News (Media Awareness Project) - Canada: PUB LTE: Pot Law Tyranny |
Title: | Canada: PUB LTE: Pot Law Tyranny |
Published On: | 1999-10-15 |
Source: | Victoria Times-Colonist (Canada) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-05 17:56:50 |
I take exception with the conclusion of this editorial - that the
marijuana law should either be seriously enforced or scrapped.
In view of the fact that two out of three British Columbian voters
want this law gone (according to a November 1997 Angus Reid poll), the
law should merely be scrapped.
British Columbians are getting very impatient with a law the majority
of our voters do not want, which allows the federal Liberals to cross
the mountains , arrest our citizens and turn them into criminals.
Across the border in Oregon and Washington our neighbours have the
ability to change the law through a citizen initiative (referendum),
and have done so.
We do not have such a luxury in B.C., however, due in part to the fact
that the B.C. initiative process is a fraud. Therefore in B.C. and
Canada we are forced to live with a law the majority does not want.
Are you seriously suggesting that this situation can be allowed to
continue? Most fair minded people would regard the enforcement of a
law that is unwanted by two out of three voters as a tyranny. To
suggest anything other than abolition supports this tyranny.
I strongly suggest you reconsider. The issue here is no longer
marijuana - It is the principle of democracy itself.
Chuck Beyer
Victoria, B.C.
marijuana law should either be seriously enforced or scrapped.
In view of the fact that two out of three British Columbian voters
want this law gone (according to a November 1997 Angus Reid poll), the
law should merely be scrapped.
British Columbians are getting very impatient with a law the majority
of our voters do not want, which allows the federal Liberals to cross
the mountains , arrest our citizens and turn them into criminals.
Across the border in Oregon and Washington our neighbours have the
ability to change the law through a citizen initiative (referendum),
and have done so.
We do not have such a luxury in B.C., however, due in part to the fact
that the B.C. initiative process is a fraud. Therefore in B.C. and
Canada we are forced to live with a law the majority does not want.
Are you seriously suggesting that this situation can be allowed to
continue? Most fair minded people would regard the enforcement of a
law that is unwanted by two out of three voters as a tyranny. To
suggest anything other than abolition supports this tyranny.
I strongly suggest you reconsider. The issue here is no longer
marijuana - It is the principle of democracy itself.
Chuck Beyer
Victoria, B.C.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...