News (Media Awareness Project) - US KY: School Board Considers Random Drug Tests |
Title: | US KY: School Board Considers Random Drug Tests |
Published On: | 2006-08-21 |
Source: | Grayson County News-Gazette (KY) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-13 05:16:28 |
SCHOOL BOARD CONSIDERS RANDOM DRUG TESTS
It sounds so good -- a drug-free, alcohol-free school system.
Perhaps drug dealers would be the only ones who would say wait a
minute, and it is doubtful anyone other than their cohorts would agree.
While Grayson County Schools aren't saying wait a minute, they are a
bit concerned about exactly how the drug-free, alcohol-free school will happen.
The school board is expected to discuss this and other policy changes
at its September meeting. The policy administrators are talking about
is random testing of students in extracurricular activities and
students who drive to school. For drivers, it would be the same test
bus drivers take now.
School Superintendent Barry Anderson said the new policy, if approved
by the board, means that any student testing positive for a
controlled substance would be removed from the school activity for
three sessions of the activity.
The student, however, could opt for drug counseling from a
board-approved source and remain on a sports team for the next three
games or not miss three band performances, for example.
"What we still have to work out," Anderson said, "is a plan for
applying the policy in a fair way, a way that will work toward a goal
of a drug-free, alcohol-free school."
That's what everybody wants, he said, "but what about the coach who
may see a player's car at an out-of-town bar? Can he kick that
student off the team right there or does he have to wait for the drug
test on Monday, and what does this do to the coaches' authority if he
must wait for the test and the results?"
"What if the student's just there with his dad and his dad is having
a drink, but the student's just playing pool?" he asked.
We've got to get with principles, coaches, advisors and
administrators and work through some of these questions, set up some
kind of procedures, he said. An on-the-spot reprimand could work
better than down-the-road testing or counseling.
And a coach or advisor may be the student's only contact with an adult male.
There is a random drug-testing policy for school district employees,
but, if the random testing for students is approved, it will be a
first for the Grayson County schools. The test would be an analysis of urine.
"We've got to know how long the various controlled substances stay in
the body," he said. "When do we re-test to make sure the student has
stopped using any of the 11 substances recommended for testing, plus
the cost of each test could run to $50, which is money we need to buy
gas for buses and heat the schools..."
Anderson says he doesn't argue with the goal, "but I want us to come
up with a policy we can carry out with no undue harm to students,
that's fair to them, and one that's going to work better than or
augment what we've got now."
Wellness policy, too
Recommended by the Kentucky School Boards Association is another
possible local policy change -- developing a wellness policy for the
school system.
Anderson, who has worked in elementary schools as both a teacher and
principal, says he has noticed an increase in the number of obese
kids over the last 10 years, and he says a wellness policy is overdue
and coming for the district. Federal law requires it, he said.
"But, again, how far do you go?" he asks. Anderson feels some of the
responsibility must rest with parents in this area.
Both Hardin and Jefferson counties have banned all soft drinks in
schools, even in school lobbies. Coca-Cola can be sold in concession
stands, he said, and we're setting up a district-wide wellness fair
in September to get kids and parents involved in what the wellness
policy turns out to include.
Yet, Anderson remembers 3rd grade classrooms where one student was
having a birthday and the child's mom sent in doughnuts or a cake for
all the kids to share. And concession stands often help finance
extracurricular activities in the school system.
"Do you ban this kind of thing?"
He says he doesn't yet have the answer to that one, "but I think cake
and doughnut moms have to make some of these decisions."
"We've cut back on the amount of sugar we're serving at school
lunchrooms and we're offering a lot more health drinks in schools,
but do we go as far as banning the birthday cakes?"
"We've got to get these kinds of questions ironed out," he said.
Anderson thinks parents have to get with a health program, because
"we can teach children, but we can't raise them."
And counting minutes
This policy change is state law, so it's coming -- a new way to tell
how long a student's absent.
Starting now, a student running late would be counted absent for all
the minutes they are late after 60 minutes.
Under 60 minutes is still just tardy, but all the minutes over 60
count toward an absence. The absent minutes that are counted are
tallied according to the number of minutes in a school day (the time
a student must be at school).
"Each student who's late," Anderson said, "will have missed that
percentage of the day, and it's cumulative."
Anderson said Grayson County schools shoot for 95 percent attendance,
but "the minutes can add up quicker than students think, and pretty
soon, a day's missed."
With about 4,200 students in the system, Anderson thinks the
attendance percentage will drop, but he's not sure yet how much. If
it does drop, it means a cut in state funds to the district.
"On average," he said, "the district gets about $20 per student for
each full day of attendance."
But since minutes count, a trip to Elizabethtown for a dental
appointment would probably mean a partial day absent, "because
driving there, getting the teeth worked on and driving back is going
to take longer than 60 minutes."
In most cases, it would be longer than an hour at a local dentist or
doctor, too.
It sounds so good -- a drug-free, alcohol-free school system.
Perhaps drug dealers would be the only ones who would say wait a
minute, and it is doubtful anyone other than their cohorts would agree.
While Grayson County Schools aren't saying wait a minute, they are a
bit concerned about exactly how the drug-free, alcohol-free school will happen.
The school board is expected to discuss this and other policy changes
at its September meeting. The policy administrators are talking about
is random testing of students in extracurricular activities and
students who drive to school. For drivers, it would be the same test
bus drivers take now.
School Superintendent Barry Anderson said the new policy, if approved
by the board, means that any student testing positive for a
controlled substance would be removed from the school activity for
three sessions of the activity.
The student, however, could opt for drug counseling from a
board-approved source and remain on a sports team for the next three
games or not miss three band performances, for example.
"What we still have to work out," Anderson said, "is a plan for
applying the policy in a fair way, a way that will work toward a goal
of a drug-free, alcohol-free school."
That's what everybody wants, he said, "but what about the coach who
may see a player's car at an out-of-town bar? Can he kick that
student off the team right there or does he have to wait for the drug
test on Monday, and what does this do to the coaches' authority if he
must wait for the test and the results?"
"What if the student's just there with his dad and his dad is having
a drink, but the student's just playing pool?" he asked.
We've got to get with principles, coaches, advisors and
administrators and work through some of these questions, set up some
kind of procedures, he said. An on-the-spot reprimand could work
better than down-the-road testing or counseling.
And a coach or advisor may be the student's only contact with an adult male.
There is a random drug-testing policy for school district employees,
but, if the random testing for students is approved, it will be a
first for the Grayson County schools. The test would be an analysis of urine.
"We've got to know how long the various controlled substances stay in
the body," he said. "When do we re-test to make sure the student has
stopped using any of the 11 substances recommended for testing, plus
the cost of each test could run to $50, which is money we need to buy
gas for buses and heat the schools..."
Anderson says he doesn't argue with the goal, "but I want us to come
up with a policy we can carry out with no undue harm to students,
that's fair to them, and one that's going to work better than or
augment what we've got now."
Wellness policy, too
Recommended by the Kentucky School Boards Association is another
possible local policy change -- developing a wellness policy for the
school system.
Anderson, who has worked in elementary schools as both a teacher and
principal, says he has noticed an increase in the number of obese
kids over the last 10 years, and he says a wellness policy is overdue
and coming for the district. Federal law requires it, he said.
"But, again, how far do you go?" he asks. Anderson feels some of the
responsibility must rest with parents in this area.
Both Hardin and Jefferson counties have banned all soft drinks in
schools, even in school lobbies. Coca-Cola can be sold in concession
stands, he said, and we're setting up a district-wide wellness fair
in September to get kids and parents involved in what the wellness
policy turns out to include.
Yet, Anderson remembers 3rd grade classrooms where one student was
having a birthday and the child's mom sent in doughnuts or a cake for
all the kids to share. And concession stands often help finance
extracurricular activities in the school system.
"Do you ban this kind of thing?"
He says he doesn't yet have the answer to that one, "but I think cake
and doughnut moms have to make some of these decisions."
"We've cut back on the amount of sugar we're serving at school
lunchrooms and we're offering a lot more health drinks in schools,
but do we go as far as banning the birthday cakes?"
"We've got to get these kinds of questions ironed out," he said.
Anderson thinks parents have to get with a health program, because
"we can teach children, but we can't raise them."
And counting minutes
This policy change is state law, so it's coming -- a new way to tell
how long a student's absent.
Starting now, a student running late would be counted absent for all
the minutes they are late after 60 minutes.
Under 60 minutes is still just tardy, but all the minutes over 60
count toward an absence. The absent minutes that are counted are
tallied according to the number of minutes in a school day (the time
a student must be at school).
"Each student who's late," Anderson said, "will have missed that
percentage of the day, and it's cumulative."
Anderson said Grayson County schools shoot for 95 percent attendance,
but "the minutes can add up quicker than students think, and pretty
soon, a day's missed."
With about 4,200 students in the system, Anderson thinks the
attendance percentage will drop, but he's not sure yet how much. If
it does drop, it means a cut in state funds to the district.
"On average," he said, "the district gets about $20 per student for
each full day of attendance."
But since minutes count, a trip to Elizabethtown for a dental
appointment would probably mean a partial day absent, "because
driving there, getting the teeth worked on and driving back is going
to take longer than 60 minutes."
In most cases, it would be longer than an hour at a local dentist or
doctor, too.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...