News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Editorial: Prisons Are Not Enough |
Title: | US CA: Editorial: Prisons Are Not Enough |
Published On: | 1999-07-07 |
Source: | Los Angeles Times (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-06 02:35:11 |
PRISONS ARE NOT ENOUGH
On July 4 Gov. Gray Davis signed a bill authorizing the construction of a
mammoth, 2,248-bed maximum security prison just north of Bakersfield. The
bill, he said, would "help to ensure that California remains a state that
demands safety for its citizens and justice from its criminals." However,
just building new prisons has little correlation with public safety and
does nothing to reduce the astronomical costs of incarcerating its 160,000
prisoners.
Prisons don't lock up most offenders and throw away the key. Even with the
three strikes law increasing many sentences, the state's prisons release
about 90,000 people each year into California communities with virtually no
followup, one reason why roughly two thirds of state inmates paroled this
year are likely to return to prison.
Today, the Assembly Appropriations Committee considers a bill that would
aid both safety and justice. The measure, by Sen. Richard Polanco (D Los
Angeles), would require the state Department of Corrections to conduct a
public study of cost effective alternatives to prison building. Taxpayers
currently pay $21,000 a year to imprison each of California's 59,000
nonviolent drug offenders. Most of these drug offenders are addicts who
receive no intensive substance abuse treatment in prison and tend to commit
crimes again, cycling in and out of prison for decades. Polanco's bill
would require the state Corrections Department to study alternatives used
in other states, like requiring the offenders to get into treatment, get
jobs and pay part of their salaries back to the state to fund the drug
treatment programs they attend.
Next week, the Assembly Public Safety Committee will consider a related
bill that would prod the Corrections Department to think more creatively.
The bill, authored by Sen. John Vasconcellos (D Santa Clara), would revise
the state's penal code to declare that the purpose of prisons is
"prevention, rehabilitation and punishment." Two decades ago, the state
removed the term "rehabilitation" from its penal code, making punishment
the sole official purpose of its prisons. If prisoners are to reenter
society, punishment alone is not enough.
Despite a near tripling in the number of state prisons since 1980,
California prisons are overcrowded again, and voters have rejected bond
measures that would have kept the prison building boom rolling. An
exploration of ways to serve justice with fewer new cells is a sensible
public safety policy.
On July 4 Gov. Gray Davis signed a bill authorizing the construction of a
mammoth, 2,248-bed maximum security prison just north of Bakersfield. The
bill, he said, would "help to ensure that California remains a state that
demands safety for its citizens and justice from its criminals." However,
just building new prisons has little correlation with public safety and
does nothing to reduce the astronomical costs of incarcerating its 160,000
prisoners.
Prisons don't lock up most offenders and throw away the key. Even with the
three strikes law increasing many sentences, the state's prisons release
about 90,000 people each year into California communities with virtually no
followup, one reason why roughly two thirds of state inmates paroled this
year are likely to return to prison.
Today, the Assembly Appropriations Committee considers a bill that would
aid both safety and justice. The measure, by Sen. Richard Polanco (D Los
Angeles), would require the state Department of Corrections to conduct a
public study of cost effective alternatives to prison building. Taxpayers
currently pay $21,000 a year to imprison each of California's 59,000
nonviolent drug offenders. Most of these drug offenders are addicts who
receive no intensive substance abuse treatment in prison and tend to commit
crimes again, cycling in and out of prison for decades. Polanco's bill
would require the state Corrections Department to study alternatives used
in other states, like requiring the offenders to get into treatment, get
jobs and pay part of their salaries back to the state to fund the drug
treatment programs they attend.
Next week, the Assembly Public Safety Committee will consider a related
bill that would prod the Corrections Department to think more creatively.
The bill, authored by Sen. John Vasconcellos (D Santa Clara), would revise
the state's penal code to declare that the purpose of prisons is
"prevention, rehabilitation and punishment." Two decades ago, the state
removed the term "rehabilitation" from its penal code, making punishment
the sole official purpose of its prisons. If prisoners are to reenter
society, punishment alone is not enough.
Despite a near tripling in the number of state prisons since 1980,
California prisons are overcrowded again, and voters have rejected bond
measures that would have kept the prison building boom rolling. An
exploration of ways to serve justice with fewer new cells is a sensible
public safety policy.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...