ONE CANNOT OVERCOME A DRUG CONVICTION

What do the following public figures have in common? William Jefferson
Clinton, George W. Bush, Joe Kernan, Mitch Daniels, Al Gore, Rush
Limbaugh. Answer: They have all used illicit drugs or been addicted to
licit drugs.

In a recent debate here in Indiana, Governor Kernan mentioned his youthful
use. Mitch Daniels has been dodging issues related to a drug law arrest
many years ago. The only other candidate for governor in Indiana, Kenn
Gividen, has never use alcohol or illicit drugs. Kernan and Daniels' use
was passed off to youthful indiscretions, of no current importance.

However, that brushes aside a quite serious problem, not only here in
Indiana, but the entire country, namely what really happens today to those
arrested on drug law violations. Laws addressing drug law violations
result in multiple punishments for even minor infractions.

Dorothy Gaines from Mobile, Alabama, lived with a man addicted to cocaine.
His supplier was busted, snitched on Dorothy's mate, who in turn snitched
on her. In both cases the snitches were in order to receive lighter
sentencing. Dorothy had no one on whom to snitch, but more significantly
did not use, deal or condone drug use. Yet, on the basis of this other
testimony, she was convicted and sentenced to 19 years in federal jail in
Tallahassee, Florida. Her three children were cast aside to live with
incompetent relatives.

After serving seven years, her sentence was commuted (no pardon) by
President Clinton. She was technically free. However, she is unable to
gain employment, cannot receive public assistance, does not qualify for an
educational loan, and in fact cannot even visit her own relatives who live
in public housing. She told me she is in some ways more of a prisoner
today than while incarcerated.

I do not use or condone alcohol, tobacco or drug use, but do subscribe to
the Libertarian philosophy that drug use is an individual decision and of
no interest to the 'state." Furthermore, it should only be regulated as
are alcohol and tobacco, which cause much more devastation to the general
health of the public and many more deaths that illicit drug use.

Current policies regarding drug and alcohol (ab)use in America are
generally fault and punishment based. While it might be attractive for a
public official to sound "tough on crime," this approach does not reduce
substance/alcohol use, improve or save lives.

It is time to ask our civic leaders: What are our goals regarding drug use
in America? What are the scientific facts regarding prevention and harm
reduction? How do these facts compare in outcomes to fault based penal
'solutions'?

Do we want less drug use, or more people punished for drug use? What are
the corollaries between alcohol prohibition of the 1930's and drug
prohibition of today? Why did it take a constitutional amendment to make
alcohol illegal, but not the currently illicit drugs?

What civil liberties do we surrender in the name of the war on drugs? What
is the true economic cost of the war on drugs? What are the experiences in
other countries with limited legalization, maintenance therapy and safe
injection rooms?

Why do we prohibit clean needle exchanges, one of the leading reasons
America is one of the few industrial countries in the world with a
continually rising HIV infection rate (due to injection drug use)?

Marijuana has proven medical benefits, has been authorized for use in nine
states, so why does the US Justice Department still seriously persecute,
prosecute, and incarcerate medical marijuana users and providers? For that
matter why is marijuana still a Schedule I drug?

One of my favorite quotes is from Jack Locke, founder of LEAP (Law
Enforcement Against Prohibition): "One can overcome a drug addiction but
not a drug conviction!"

Clark Brittain is a Bloomington obstetrician.