News (Media Awareness Project) - US AK: Column: Hemp Initiative Would Clear Up Current Muddle On |
Title: | US AK: Column: Hemp Initiative Would Clear Up Current Muddle On |
Published On: | 2000-07-04 |
Source: | Anchorage Daily News (AK) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-03 17:17:31 |
HEMP INITIATIVE WOULD CLEAR UP CURRENT MUDDLE ON MARIJUANA
Here's what the hempologists say.
Hemp is a miracle plant. It has many uses, among them clothing,
canvas, rope, paper and industrial oil. It used to be legal in the
United States. So did its close relative, marijuana. Both were
outlawed during the Reefer Madness insanity of the 1950s. Both are
still illegal because of the War on Drugs hypocrisy of today. There is
no good reason that hemp and marijuana should be illegal.
This is a very, very simplified version of their rap. It has thousands
of details. In Alaska, it has even more. A 1975 state Supreme Court
ruling said possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use
is legal. But in 1990, voters passed an initiative to recriminalize
it. But in 1998, voters passed an initiative making medical use legal.
So is personal use of marijuana in Alaska legal? Don't ask me. Ask a
lawyer. Or a judge. Or a jury.
Into the middle of this muddle stepped Al Anders. Anders is a burly,
gap-toothed, rolled-up-sleeves kind of guy who first encountered the
Libertarian philosophy in 1980.
"I was saved," he said. "I found my religion."
From then until now he has spent a lot of time circulating petitions
and trying to sign people up for the Libertarian Party. He saw a big
chunk of the country, including Alaska. Three years ago, he said, he
decided to move here for good.
"Many people come up here for the scenery, for the climate," he said.
"And I'm one of those, except I came up here for the political
climate. It's a freer place than the Lower 48."
But not quite free enough. So Anders revived a petition that hadn't
gotten enough signatures a few years earlier, and he set out to
legalize hemp in Alaska. He circulated petitions. So did volunteers
and some paid workers. They got enough signatures to put Ballot
Measure No. 5 before voters in November. Here, according to the
state's summary, is what the ballot measure would do:
"This bill would eliminate civil and criminal sanctions for the use of
marijuana and other hemp products for persons 18 years or older.
Doctors would be allowed to prescribe marijuana, and it would be
regulated like an alcoholic beverage. Amnesty would be given to those
convicted in the past of marijuana crimes. The bill allows for laws
limiting marijuana use in some cases to protect public safety. It
directs the state to challenge federal laws that conflict with the
terms of the bill. It creates an advisory panel to study restitution
for persons convicted in the past of marijuana crimes."
That would clear up the current muddle, all right. Along with a
cluster of other hempologists, Anders works out of a Spenard
storefront these days, trying to get it passed. They aren't alone.
"I've just been a longtime supporter of legalization, based on my own
experience that it is a fairly harmless drug," Tim Hinterberger said.
"Our government and others have looked into this over and over, and
the consensus is that marijuana is harmless."
You could dismiss Anders and the others as political malcontents or
potheads. Hinterberger is tougher to shrug off. A tall, elegant fellow
with a well-barbered beard, Hinterberger is a professor of
neuroscience and molecular biology at UAA. He says simply that in
claiming marijuana is a dangerous drug, "our government is not
following the scientific consensus."
There's a certain windmill-tilting aspect to the legalization
campaign. No matter what Alaska does, marijuana would still be illegal
under federal law. But it's not hard to figure out how to vote. I
can't see any reason to keep putting people in jail for something that
is, the statistics tell us, far less damaging to society than alcohol
or tobacco. Can you?
Here's what the hempologists say.
Hemp is a miracle plant. It has many uses, among them clothing,
canvas, rope, paper and industrial oil. It used to be legal in the
United States. So did its close relative, marijuana. Both were
outlawed during the Reefer Madness insanity of the 1950s. Both are
still illegal because of the War on Drugs hypocrisy of today. There is
no good reason that hemp and marijuana should be illegal.
This is a very, very simplified version of their rap. It has thousands
of details. In Alaska, it has even more. A 1975 state Supreme Court
ruling said possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use
is legal. But in 1990, voters passed an initiative to recriminalize
it. But in 1998, voters passed an initiative making medical use legal.
So is personal use of marijuana in Alaska legal? Don't ask me. Ask a
lawyer. Or a judge. Or a jury.
Into the middle of this muddle stepped Al Anders. Anders is a burly,
gap-toothed, rolled-up-sleeves kind of guy who first encountered the
Libertarian philosophy in 1980.
"I was saved," he said. "I found my religion."
From then until now he has spent a lot of time circulating petitions
and trying to sign people up for the Libertarian Party. He saw a big
chunk of the country, including Alaska. Three years ago, he said, he
decided to move here for good.
"Many people come up here for the scenery, for the climate," he said.
"And I'm one of those, except I came up here for the political
climate. It's a freer place than the Lower 48."
But not quite free enough. So Anders revived a petition that hadn't
gotten enough signatures a few years earlier, and he set out to
legalize hemp in Alaska. He circulated petitions. So did volunteers
and some paid workers. They got enough signatures to put Ballot
Measure No. 5 before voters in November. Here, according to the
state's summary, is what the ballot measure would do:
"This bill would eliminate civil and criminal sanctions for the use of
marijuana and other hemp products for persons 18 years or older.
Doctors would be allowed to prescribe marijuana, and it would be
regulated like an alcoholic beverage. Amnesty would be given to those
convicted in the past of marijuana crimes. The bill allows for laws
limiting marijuana use in some cases to protect public safety. It
directs the state to challenge federal laws that conflict with the
terms of the bill. It creates an advisory panel to study restitution
for persons convicted in the past of marijuana crimes."
That would clear up the current muddle, all right. Along with a
cluster of other hempologists, Anders works out of a Spenard
storefront these days, trying to get it passed. They aren't alone.
"I've just been a longtime supporter of legalization, based on my own
experience that it is a fairly harmless drug," Tim Hinterberger said.
"Our government and others have looked into this over and over, and
the consensus is that marijuana is harmless."
You could dismiss Anders and the others as political malcontents or
potheads. Hinterberger is tougher to shrug off. A tall, elegant fellow
with a well-barbered beard, Hinterberger is a professor of
neuroscience and molecular biology at UAA. He says simply that in
claiming marijuana is a dangerous drug, "our government is not
following the scientific consensus."
There's a certain windmill-tilting aspect to the legalization
campaign. No matter what Alaska does, marijuana would still be illegal
under federal law. But it's not hard to figure out how to vote. I
can't see any reason to keep putting people in jail for something that
is, the statistics tell us, far less damaging to society than alcohol
or tobacco. Can you?
Member Comments |
No member comments available...