News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: LAPD Reeling As Corruption Cases Multiply |
Title: | US CA: LAPD Reeling As Corruption Cases Multiply |
Published On: | 2000-02-12 |
Source: | Washington Post (DC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-05 03:57:13 |
LAPD REELING AS CORRUPTION CASES MULTIPLY
Probe Finds False Arrests, Other Abuses Widespread
LOS ANGELES - So many lies, false arrests, dirty cops and wrongful
convictions are being exposed in the latest scandal engulfing this city's
police force that it is getting hard to keep up with all of the corruption.
The tally of abuse and deceit increases almost every week.
The police chief now says that rogue officers in a neighborhood overrun
with gangs framed at least 99 people during the past three years by
planting drugs or guns on them, and also may have reveled in shooting a few
unarmed suspects.
The district attorney is investigating whether hundreds of criminal cases,
all linked to the growing list of police officers under suspicion, may be
tainted or fake.
At last count, 32 criminal convictions have been overturned.
And so far 20 officers have been fired, suspended, or have quit.
It is one of the most corrosive police corruption cases ever in Los
Angeles, it rivals similarly sordid tales that have plagued other big-city
police forces lately, and by all accounts the probe of it has only just
scratched the surface.
"An evil cancer has been found inside the LAPD," said Steven Yagman, an
attorney representing several dozen people allegedly assaulted or framed by
officers. "I've never seen anything like this all at once. We've got boxes
filled with these stories. This is a bad, bad thing, and the city knows it."
The scandal, which came to light last fall, has grown so large that last
week Police Chief Bernard C. Parks told city council members that settling
lawsuits could cost $125 million. That sum is twice what Los Angeles
budgets each year for liability.
Reeling from that disclosure, some city officials have begun discussing
whether to put a bond measure on the ballot and ask voters whose faith in
the police department has been shaken badly--again--to help pay the huge
cost of cleaning up the force. Nine more criminal cases linked to a new set
of officers being investigated were thrown out last week, and a fifth
innocent person who had been sent to prison on phony drug dealing charges
was set free.
Los Angeles County District Attorney Gil Garcetti is promising another wave
of overturned convictions soon. "The investigation has clearly expanded,"
said Victoria Pipkin, a spokeswoman for his office. "We're still in the
early stages, but we believe that when the smoke from this settles, it will
entail many more than 99" people framed.
In many ways the scandal is the same old damning story for the LAPD, which
has often been its own worst enemy in the last decade, from the beating of
Rodney King caught on videotape to its disastrous handling of the city's
riots and detective Mark Fuhrman's perjury in the O.J. Simpson murder trial.
One former officer, Rafael A. Perez, is the focus of the latest probe. He
has told investigators that he and a partner shot an unarmed 19-year-old
man, planted a gun on him, then testified that he threatened them with an
assault weapon during a stakeout on gang turf.
The man, Javier Francisco Ovando, was sentenced to 23 years in prison. He
was freed one week after the scandal broke. He may be confined to a
wheelchair for life because of the shooting.
In another incident just disclosed, Perez said that he and other officers
shot an unarmed 21-year-old gang member they had been chasing through an
apartment building, then delayed calling an ambulance while they planted a
gun on the scene to make the shooting look justified. The man, Juan
Saldana, later died.
And this is just the beginning of the sensational stories Perez has had to
tell. He is helping investigators in exchange for leniency on charges of
stealing cocaine from a police evidence locker.
According to Perez's account, much of which police say they are
corroborating, planting drugs, lying under oath in court, using brute force
and conducting illegal searches have been common in one of the department's
elite anti-gang units known as CRASH. It stands for Community Resources
Against Street Hoodlums, one of the city's primary weapons in the long
battle against gang violence.
Police say Perez has told them that in their zeal to bust suspected gang
members, he and other officers sometimes carried stashes of drugs when they
patrolled, to make a frame-up quick and easy.
In investigative transcripts obtained by the Los Angeles Times this week,
he also says CRASH members sometimes gave each other a plaque after
shooting a suspected gang member, such as Ovando. In one instance, he said
officers betrayed a confidential informant in front of fellow gang members,
knowing he could get beaten, or worse.
Until last week, all of the overturned convictions had direct links to
Perez. But in a sign of how the probe is widening, Perez was not the
arresting officer in any of the nine latest criminal cases just thrown out
by a judge because they involved phony drug charges. Dozens of officers and
their supervisors in the department's Rampart Division near downtown, where
Perez was assigned, are under suspicion for the same misconduct, or for
looking the other way.
And police have not said that they are certain the corruption is confined
to Rampart.
In the ranks, the scandal has been devastating. Sgt. Armando Perez, who has
been assigned to the Rampart Division for six years, said officers feel
betrayed by their colleagues, frustrated by the pace of the investigation
and worried that they could be made scapegoats by a department under
pressure to clean house.
On the streets and in court, Perez said, officers also sense their
credibility is in shambles, or gone.
"All the hard work we do is in question now," said Perez, who is one of
about 400 officers at Rampart. "At trials, the first thing that defense
attorneys are asking officers when they take the stand is, 'Are you
assigned to Rampart?' "
The scandal is also dividing the community around the Rampart Division.
Home to many newly arrived Mexican and Central American immigrants, some
illegally, it is a bustling part of Los Angeles that is all grit, no glitz.
At least 20 gangs roam its narrow alleys and tightly packed, low-rise
apartment buildings, warring over turf and drug sales. Rampart is one of
the police department's biggest and busiest precincts.
Residents are not defending officers admitting to misconduct, but some
still say they support the harsh attitude that the force flaunts on the
streets. Its crackdown on gangs, they say, is saving the neighborhood.
"Three years ago, it was really bad here, but it's gotten a little better,"
said Santiago Ramirez, 31, a maintenance supervisor. "The police have
helped me out a few times. I have nothing to say against them."
But a few protests have been staged at Rampart, and some community leaders
say the investigation into the renegade style of officers is long overdue.
Fearing reprisals, many others are angry but reluctant to criticize police.
They say they now fear some officers as much or more than gangs.
"If you have dark hair, a moustache and a car, the police will harass you,"
said a Hispanic man in his twenties as he worked in a local shop.
"People are afraid," said a middle-aged man who has lived in the area for
five years. "They've seen and heard what can happen if you don't stay on
the good side of the police."
Carol Watson, a leader of a local nonprofit group called Police Watch,
which monitors the department and has been working with the community
around Rampart, said that since so many residents are newcomers from other
countries, they have almost accepted police abuse as a fact of life.
"There's disillusionment, but mostly people are just numb to it," she said.
"From what we're hearing, these things with police happened all the time."
Parks has assigned nearly 50 officers to the Rampart probe. Some have gone
as far as Mexico and Guatemala to interview possible victims of police
misconduct. The chief is urging Garcetti to prosecute three officers, and
recently he announced that cases involving 52 defendants are so "severely
tainted" they should be dismissed at once.
To date, a core question has gone unanswered: What went wrong? Some
officials who have studied the LAPD say that it has instilled a
by-any-means-necessary mentality in officers fighting gangs. Other city
leaders wonder whether a rush to beef up the force - the department added
about 2,000 officers in the past six years--has hurt training. Similar
moves in other cities, including the District, have led to serious policing
problems. But the scandal here is not focused on patrol officers.
"We're talking about highly specialized units this time," said Merrick
Bobb, an analyst of policing practices who has investigated the LAPD. "You
would think that the department would be able to carefully select officers
for that kind of assignment."
What the department needs most, some say, is stronger civilian oversight.
But other community leaders contend that little will change until more
officers break codes of silence, report misconduct and face no recriminations.
In the meantime, the corruption probe wears on. Garcetti said recently that
it could take months, even years, to resolve. The department is being
besieged by lawsuits.
At Yagman's firm, business is so brisk that lawyers are being hired just to
work on potential cases against the LAPD. On the firm's Web site, he also
recently posted a new list from Garcetti of people whose convictions
involved officers now under investigation. It has several thousand names.
Special correspondent Neal Becton contributed to this report.
Probe Finds False Arrests, Other Abuses Widespread
LOS ANGELES - So many lies, false arrests, dirty cops and wrongful
convictions are being exposed in the latest scandal engulfing this city's
police force that it is getting hard to keep up with all of the corruption.
The tally of abuse and deceit increases almost every week.
The police chief now says that rogue officers in a neighborhood overrun
with gangs framed at least 99 people during the past three years by
planting drugs or guns on them, and also may have reveled in shooting a few
unarmed suspects.
The district attorney is investigating whether hundreds of criminal cases,
all linked to the growing list of police officers under suspicion, may be
tainted or fake.
At last count, 32 criminal convictions have been overturned.
And so far 20 officers have been fired, suspended, or have quit.
It is one of the most corrosive police corruption cases ever in Los
Angeles, it rivals similarly sordid tales that have plagued other big-city
police forces lately, and by all accounts the probe of it has only just
scratched the surface.
"An evil cancer has been found inside the LAPD," said Steven Yagman, an
attorney representing several dozen people allegedly assaulted or framed by
officers. "I've never seen anything like this all at once. We've got boxes
filled with these stories. This is a bad, bad thing, and the city knows it."
The scandal, which came to light last fall, has grown so large that last
week Police Chief Bernard C. Parks told city council members that settling
lawsuits could cost $125 million. That sum is twice what Los Angeles
budgets each year for liability.
Reeling from that disclosure, some city officials have begun discussing
whether to put a bond measure on the ballot and ask voters whose faith in
the police department has been shaken badly--again--to help pay the huge
cost of cleaning up the force. Nine more criminal cases linked to a new set
of officers being investigated were thrown out last week, and a fifth
innocent person who had been sent to prison on phony drug dealing charges
was set free.
Los Angeles County District Attorney Gil Garcetti is promising another wave
of overturned convictions soon. "The investigation has clearly expanded,"
said Victoria Pipkin, a spokeswoman for his office. "We're still in the
early stages, but we believe that when the smoke from this settles, it will
entail many more than 99" people framed.
In many ways the scandal is the same old damning story for the LAPD, which
has often been its own worst enemy in the last decade, from the beating of
Rodney King caught on videotape to its disastrous handling of the city's
riots and detective Mark Fuhrman's perjury in the O.J. Simpson murder trial.
One former officer, Rafael A. Perez, is the focus of the latest probe. He
has told investigators that he and a partner shot an unarmed 19-year-old
man, planted a gun on him, then testified that he threatened them with an
assault weapon during a stakeout on gang turf.
The man, Javier Francisco Ovando, was sentenced to 23 years in prison. He
was freed one week after the scandal broke. He may be confined to a
wheelchair for life because of the shooting.
In another incident just disclosed, Perez said that he and other officers
shot an unarmed 21-year-old gang member they had been chasing through an
apartment building, then delayed calling an ambulance while they planted a
gun on the scene to make the shooting look justified. The man, Juan
Saldana, later died.
And this is just the beginning of the sensational stories Perez has had to
tell. He is helping investigators in exchange for leniency on charges of
stealing cocaine from a police evidence locker.
According to Perez's account, much of which police say they are
corroborating, planting drugs, lying under oath in court, using brute force
and conducting illegal searches have been common in one of the department's
elite anti-gang units known as CRASH. It stands for Community Resources
Against Street Hoodlums, one of the city's primary weapons in the long
battle against gang violence.
Police say Perez has told them that in their zeal to bust suspected gang
members, he and other officers sometimes carried stashes of drugs when they
patrolled, to make a frame-up quick and easy.
In investigative transcripts obtained by the Los Angeles Times this week,
he also says CRASH members sometimes gave each other a plaque after
shooting a suspected gang member, such as Ovando. In one instance, he said
officers betrayed a confidential informant in front of fellow gang members,
knowing he could get beaten, or worse.
Until last week, all of the overturned convictions had direct links to
Perez. But in a sign of how the probe is widening, Perez was not the
arresting officer in any of the nine latest criminal cases just thrown out
by a judge because they involved phony drug charges. Dozens of officers and
their supervisors in the department's Rampart Division near downtown, where
Perez was assigned, are under suspicion for the same misconduct, or for
looking the other way.
And police have not said that they are certain the corruption is confined
to Rampart.
In the ranks, the scandal has been devastating. Sgt. Armando Perez, who has
been assigned to the Rampart Division for six years, said officers feel
betrayed by their colleagues, frustrated by the pace of the investigation
and worried that they could be made scapegoats by a department under
pressure to clean house.
On the streets and in court, Perez said, officers also sense their
credibility is in shambles, or gone.
"All the hard work we do is in question now," said Perez, who is one of
about 400 officers at Rampart. "At trials, the first thing that defense
attorneys are asking officers when they take the stand is, 'Are you
assigned to Rampart?' "
The scandal is also dividing the community around the Rampart Division.
Home to many newly arrived Mexican and Central American immigrants, some
illegally, it is a bustling part of Los Angeles that is all grit, no glitz.
At least 20 gangs roam its narrow alleys and tightly packed, low-rise
apartment buildings, warring over turf and drug sales. Rampart is one of
the police department's biggest and busiest precincts.
Residents are not defending officers admitting to misconduct, but some
still say they support the harsh attitude that the force flaunts on the
streets. Its crackdown on gangs, they say, is saving the neighborhood.
"Three years ago, it was really bad here, but it's gotten a little better,"
said Santiago Ramirez, 31, a maintenance supervisor. "The police have
helped me out a few times. I have nothing to say against them."
But a few protests have been staged at Rampart, and some community leaders
say the investigation into the renegade style of officers is long overdue.
Fearing reprisals, many others are angry but reluctant to criticize police.
They say they now fear some officers as much or more than gangs.
"If you have dark hair, a moustache and a car, the police will harass you,"
said a Hispanic man in his twenties as he worked in a local shop.
"People are afraid," said a middle-aged man who has lived in the area for
five years. "They've seen and heard what can happen if you don't stay on
the good side of the police."
Carol Watson, a leader of a local nonprofit group called Police Watch,
which monitors the department and has been working with the community
around Rampart, said that since so many residents are newcomers from other
countries, they have almost accepted police abuse as a fact of life.
"There's disillusionment, but mostly people are just numb to it," she said.
"From what we're hearing, these things with police happened all the time."
Parks has assigned nearly 50 officers to the Rampart probe. Some have gone
as far as Mexico and Guatemala to interview possible victims of police
misconduct. The chief is urging Garcetti to prosecute three officers, and
recently he announced that cases involving 52 defendants are so "severely
tainted" they should be dismissed at once.
To date, a core question has gone unanswered: What went wrong? Some
officials who have studied the LAPD say that it has instilled a
by-any-means-necessary mentality in officers fighting gangs. Other city
leaders wonder whether a rush to beef up the force - the department added
about 2,000 officers in the past six years--has hurt training. Similar
moves in other cities, including the District, have led to serious policing
problems. But the scandal here is not focused on patrol officers.
"We're talking about highly specialized units this time," said Merrick
Bobb, an analyst of policing practices who has investigated the LAPD. "You
would think that the department would be able to carefully select officers
for that kind of assignment."
What the department needs most, some say, is stronger civilian oversight.
But other community leaders contend that little will change until more
officers break codes of silence, report misconduct and face no recriminations.
In the meantime, the corruption probe wears on. Garcetti said recently that
it could take months, even years, to resolve. The department is being
besieged by lawsuits.
At Yagman's firm, business is so brisk that lawyers are being hired just to
work on potential cases against the LAPD. On the firm's Web site, he also
recently posted a new list from Garcetti of people whose convictions
involved officers now under investigation. It has several thousand names.
Special correspondent Neal Becton contributed to this report.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...