News (Media Awareness Project) - US HI: LTE: Unconstitutional For All? |
Title: | US HI: LTE: Unconstitutional For All? |
Published On: | 2007-11-22 |
Source: | Garden Island (Lihue, HI) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-11 18:05:19 |
UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR ALL?
The teachers union voted for a raise and random drug testing. Now
they're saying "Oh no, we only wanted the raise."
Give me a break.
These are the people that are with the children, our future, six hours
a day.
How many teachers were arrested on drug charges this year
alone?
Why is it that the ACLU says it is a violation of the teachers'
constitutional rights?
Why is it not a violation of all employees' constitutional
rights?
Why only public or union employees?
My understanding is that private businesses with more than 50
employees cannot get workman's comp insurance without drug testing.
Why is it different for the teachers union?
Who do they buy their workman's comp from?
Come on ACLU, how can it be unconstitutional for only one privileged
group?
Why not everybody?
What's unconstitutional for one should be unconstitutional for
all.
Tom Leighton,
Kapa'a
The teachers union voted for a raise and random drug testing. Now
they're saying "Oh no, we only wanted the raise."
Give me a break.
These are the people that are with the children, our future, six hours
a day.
How many teachers were arrested on drug charges this year
alone?
Why is it that the ACLU says it is a violation of the teachers'
constitutional rights?
Why is it not a violation of all employees' constitutional
rights?
Why only public or union employees?
My understanding is that private businesses with more than 50
employees cannot get workman's comp insurance without drug testing.
Why is it different for the teachers union?
Who do they buy their workman's comp from?
Come on ACLU, how can it be unconstitutional for only one privileged
group?
Why not everybody?
What's unconstitutional for one should be unconstitutional for
all.
Tom Leighton,
Kapa'a
Member Comments |
No member comments available...