News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Bush: I've Had No Drug For 15 Years |
Title: | US: Bush: I've Had No Drug For 15 Years |
Published On: | 1999-08-20 |
Source: | Independent, The (UK) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-05 22:58:53 |
BUSH: I'VE HAD NO DRUG FOR 15 YEARS
THE REPUBLICAN presidential hopeful George W Bush Jnr suggested yesterday
he might withdraw from the race for the White House if questioning
continued about his use of drugs. Pressed for the third day to answer
allegations that he once took drugs, including cocaine, the favoured
contender for the Republican nomination maintained he had not touched drugs
for at least 15 years.
Mr Bush told an audience in Ohio: "I don't want to participate in American
politics if that's what it takes." At an earlier engagement, in Virginia,
he had tackled the drug issue unprompted for the first time, opening a
press conference with a two-paragraph statement in which he insisted he
would pass the standard background check for White House employees. This
requires disclosure of any drug use in the past seven years.
"Not only could I pass the challenge of a background check and the
standards applied to today's White House," he said, "but I could have
passed the background check and the standards applied on the most stringent
conditions when my dad was President - a 15-year drug-free period."
He continued: "Two decades ago I made some mistakes, when I was younger. I
have learnt from those mistakes. Should I become the President, my
pledge... is that I will uphold the honour and dignity of the office."
Mr Bush's statement was part of a scramble to limit the damage after he
came close to losing his temper with reporters the previous day in the face
of a volley of questions about his alleged drug usage.
Asked by the Dallas Morning News whether, as President, he would insist
White House employees underwent background checks - and whether he would
pass - Mr Bush replied: "As I understand it, the current form asks the
question, `Did somebody use drugs within the last seven years?' And I will
be glad to answer that ... `No'."
The paper printed his response yesterday. Apparently concerned his reply
did not place his alleged drug usage far enough in the past, however, Mr
Bush made his later statement, expanding the denial to cover a full 15
years. It remained unclear whether the period he was referring to meant 15
years from when he might become President (ie January 2001), 15 years from
now, or 15 years before the date of his father's inauguration, January
1989. That interpretation, subsequently embraced by his spokeswoman, would
take his denial back to 1974, when he was 28.
THE REPUBLICAN presidential hopeful George W Bush Jnr suggested yesterday
he might withdraw from the race for the White House if questioning
continued about his use of drugs. Pressed for the third day to answer
allegations that he once took drugs, including cocaine, the favoured
contender for the Republican nomination maintained he had not touched drugs
for at least 15 years.
Mr Bush told an audience in Ohio: "I don't want to participate in American
politics if that's what it takes." At an earlier engagement, in Virginia,
he had tackled the drug issue unprompted for the first time, opening a
press conference with a two-paragraph statement in which he insisted he
would pass the standard background check for White House employees. This
requires disclosure of any drug use in the past seven years.
"Not only could I pass the challenge of a background check and the
standards applied to today's White House," he said, "but I could have
passed the background check and the standards applied on the most stringent
conditions when my dad was President - a 15-year drug-free period."
He continued: "Two decades ago I made some mistakes, when I was younger. I
have learnt from those mistakes. Should I become the President, my
pledge... is that I will uphold the honour and dignity of the office."
Mr Bush's statement was part of a scramble to limit the damage after he
came close to losing his temper with reporters the previous day in the face
of a volley of questions about his alleged drug usage.
Asked by the Dallas Morning News whether, as President, he would insist
White House employees underwent background checks - and whether he would
pass - Mr Bush replied: "As I understand it, the current form asks the
question, `Did somebody use drugs within the last seven years?' And I will
be glad to answer that ... `No'."
The paper printed his response yesterday. Apparently concerned his reply
did not place his alleged drug usage far enough in the past, however, Mr
Bush made his later statement, expanding the denial to cover a full 15
years. It remained unclear whether the period he was referring to meant 15
years from when he might become President (ie January 2001), 15 years from
now, or 15 years before the date of his father's inauguration, January
1989. That interpretation, subsequently embraced by his spokeswoman, would
take his denial back to 1974, when he was 28.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...