NARCOTICS CASE ANGERS COLOMBIANS

U.S. Anti-Drug Official Snared In Racket Faces 18-Month Term

BOGOTA, Colombia -- Some prominent Colombians are outraged that a U.S. Army
colonel who helped his wife hide drug-trafficking profits last year while he
headed U.S. counter-drug operations in Colombia may get only a slap on the
wrist -- an 18-month jail term or less.

SHAME screamed the cover of a recent Semana news magazine. A lengthy article
inside lashed out at U.S. ``double standards'' on drug issues.

Colombia's top crime fighter, Prosecutor General Alfonso Gomez Mendez,
accused Washington of hypocrisy.

``This would surely be a scandal for Colombia if a sentence of this
magnitude were handed down for a crime of this nature,'' Gomez Mendez said.

Federal Judge Edward R. Korman told U.S. Army Col. James C. Hiett at a
hearing last week in New York City that he will follow federal sentencing
rules and give Hiett a 12- to 18-month prison term June 23.

Hiett was the senior military officer at the U.S. Embassy in Bogota last
June when U.S. prosecutors accused his wife, Laurie Anne Hiett, of using the
U.S. Embassy mail system to send six packages of cocaine and heroin to an
accused drug dealer in Brooklyn. The packages contained narcotics with a
total street value of $750,000.

At the time, U.S. military officials said Hiett told them he knew nothing of
his wife's activities.

COLONEL CONFESSES

But at a hearing last week, Hiett dropped the denials and admitted to the
federal judge that his wife had given him ``in excess of $25,000'' in the
spring of 1999 after making several quick trips to New York City and that he
failed to tell investigators about the cash.

``In April and May of 1999, I used approximately $14,000 of cash to pay
various personal bills. The remaining $11,000 in cash remained in my
possession in Bogota,'' Hiett told the judge.

Hiett, 48, said he did not suspect the money was dirty until Army
investigators told him in early June that his wife had sent drugs from
Colombia to New York City.

Even so, Hiett told the judge, ``I then took steps to dissipate this cash by
paying bills . . . and depositing some of the cash in our accounts.''

Hiett admitted to using some of the drug cash to pay hotel bills in June in
Boca Raton and in Myrtle Beach, S.C., a Visa card bill and to buy several
money orders to deposit the funds in bank accounts in his name and his
wife's.

At the hearing, Hiett pleaded guilty to a crime known as misprision of a
felony, which is the criminal failure to tell authorities that his wife was
laundering drug-trafficking profits by carrying cash from the United States
to Colombia.

PERCEIVED IMBALANCE

Why Hiett was not charged with a more serious felony is not clear.

``I can't comment on what the charging options were,'' assistant U.S.
Attorney Lee G. Dunst said in a telephone interview from his New York City
office.

Laurie Hiett faces sentencing May 5 on 13 counts of drug trafficking, and
may receive between seven and nine years in prison.

Over the past decade, Washington has often criticized Colombia for sentences
as low as six years given to leaders of the Medellin and Cali cartels,
although prison terms were stiffened in 1997.

Gomez Mendez, the Colombian prosecutor, said he respects U.S. sovereignty in
giving prison terms to confessed felons but that the two nations should
maintain ``a principle of reciprocity'' in jail terms.

``The case is disgraceful,'' wrote columnist Antonio Caballero, who said he
believes Colombian authorities are biting their tongues in anger as they
await approval of a $1.3 billion proposed U.S. counter-narcotics package
currently tied up on Capitol Hill.

POLICE CHIEF ANGRY

National police chief Rosso Jose Serrano, praised by Washington as a valiant
drug fighter, also lashed out at the sentence, describing it as
discouraging.

Gen. Charles Wilhelm, head of the Miami-based U.S. Southern Command,
declined to discuss the controversy Wednesday during a visit to Bogota.

``That's a matter between the Hietts and the civil courts,'' Wilhelm said.
``I think it's inappropriate for me to comment.''

A U.S. congressional staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said he
found it embarrassing to respond to Colombian officials asking about the
case during a recent trip.

``I can certainly see where the Colombians would be mad,'' he said. ``I'd be
mad if it were the other way around.''