Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Web: Federal Court In California Hears Arguments On Medicinal Use
Title:US: Web: Federal Court In California Hears Arguments On Medicinal Use
Published On:2000-08-03
Source:CNN.com (US Web)
Fetched On:2008-09-03 13:50:17
FEDERAL COURT IN CALIFORNIA HEARS ARGUMENTS ON MEDICINAL USE OF MARIJUANA

Case Pits Doctor Against Feds

SAN FRANCISCO (CNN) -- A federal judge is pondering arguments over
California's voter-approved law that allows very sick patients under a
doctor's care to use marijuana for medical purposes.

Although the state law was passed in 1996, marijuana remains illegal under
federal law, and federal authorities have threatened that a doctor who even
suggests marijuana use to a patient could lose his license.

"That means that a patient walks into my exam room, and I close the door,
and I tell them something that the government objects to, they can take away
my right to make a living, they can take away my right to practice medicine,
they can take away my right to tell you what I honestly believe is true,"
said Dr. Marcus Conant of San Francisco.

No doctor yet has had his or her license revoked, but the threat remains.

Federal prosecutors are especially nervous about pro-marijuana opinions that
conflict with federal law, especially when those opinions come from so
respected a source as the family doctor.

ACLU Enters The Fight

But Conant, supported by the American Civil Liberties Union, argues the
federal prohibition is censorship, and he sued in federal district court.

"They do not want doctors talking about marijuana to their patients at all,"
said Graham Boyd of the ACLU. "And they're willing to use federal power to
try to censor, to stifle physicians."

In hearings Thursday, Justice Department attorney Joseph Lobue argued that
federal law against marijuana should prevail.

"There is a national standard here," he said, arguing that using marijuana
should not be up to a single physician.

Federal Judge William Alsup seemed unbelieving. "Who better," asked the
judge, "to decide the health of a patient, than a doctor."

The California Medical Association agrees, saying in January that "A
desperate patient with the advice of his or her physician must be able to
explore all potential courses of treatment."

Alsup's ruling, expected in several weeks, will affect several other states
that have approved similar medicinal marijuana measures, including Alaska,
Arizona, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.

Long Legal Fight Expected

A California patient needing marijuana would go to a marijuana organization
in Oakland, which is also fighting in federal court to stay open.

"I'm very disappointed and disheartened by our government being so
indifferent to people who are sick and dying," said Jeff Jones of the
Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative.

Both sides of the debate agree on one thing: The issue will likely wind up
in the Supreme Court.
Member Comments
No member comments available...