News (Media Awareness Project) - US MA: Editorial: Why The Mandate? Governor Should Veto Budget |
Title: | US MA: Editorial: Why The Mandate? Governor Should Veto Budget |
Published On: | 2000-07-23 |
Source: | Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-03 14:34:18 |
WHY THE MANDATE? GOVERNOR SHOULD VETO BUDGET RIDER ON NEEDLES
Having persuaded only a few communities that handing out hypodermic
syringes to addicts is the proper way to combat AIDS, proponents now
hope to spread needle exchanges across the state by legislative fiat.
The budget rider -- tucked in among the hundreds of "outside sections"
attached to the fiscal 2001 budget -- should be vetoed.
Although AIDS activists have given top priority to establishing needle
exchanges, communities have balked. Only Boston, Cambridge,
Northampton and Provincetown have adopted the local option law. State
Sen. James P. Jajuga, D-Methuen, sponsor of the budget rider and an
avid crusader for needle exchange, couldn't persuade any of the
communities in his own district to sign on.
There is reason for caution. Although anti-addiction treatment and
education about the danger of needle-sharing have proved effective
against AIDS, the evidence that handing out syringes alone prevents
transmission of blood-borne diseases is unpersuasive.
Mindful of community skepticism, AIDS activists in Worcester have
developed a promising "harm and risk reduction" proposal that
emphasizes anti-addiction treatment and counseling. The
needle-exchange aspect would function, in part, as an inducement for
addicts to seek treatment and stick with it.
To be sure, any program that involves supplying addicts with the tools
of drug abuse, even peripherally, is likely to be a hard sell. The
harm and risk reduction model was rejected by the City Council last
year.
Given time for further consideration, however, thoughtful political
and neighborhood leaders may come to see the potential of a
clinic-based program that focuses on giving addicts the treatment they
need to get off drugs.
A heavy-handed mandate would only stiffen local resistance -- a point
underscored last month by the Worcester City Council's decisive 9-2
vote of opposition to the Jajuga bill.
The councilors were right to resist the usurpation of local control.
Gov. Paul Cellucci should use his veto pen to strike out the misguided
mandate.
Having persuaded only a few communities that handing out hypodermic
syringes to addicts is the proper way to combat AIDS, proponents now
hope to spread needle exchanges across the state by legislative fiat.
The budget rider -- tucked in among the hundreds of "outside sections"
attached to the fiscal 2001 budget -- should be vetoed.
Although AIDS activists have given top priority to establishing needle
exchanges, communities have balked. Only Boston, Cambridge,
Northampton and Provincetown have adopted the local option law. State
Sen. James P. Jajuga, D-Methuen, sponsor of the budget rider and an
avid crusader for needle exchange, couldn't persuade any of the
communities in his own district to sign on.
There is reason for caution. Although anti-addiction treatment and
education about the danger of needle-sharing have proved effective
against AIDS, the evidence that handing out syringes alone prevents
transmission of blood-borne diseases is unpersuasive.
Mindful of community skepticism, AIDS activists in Worcester have
developed a promising "harm and risk reduction" proposal that
emphasizes anti-addiction treatment and counseling. The
needle-exchange aspect would function, in part, as an inducement for
addicts to seek treatment and stick with it.
To be sure, any program that involves supplying addicts with the tools
of drug abuse, even peripherally, is likely to be a hard sell. The
harm and risk reduction model was rejected by the City Council last
year.
Given time for further consideration, however, thoughtful political
and neighborhood leaders may come to see the potential of a
clinic-based program that focuses on giving addicts the treatment they
need to get off drugs.
A heavy-handed mandate would only stiffen local resistance -- a point
underscored last month by the Worcester City Council's decisive 9-2
vote of opposition to the Jajuga bill.
The councilors were right to resist the usurpation of local control.
Gov. Paul Cellucci should use his veto pen to strike out the misguided
mandate.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...