News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Senate Would Limit Government Seizure Of Assets |
Title: | US: Senate Would Limit Government Seizure Of Assets |
Published On: | 2000-03-28 |
Source: | Los Angeles Times (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-04 23:29:10 |
SENATE WOULD LIMIT GOVERNMENT SEIZURE OF ASSETS
WASHINGTON--The Senate passed legislation Monday that puts curbs on
the federal government's ability to seize private property suspected
of being linked to crime.
The voice vote in the Senate sends the asset-forfeiture bill to the
House, where it has the backing of House Judiciary Committee Chairman
Henry J. Hyde (R-Ill.).
The aim of the legislation is to alter a crime-fighting practice that
has resulted in the seizure of hundreds of millions of dollars in
property, mainly from suspected drug traffickers, but has also led to
cases where innocent people are deprived of their homes, cars and boats.
The bill, said Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), would "protect the
legitimate constitutional rights of American citizens while at the
same time protecting this tremendous asset to law enforcement."
The legislation would shift the burden of proof in asset-forfeiture
cases from the property owner to the government.
A version of the bill that passed the House in June, 375 to 48, says
that the government must have "clear and convincing evidence" that
property is being used in an illegal act.
But the administration said that set too high a bar for federal
prosecutors, and some senators agreed. A compromise says the
government must make its case "by a preponderance of the evidence."
The bill also extends the time a property owner has to challenge a
seizure in court, ends the requirement that a person seeking to
recover property post a bond with the court and enables a judge to
release property to the owner if continued government possession poses
a substantial hardship.
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, ranking Democrat on the Senate
Judiciary Committee, said asset forfeiture has been a "particularly
potent weapon in the war on drugs." But abuses have occurred, he said,
when "prosecutorial zeal skirts the boundaries of due process, leading
to the taking of private property regardless of whether the owner is
innocent of, or even cognizant of, the property's use in an illegal
act."
WASHINGTON--The Senate passed legislation Monday that puts curbs on
the federal government's ability to seize private property suspected
of being linked to crime.
The voice vote in the Senate sends the asset-forfeiture bill to the
House, where it has the backing of House Judiciary Committee Chairman
Henry J. Hyde (R-Ill.).
The aim of the legislation is to alter a crime-fighting practice that
has resulted in the seizure of hundreds of millions of dollars in
property, mainly from suspected drug traffickers, but has also led to
cases where innocent people are deprived of their homes, cars and boats.
The bill, said Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), would "protect the
legitimate constitutional rights of American citizens while at the
same time protecting this tremendous asset to law enforcement."
The legislation would shift the burden of proof in asset-forfeiture
cases from the property owner to the government.
A version of the bill that passed the House in June, 375 to 48, says
that the government must have "clear and convincing evidence" that
property is being used in an illegal act.
But the administration said that set too high a bar for federal
prosecutors, and some senators agreed. A compromise says the
government must make its case "by a preponderance of the evidence."
The bill also extends the time a property owner has to challenge a
seizure in court, ends the requirement that a person seeking to
recover property post a bond with the court and enables a judge to
release property to the owner if continued government possession poses
a substantial hardship.
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, ranking Democrat on the Senate
Judiciary Committee, said asset forfeiture has been a "particularly
potent weapon in the war on drugs." But abuses have occurred, he said,
when "prosecutorial zeal skirts the boundaries of due process, leading
to the taking of private property regardless of whether the owner is
innocent of, or even cognizant of, the property's use in an illegal
act."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...