News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Editorial: Legal Pot User Should Be Entitled |
Title: | US CA: Editorial: Legal Pot User Should Be Entitled |
Published On: | 2000-01-13 |
Source: | Redding Record Searchlight (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-05 06:45:05 |
LEGAL POT USER SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO HIS 'MEDICINE'
We're having a difficult time understanding why the Shasta County Sheriff's
Department is reluctant to give back marijuana belonging to medicinal user
Richard Levin. The word ''absurd'' comes to mind. So does the old joke about
''Who's on first?''
Superior Court Judge Bradley Boeckman signed an order for the drug's return
to Levin, an order drafted by the Shasta County district attorney's office.
But whoa. Hold on. At the last minute an objection was registered by the
Sheriff's Department. Sheriff Jim Pope apparently wants an opinion from the
county counsel's office to determine whether a sheriff can legally return
the drug as ordered by Judge Boeckman. The judge, we understand, is willing
to consider a new motion on whether the 41 small plants growing in Levin's
yard and 1 pounds of marijuana should be returned.
Levin recently went through a jury trial after being charged with having
marijuana for sale and was found innocent last month. Levin had a doctor's
permission to use pot for back problems and believed he was complying with
the 1996 state voter-approved Proposition 215 medicinal marijuana initiative
when he was arrested in May, 1998.
While Levin is confident he'll eventually get back the worthless, dried-up
plants and stale pot, he doesn't appreciate the hassle of another court
hearing.
''It seems plain wrong to hold this man's medicine,'' said Levin's attorney,
Eric Berg of Redding.
A precedent already has been established in California requiring law
enforcement agencies to return marijuana in cases of medical necessity. We
refer one and all to a November 1998 decision when the California Supreme
Court justices unanimously agreed that officers in Mendocino County had to
return pot taken from an ill couple. In that case, the state attorney
general's office objected because it thought officers would be committing a
federal crime by furnishing a federally banned substance to private
citizens. The justices on the high state court thought otherwise. And
somehow we can't imagine Sheriff Pope getting arrested for following Judge
Boeckman's order.
Getting acquitted of the sales charge apparently wasn't enough. Now Levin
has another, unfair fight to get his marijuana back. The case is over and he
should get back what is rightfully his.
We're having a difficult time understanding why the Shasta County Sheriff's
Department is reluctant to give back marijuana belonging to medicinal user
Richard Levin. The word ''absurd'' comes to mind. So does the old joke about
''Who's on first?''
Superior Court Judge Bradley Boeckman signed an order for the drug's return
to Levin, an order drafted by the Shasta County district attorney's office.
But whoa. Hold on. At the last minute an objection was registered by the
Sheriff's Department. Sheriff Jim Pope apparently wants an opinion from the
county counsel's office to determine whether a sheriff can legally return
the drug as ordered by Judge Boeckman. The judge, we understand, is willing
to consider a new motion on whether the 41 small plants growing in Levin's
yard and 1 pounds of marijuana should be returned.
Levin recently went through a jury trial after being charged with having
marijuana for sale and was found innocent last month. Levin had a doctor's
permission to use pot for back problems and believed he was complying with
the 1996 state voter-approved Proposition 215 medicinal marijuana initiative
when he was arrested in May, 1998.
While Levin is confident he'll eventually get back the worthless, dried-up
plants and stale pot, he doesn't appreciate the hassle of another court
hearing.
''It seems plain wrong to hold this man's medicine,'' said Levin's attorney,
Eric Berg of Redding.
A precedent already has been established in California requiring law
enforcement agencies to return marijuana in cases of medical necessity. We
refer one and all to a November 1998 decision when the California Supreme
Court justices unanimously agreed that officers in Mendocino County had to
return pot taken from an ill couple. In that case, the state attorney
general's office objected because it thought officers would be committing a
federal crime by furnishing a federally banned substance to private
citizens. The justices on the high state court thought otherwise. And
somehow we can't imagine Sheriff Pope getting arrested for following Judge
Boeckman's order.
Getting acquitted of the sales charge apparently wasn't enough. Now Levin
has another, unfair fight to get his marijuana back. The case is over and he
should get back what is rightfully his.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...