Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: 800 Words: Just Say Maybe
Title:US CA: 800 Words: Just Say Maybe
Published On:2006-09-24
Source:Los Angeles Times (CA)
Fetched On:2008-01-13 02:39:29
800 WORDS

JUST SAY MAYBE

A couple of months ago I was at a Hollywood party -- except it was in
Silver Lake -- when two attractive, daughter-aged women came in with
a large trash bag, which turned out to contain about three pounds of
extremely exotic, highly fissile marijuana. They dumped the bag out
on a coffee table right in front of me.

The party, a rather listless affair until then, perked right up.

I will spare you my college days' dope-alogue. Suffice to say this
wasn't the most ganja I'd ever seen in one place, by about 1,000
pounds. But it had been two decades since I seriously contemplated a
table full of brain salad, and I was impressed. And surprised. People
still get high?

Illicit drug use peaked in the late 1970s -- I can only take partial
credit -- and has declined more or less steadily since. According to
the government's 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, about
20 million Americans age 12 or older, or 8.1% of the population, are
illicit drug users, and that figure has been stable for the past four
years. Marijuana is by far the most used illicit drug, with about 6%
of the population (14.6 million) toking up on a regular basis. Yet
marijuana use among young people has leveled off, and among kids 12
to 17 is dropping sharply.

The only headline news from the government's report, released this
month, was that drug use among baby boomers is up sharply, 63% since
2002, with marijuana being the drug of choice.

Well, I had a premonition of these statistics when I was sitting
around the coffee table, the oldest person there by about a lifetime.
It seems I was the only one who knew how to twist a proper spliff.
Without quite realizing it, I had become a folklorist of weed.

Just in case you're wondering, no, I don't smoke dope. The last time
I imbibed, my babbling head fell off my shoulders and rolled into a
raging river of paranoia. The pot I smoked in my youth was the
crassest variety of skunkweed compared with the hydroponically grown,
genetically engineered King Kong super-doobage available today. But I
am not surprised that my fellow boomers are finding their way back to
those verdant fields. For one thing, they are at the peak of their
earning potential, and marijuana is expensive. How ironic that the
weed of the people should become yet another perk of the high-net-worth set.

I'm struck, also, by the unspoken implication of the government's
figures. If marijuana use is so devastating to one's life prospects,
how is it these boomers have managed to survive so long and prosper
so well as to take up the habit later in life? We should be watchful
and concerned about drug useincluding alcohol and nicotineamong
pre-adults, but I find it almost impossible to care if a 50-year-old
suburbanite draws on a bong after dinner.

There's a pop culture corollary at work here too. Back in the late
1970s, public figuresentertainers, politicians, even legislatorswere
often quite open about their drug experimentation. The language of
advertising invoked drug use: "get high" on this or that. Drug-themed
comedians became mainstream stars. It may be hard to convince your
kids, but Cheech and Chong sold a comedy LP packaged with oversized
rolling papers.

Then came the moral hysteria of America's War on Drugs, and
previously confessed casual marijuana users went silent. Politicians
such as Bill Clinton and George W. Bush became hilariously
uncomfortable when confronted with questions of their past drug use.
Such were the days of the Green Scare.

But I've noticed that-- perhaps because the War on Drugs has been
supplanted by another casus belli, the War on Terrorthe moral
hysteria surrounding drug use has trickled down to a mere agitation.
Also, the "war on . . ." modality has proved faulty. A recent review
of the government's eight-year, $1.4-billion anti-marijuana
advertising campaign noted that the ads actually increased the
likelihood of first-time drug use among teens. Oops.

The point is, prohibitionists are losing ground. Years ago we passed
Proposition 215, allowing the use of medical marijuana. On Gov.
Schwarzenegger's desk now is Assembly Bill 1147, which would end the
prohibition against the cultivation of industrial hemp, one of the
world's most useful crops.

Meanwhile, the casual use of marijuana is back in the pop mainstream.
This might be because the people who make entertainment in this
country belong to the reefer-baptized bubble of boomers. There's no
better example than the Showtime series "Weeds," whose main character
is a suburban mom peddling pot out of her tract home.

"Weeds" obviously is satirical, but of what? The surface-obsessed
banalities of haute bourgeoisie? Sure. But it also lampoons the
overblown panic that has led people to breezily associate marijuana
use with the slippery slope of heroin addiction.

This idea -- that marijuana was the demon seed of worse addictions --
seems positively quaint these days. Marijuana is not a gateway drug.
It's the drug of gated communities.
Member Comments
No member comments available...