News (Media Awareness Project) - US WA: Column: King County's Sensible Take on Drugs |
Title: | US WA: Column: King County's Sensible Take on Drugs |
Published On: | 2006-08-28 |
Source: | Seattle Times (WA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-13 04:50:02 |
KING COUNTY'S SENSIBLE TAKE ON DRUGS
SEATTLE -- Is it time to forge an "exit strategy" for our prolonged
"war on drugs"? That question -- normally considered a "no-no" in
legal circles, especially among prosecutors and police -- has been
raised by the prestigious King County Bar Association since 2000. And
the results have been impressive.
King County is sending minor street drug users and sellers through
drug courts instead of incarcerating them; its average daily jail
count is down from 2,800 to 2,000. The Washington Legislature was
persuaded to cut back drastically on mandatory drug-possession
sentences, apportioning funds to adult and juvenile drug courts, and
family "dependency" courts. Tens of millions of dollars have been saved.
"This project isn't for fringy, ponytailed pot smokers," insists
Roger Goodman, director of the bar association's Drug Policy Project.
"We did it for the courts. We can't get civil cases heard for three
years. And the drug cases are mostly so petty."
The uncomfortable truth is that despite decades of aggressive
government crackdowns, U.S. drug use and drug-related crime are as
high as ever. Made profitable by prohibition, violent criminal
enterprises that purvey drugs are flourishing. Harsh criminal
sanctions, even for minor drug possession, have packed jails and
prisons. Public coffers have been drained of funds for critical
preventive social services.
Prohibition has failed to stamp out markets and quality, or increase
street prices for cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine and marijuana. The
drug war kicked off by President Nixon in the 1970s costs $40 billion
or more a year. It is a massive, embarrassing, destructive failure.
But politicians are normally afraid to question the system for fear
of being called illegal-drug apologists. So how did the King County
Bar get the ball rolling? "It's the messenger, not the message" --
the credibility of the bar association, says Goodman. The King County
Bar in fact assembled a nationally unprecedented coalition of
supporters, ranging from the Washington State Bar Association to the
King County and Washington state medical associations, the Church
Council of Greater Seattle and the League of Women Voters of Seattle
and Washington.
And the first-stated goals weren't scuttling drug laws. Instead, the
bar association announced its platform as (1) reductions in crime and
disorder -- "to undercut the violent, illegal markets that spawn
disease, crime, corruption, mayhem and death"; (2) improving public
health by stemming the spread of blood-borne diseases; (3) better
protection of children from the harm of drugs, and (4) wiser use of
scarce public resources.
Now the bar association and its allies are asking the Legislature to
establish a commission of experts to design how the state can switch
from punitive approaches to a focus on treatment, shutting down the
criminal gangs that now control the drug trade.
As controversial as it sounds, programs for victims (most likely
adults) of such dangerously addictive drugs as heroin, cocaine and
methamphetamine may be easiest to fashion. Rather than leaving them
to the streets and black market exploitation, there may be ways to
register addicts, provide controlled amounts of drugs in medical
settings, and try to guide them into treatment.
For marijuana, control by cartels that now provide huge quantities
might be broken by state licensing of home production and
non-commercial exchanges. Or a state distribution system like state
liquor stores, demonstrably effective in denying sales to youth,
could be established.
The toughest issues may surround protection of children. Today, it's
noted, they get contradictory messages -- "Take a pill to feel
better," and "Just say no, except when you're 21 and then you can
drink." Youth see commercial advertising pushing a wide variety of
mind-altering, pleasure-inducing substances, even while society
leaves control of so-called "illicit" drugs to criminal gangs. Plus,
kids do like to experiment.
A realistic program could start with respecting young people,
providing them honest information, on uses -- and the demonstrable
dangers -- of alcohol, tobacco and drugs. Goodman notes that in the
13 states where medical use of marijuana is authorized, teen use is
down. "It's not as cool when grandma uses marijuana for cancer pain," he says.
There's surely no risk-free "exit" from today's terribly destructive
drug war. But we have to try -- and should thank communities and
states with the courage to lead.
SEATTLE -- Is it time to forge an "exit strategy" for our prolonged
"war on drugs"? That question -- normally considered a "no-no" in
legal circles, especially among prosecutors and police -- has been
raised by the prestigious King County Bar Association since 2000. And
the results have been impressive.
King County is sending minor street drug users and sellers through
drug courts instead of incarcerating them; its average daily jail
count is down from 2,800 to 2,000. The Washington Legislature was
persuaded to cut back drastically on mandatory drug-possession
sentences, apportioning funds to adult and juvenile drug courts, and
family "dependency" courts. Tens of millions of dollars have been saved.
"This project isn't for fringy, ponytailed pot smokers," insists
Roger Goodman, director of the bar association's Drug Policy Project.
"We did it for the courts. We can't get civil cases heard for three
years. And the drug cases are mostly so petty."
The uncomfortable truth is that despite decades of aggressive
government crackdowns, U.S. drug use and drug-related crime are as
high as ever. Made profitable by prohibition, violent criminal
enterprises that purvey drugs are flourishing. Harsh criminal
sanctions, even for minor drug possession, have packed jails and
prisons. Public coffers have been drained of funds for critical
preventive social services.
Prohibition has failed to stamp out markets and quality, or increase
street prices for cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine and marijuana. The
drug war kicked off by President Nixon in the 1970s costs $40 billion
or more a year. It is a massive, embarrassing, destructive failure.
But politicians are normally afraid to question the system for fear
of being called illegal-drug apologists. So how did the King County
Bar get the ball rolling? "It's the messenger, not the message" --
the credibility of the bar association, says Goodman. The King County
Bar in fact assembled a nationally unprecedented coalition of
supporters, ranging from the Washington State Bar Association to the
King County and Washington state medical associations, the Church
Council of Greater Seattle and the League of Women Voters of Seattle
and Washington.
And the first-stated goals weren't scuttling drug laws. Instead, the
bar association announced its platform as (1) reductions in crime and
disorder -- "to undercut the violent, illegal markets that spawn
disease, crime, corruption, mayhem and death"; (2) improving public
health by stemming the spread of blood-borne diseases; (3) better
protection of children from the harm of drugs, and (4) wiser use of
scarce public resources.
Now the bar association and its allies are asking the Legislature to
establish a commission of experts to design how the state can switch
from punitive approaches to a focus on treatment, shutting down the
criminal gangs that now control the drug trade.
As controversial as it sounds, programs for victims (most likely
adults) of such dangerously addictive drugs as heroin, cocaine and
methamphetamine may be easiest to fashion. Rather than leaving them
to the streets and black market exploitation, there may be ways to
register addicts, provide controlled amounts of drugs in medical
settings, and try to guide them into treatment.
For marijuana, control by cartels that now provide huge quantities
might be broken by state licensing of home production and
non-commercial exchanges. Or a state distribution system like state
liquor stores, demonstrably effective in denying sales to youth,
could be established.
The toughest issues may surround protection of children. Today, it's
noted, they get contradictory messages -- "Take a pill to feel
better," and "Just say no, except when you're 21 and then you can
drink." Youth see commercial advertising pushing a wide variety of
mind-altering, pleasure-inducing substances, even while society
leaves control of so-called "illicit" drugs to criminal gangs. Plus,
kids do like to experiment.
A realistic program could start with respecting young people,
providing them honest information, on uses -- and the demonstrable
dangers -- of alcohol, tobacco and drugs. Goodman notes that in the
13 states where medical use of marijuana is authorized, teen use is
down. "It's not as cool when grandma uses marijuana for cancer pain," he says.
There's surely no risk-free "exit" from today's terribly destructive
drug war. But we have to try -- and should thank communities and
states with the courage to lead.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...