News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Experts Blast Cigars As Unregulated Danger |
Title: | US: Experts Blast Cigars As Unregulated Danger |
Published On: | 1999-02-27 |
Source: | San Jose Mercury News (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-06 12:25:27 |
EXPERTS BLAST CIGARS AS UNREGULATED DANGER
Officials push warning labels and education
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Cigars are as deadly as cigarettes, and widely used by
teenagers, yet face virtually no federal regulation, government health
officials said Friday, recommending a mandatory national warning label for
the first time.
Requiring health warnings on cigarettes and smokeless tobacco but not cigars
sends the wrong message, said Surgeon General David Satcher.
``The absence of labels on cigars implies cigars are different and don't
carry the same risk,'' Satcher said.
Top officials at the Health and Human Services Department hope the report by
its inspector general will push another agency, the Federal Trade
Commission, to require such warning labels. The FTC has been considering the
matter since April but has yet to announce a decision.
The FTC has the power to require the labels on its own, although it plans to
report to Congress on the issue this spring. Most boxes already include a
label required under a settlement of a California court case.
``Why do you need another one?'' asked Norman Sharp, president of the Cigar
Association of America.
Critics respond that the California labels are not strong enough or
consistently used.
Satcher has been urging the FTC to require labels for some time. ``It's
frustrating that we have not made more progress on this issue,'' he said.
Many cigar smokers discount the health risks.
``I often think of them as producing less risk in terms of lung cancer than
with cigarettes,'' said Michael Burnstein, 30, of New York, who quit smoking
cigarettes but still enjoys an occasional cigar.
Montgomery Kosma, 31, an attorney from Annandale, Va., also smokes a cigar
every few weeks. He figures he and other smokers can evaluate the risks on
their own.
``Most of the upsurge (in cigar smoking) is people who are fairly
well-educated and don't need a paternalistic human-service agency coming and
telling them what to do and making them feel guilty for what they do,'' he
said. ``It's like a nagging mother who is completely unreasonable.''
The National Cancer Institute last year reported that although cigar smokers
inhale less smoke than cigarette smokers, cigars can be just as toxic
because they contain up to 90 times as much of some carcinogenic compounds
as cigarettes. And with higher quantities of such compounds, cigars can
create even more harmful secondhand smoke.
Regular cigar smokers greatly increase their risk of mouth, throat and lung
cancer, the report found.
Satcher and others say a warning label alone will not do much unless it is
part of a larger effort to shift cultural attitudes. He is now working on a
public-awareness campaign on the dangers.
The inspector general also released a second report based on a series of
focus groups with young people: About one in five of the teenagers in the
groups acknowledged having smoked a cigar in the past month, and half the
smokers said they planned to smoke again.
Officials push warning labels and education
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Cigars are as deadly as cigarettes, and widely used by
teenagers, yet face virtually no federal regulation, government health
officials said Friday, recommending a mandatory national warning label for
the first time.
Requiring health warnings on cigarettes and smokeless tobacco but not cigars
sends the wrong message, said Surgeon General David Satcher.
``The absence of labels on cigars implies cigars are different and don't
carry the same risk,'' Satcher said.
Top officials at the Health and Human Services Department hope the report by
its inspector general will push another agency, the Federal Trade
Commission, to require such warning labels. The FTC has been considering the
matter since April but has yet to announce a decision.
The FTC has the power to require the labels on its own, although it plans to
report to Congress on the issue this spring. Most boxes already include a
label required under a settlement of a California court case.
``Why do you need another one?'' asked Norman Sharp, president of the Cigar
Association of America.
Critics respond that the California labels are not strong enough or
consistently used.
Satcher has been urging the FTC to require labels for some time. ``It's
frustrating that we have not made more progress on this issue,'' he said.
Many cigar smokers discount the health risks.
``I often think of them as producing less risk in terms of lung cancer than
with cigarettes,'' said Michael Burnstein, 30, of New York, who quit smoking
cigarettes but still enjoys an occasional cigar.
Montgomery Kosma, 31, an attorney from Annandale, Va., also smokes a cigar
every few weeks. He figures he and other smokers can evaluate the risks on
their own.
``Most of the upsurge (in cigar smoking) is people who are fairly
well-educated and don't need a paternalistic human-service agency coming and
telling them what to do and making them feel guilty for what they do,'' he
said. ``It's like a nagging mother who is completely unreasonable.''
The National Cancer Institute last year reported that although cigar smokers
inhale less smoke than cigarette smokers, cigars can be just as toxic
because they contain up to 90 times as much of some carcinogenic compounds
as cigarettes. And with higher quantities of such compounds, cigars can
create even more harmful secondhand smoke.
Regular cigar smokers greatly increase their risk of mouth, throat and lung
cancer, the report found.
Satcher and others say a warning label alone will not do much unless it is
part of a larger effort to shift cultural attitudes. He is now working on a
public-awareness campaign on the dangers.
The inspector general also released a second report based on a series of
focus groups with young people: About one in five of the teenagers in the
groups acknowledged having smoked a cigar in the past month, and half the
smokers said they planned to smoke again.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...