News (Media Awareness Project) - UK: LTE: Don't Ignore Drug's Dangers |
Title: | UK: LTE: Don't Ignore Drug's Dangers |
Published On: | 2000-06-30 |
Source: | Evening Courier (UK) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-03 17:46:59 |
DON'T IGNORE DRUG'S DANGERS
AS A parent and reader of the "Evening Courier" I wish to complain about
your recent misleading article ("Cannabis calmed fans", June 14).
I think you have a responsibility to ensure that all articles are properly
balanced and do not give the wrong impression; after all your circulation
does include a cross-section of the community, including many young people
who may well be currently undertaking examinations.
I found the article to be one sided, actually promoting cannabis as a ways
and means of successfully calming football fans, and suggesting that
legalised use of cannabis was a benefit.
It also made comparisons with alcohol, a classic way of putting forward
soft drugs as being "OK, man".
It did not mention the unknown health hazards that cannabis users are
submitting themselves to. Many users are seriously debilitated for the
rest of their lives.
Nor did it mention the drug dependency that can be created and how it leads
to harder drugs, or the cost implications that the drug dependency can have.
Your article suggested that authorities in charge of crowd control at the
next football match would have a problem because they have superior drug laws.
So come on, Editor, take the bull by the horns and stop printing pro-drug
legislation in the "Courier" without its harmful effects being included as
well.
Philip Solan, St Ives Gardens, Skircoat, Green Halifax
AS A parent and reader of the "Evening Courier" I wish to complain about
your recent misleading article ("Cannabis calmed fans", June 14).
I think you have a responsibility to ensure that all articles are properly
balanced and do not give the wrong impression; after all your circulation
does include a cross-section of the community, including many young people
who may well be currently undertaking examinations.
I found the article to be one sided, actually promoting cannabis as a ways
and means of successfully calming football fans, and suggesting that
legalised use of cannabis was a benefit.
It also made comparisons with alcohol, a classic way of putting forward
soft drugs as being "OK, man".
It did not mention the unknown health hazards that cannabis users are
submitting themselves to. Many users are seriously debilitated for the
rest of their lives.
Nor did it mention the drug dependency that can be created and how it leads
to harder drugs, or the cost implications that the drug dependency can have.
Your article suggested that authorities in charge of crowd control at the
next football match would have a problem because they have superior drug laws.
So come on, Editor, take the bull by the horns and stop printing pro-drug
legislation in the "Courier" without its harmful effects being included as
well.
Philip Solan, St Ives Gardens, Skircoat, Green Halifax
Member Comments |
No member comments available...