drugs.
Dont expect it to happen anytime real soon, though. To conduct a
reasonable community discussion that might result in some reasonable
community solutions, its going to take some reasonable community leaders.
At this point in the endless war, youd have more luck spearing squid out
of Lake Lowell than in finding a local official with the guts to suggest
the drug problem has not been, nor will it be, solved by the us-versus-them
policy thats been flopping about on the deck of Americas ship of state
for three decades now, all the time crushing more and more of what keeps
the boat afloat in the first place.
I bring it up because over the last several weeks people in a position to
have their public fingers in our private pies are encouraging some definite
escalations on the drug battlefield. The mayor of Boise, for instance, has
suggested that every employer in Idaho should require employees to tinkle
in a jam jar now and then and submit the contents for chemical analysis.
Officials at Boise High School are considering a policy that would demand
that students who wish to participate in extra-curricular activities first
pass a drug screen. And most controversial, if not most intrusive, 2-C
Sheriff George Nourse is walking narcotics dogs around Canyon County
parking lots in search of stray methamphetamine spoor.
This war has already cost us a bundle, and Im not talking about mere
money. Sure, the billions the nation has poured down this rabbit hole add
up to some significant bread, but we can always make more money. We can
flush durn near more money than you can imagine into septic systems like
Vietnam, Star Wars, tobacco subsidies, Ken Starr--yet we always bounce
back, dont we? If theres one thing this country does well, its making
more money.
But there are other expenses not so easily bounced back from. Its not so
easy to recoup the hundreds of thousands of wasted lives once theyve
withered away under the poverty of addiction or inside the razor-wire
reservations filling up the desert heart of America. Its not so easy to un
- -corrupt local law-enforcement agencies, federal mega-bureaucracies, and
entire foreign countries once the deluge of both drug and anti-drug monies
have corrupted them. Its not so easy to un-weave a criminal drug empire
once its been woven.
And it wont be so easy to un-erode our civil liberties once theyve been
eroded to promote an impossibly pristine vision. Take my word for it.
Hell, dont take my word for it. Take Thomas Jeffersons word for it. Take
the Weimar Republics word for it. Once those civil liberties are gone,
theyre damn tough to get back.
So how many random pee tests are you willing to endure to ensure a
drug-free workplace? If one a month is such a swell idea, maybe three a day
is better. Maybe you wouldnt mind a permanent catheter running straight
from your bladder to the boss office.
Are you pleased that your kids might have to test negative before they can
join debate club, play football for the home team, tootle flute in the pep
band, or engage in any of those activities that would naturally distract
their attentions away from the drug culture? Maybe youd be even happier if
the brats couldnt attend school at all until they prove theyre clean. No
sense teaching a druggie how to function in life, huh?
I know you personally have nothing to hide from those pooches sniffing at
your mini-van, citizen, so maybe you wouldnt mind if they check out your
home, too. Just to be on the safe side.
These are just a few of the things we need to hash out, fellow Americans.
Just how far do we go? All the way, like with the National Guard on
permanent border patrol, troops on the streets, and mandatory urinalysis at
the polls? Might work, and itll only cost us the democracy.
Or maybe we could discuss decriminalizing the stuff--regulating the trade,
cleansing the poisons from the substance, stripping profits from the
dealers, offering treatment instead of jail time, looking for medical
answers instead of prison space. That, too, might work--if were willing to
accept a certain level of dependency.
Or we could continue along as we are--pouring good billions upon bad,
building a prison nation, enriching the crime cartels, and watching people
die. We already know it doesnt work, but it does keep the dogs busy.
I suspect that some of these cars they are going to pick up on are going
to have merchandise with no receipts. -Sheriff George Nourse, anticipating
an incidental benefit to the use of drug-detecting dogs in Canyon County
parking lots.
Shucks, they might even flush out an ACLU lawyer or two. -Anonymous
drug-detecting-dog enthusiast, anticipating a perfect world.
One of these days, we Americans--Idaho Americans in particular and Canyon
County Americans in particular--are gonna have to sit down and figure out
exactly what and how much were willing to give up to keep waging the war
on illegal drugs.
Dont expect it to happen anytime real soon, though. To conduct a
reasonable community discussion that might result in some reasonable
community solutions, its going to take some reasonable community leaders.
At this point in the endless war, youd have more luck spearing squid out
of Lake Lowell than in finding a local official with the guts to suggest
the drug problem has not been, nor will it be, solved by the us-versus-them
policy thats been flopping about on the deck of Americas ship of state
for three decades now, all the time crushing more and more of what keeps
the boat afloat in the first place.
I bring it up because over the last several weeks people in a position to
have their public fingers in our private pies are encouraging some definite
escalations on the drug battlefield. The mayor of Boise, for instance, has
suggested that every employer in Idaho should require employees to tinkle
in a jam jar now and then and submit the contents for chemical analysis.
Officials at Boise High School are considering a policy that would demand
that students who wish to participate in extra-curricular activities first
pass a drug screen. And most controversial, if not most intrusive, 2-C
Sheriff George Nourse is walking narcotics dogs around Canyon County
parking lots in search of stray methamphetamine spoor.
This war has already cost us a bundle, and Im not talking about mere
money. Sure, the billions the nation has poured down this rabbit hole add
up to some significant bread, but we can always make more money. We can
flush durn near more money than you can imagine into septic systems like
Vietnam, Star Wars, tobacco subsidies, Ken Starr--yet we always bounce
back, dont we? If theres one thing this country does well, its making
more money.
But there are other expenses not so easily bounced back from. Its not so
easy to recoup the hundreds of thousands of wasted lives once theyve
withered away under the poverty of addiction or inside the razor-wire
reservations filling up the desert heart of America. Its not so easy to un
- -corrupt local law-enforcement agencies, federal mega-bureaucracies, and
entire foreign countries once the deluge of both drug and anti-drug monies
have corrupted them. Its not so easy to un-weave a criminal drug empire
once its been woven.
And it wont be so easy to un-erode our civil liberties once theyve been
eroded to promote an impossibly pristine vision. Take my word for it.
Hell, dont take my word for it. Take Thomas Jeffersons word for it. Take
the Weimar Republics word for it. Once those civil liberties are gone,
theyre damn tough to get back.
So how many random pee tests are you willing to endure to ensure a
drug-free workplace? If one a month is such a swell idea, maybe three a day
is better. Maybe you wouldnt mind a permanent catheter running straight
from your bladder to the boss office.
Are you pleased that your kids might have to test negative before they can
join debate club, play football for the home team, tootle flute in the pep
band, or engage in any of those activities that would naturally distract
their attentions away from the drug culture? Maybe youd be even happier if
the brats couldnt attend school at all until they prove theyre clean. No
sense teaching a druggie how to function in life, huh?
I know you personally have nothing to hide from those pooches sniffing at
your mini-van, citizen, so maybe you wouldnt mind if they check out your
home, too. Just to be on the safe side.
These are just a few of the things we need to hash out, fellow Americans.
Just how far do we go? All the way, like with the National Guard on
permanent border patrol, troops on the streets, and mandatory urinalysis at
the polls? Might work, and itll only cost us the democracy.
Or maybe we could discuss decriminalizing the stuff--regulating the trade,
cleansing the poisons from the substance, stripping profits from the
dealers, offering treatment instead of jail time, looking for medical
answers instead of prison space. That, too, might work--if were willing to
accept a certain level of dependency.
Or we could continue along as we are--pouring good billions upon bad,
building a prison nation, enriching the crime cartels, and watching people
die. We already know it doesnt work, but it does keep the dogs busy.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...