Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US KY: Office Drug War Escalating
Title:US KY: Office Drug War Escalating
Published On:1999-09-06
Source:Evansville Courier & Press (IN)
Fetched On:2008-09-05 21:03:15
OFFICE DRUG WAR ESCALATING

Companies Hiring Undercover Agents, Using Tests To Clean Up Workplace

LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- Mike Price's long career with General Motors ended
abruptly with a drug sweep of the company's Corvette plant in Bowling Green.

Price was arrested in the middle of a work shift, and was among 17 workers
led past their peers in handcuffs on the way to being charged with selling
marijuana to an undercover agent posing as a co-worker. Price, a
46-year-old single parent, was fired after nearly 23 years with GM.

"Am I a trafficker in marijuana? No way," Price said. Like most of the GM
workers arrested on May 7, 1998, he maintains his innocence. "If GM thought
I had a drug problem, why didn't they come to me?"

No past policy

In fact, GM had no random drug-testing program, only suspicions. So it used
the drug sweep, and thus joined an increasing number of companies willing
to try any means to stamp out drugs in the workplace.

Despite such efforts, which many view as Draconian, companies across
Kentucky and throughout the nation continue to be confounded by the grip
drugs have on their employees and the workplace, The Courier-Journal
reported Sunday.

Drugs everywhere

In Greater Louisville, an estimated 70,000 people are addicted to a drug,
and less than 10 percent are treated. For reasons ranging from a lack of
programs to a lack of money, an estimated 22,000 people are waiting for
treatment of substance abuse.

And in the Louisville area alone, substance abuse kills 600 people every
year. The problem costs the area more than $630 million in health care,
unemployment, lost productivity, crime and criminal justice expenses and
addiction treatment, according to figures released at last year's
Louisville Drug & Alcohol Treatment Summit.

Price, who said of his firing that "my life is gone now," could attest to
the fact that no one is exempt from being a suspect.

GM will say little about its undercover operation and the subsequent arrests.

"Everyone deserves a workplace that's free of substance abuse," said Kyle
Johnson, GM's spokesman. "We want to make our workplace safe for all of our
employees."

But Price, who is now working a sales job, has gone public in an effort to
clear his name. He has rejected a plea deal that would fine him $50 for
possession.

The corporate plant

Price is still seemingly bewildered by the turn of events and says he never
sold drugs to the undercover agent from a private security company, a young
woman who befriended several co-workers during a 16-month period. GM
brought in the woman when the company began to suspect drug use at the plant.

The company says some workers sold her drugs, including marijuana and
amphetamines.

Attorney Kelly Thompson, who is representing eight of the 17 defendants in
a civil lawsuit filed against GM, said that most of the employees were
fired, one suffered a nervous breakdown and three with specialized skills
eventually returned to work at the plant.

"You could put all the drugs they found in one hand," Thompson said. The
undercover agent "enticed them to bring the drugs to work. The joint would
appear on her workbench, and she'd say, `That's trafficking in marijuana.'"

Other options?

Given what Thompson called the small amount of drugs found, the number of
employees GM had to replace and what Thompson called the questionable
tactics of the undercover officer, he said sending employees to treatment
programs would have made more sense.

So, he said, would drug testing.

"They could have said to the union, `We'd like to do drug testing.' Or,
`We'd like to do random testing.' Or, `We'd like to pick out these people
we suspect and do drug testing,' " Thompson said.

Although their legality has been challenged in the courts, the U.S. Supreme
Court has consistently upheld the rights of companies to require drug
testing as a condition of employment.
Member Comments
No member comments available...