Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Column: Protecting Society From Criminals, Bad Cops, And Inhumane Prisons
Title:US CA: Column: Protecting Society From Criminals, Bad Cops, And Inhumane Prisons
Published On:2000-08-24
Source:Point Reyes Light (CA)
Fetched On:2008-09-03 11:27:50
PROTECTING SOCIETY FROM CRIMINALS, BAD COPS, AND INHUMANE PRISONS

For high school graduates with no special talents - except a propensity
for not taking guff from nuts and troublemakers - there are few jobs
that pay as well as being a prison guard for the California Department
of Corrections.

The state provides the necessary training and then puts you on the
payroll at $31,200 per year, which climbs steadily to $42,400 - unless,
of course, you get a promotion. Nor is that the full amount of
compensation since it doesn't include such benefits as health
insurance.

Such salaries help explain why state prison guards are in the forefront
of the War on Drugs, at least in California. As the Aug. 28 Newsweek
noted, "The California Correctional Peace Officers Association, the
prison guards' union,...has made building more prisons its signature
issue. The union pumped more than $2 million into the 1998 campaign of
Gov. Gray Davis, a tough-on-crime Democrat, who quickly signed
legislation authorizing $525 million in new prison construction."

A dramatic example of the union's strength just occurred when the
Wackenhut corporation completed a private prison in California City,
Kern County. Fearing this could create an opening for non-union guards,
the Peace Officers Association managed to stop the state from
contracting to use the prison. In response, Wackenhut signed a contract
with the federal government to house criminal aliens in the prison, and
the state is now considering a proposal to spend $3 billion in public
funds to build a 5,160-bed prison near Bakersfield.

Because of California's confused obsession with law and order during
the past 20 years, our prison population quadrupled to 2 million
inmates. We now have a higher percentage of our population behind bars
than any other state or virtually any foreign country. The last time I
checked, the computerized court-record system in neighboring San
Francisco alone was tracking roughly 90,000 people, who were in jail or
in prison, on probation or on parole, on trial or waiting to be tried.
That's more than 10 percent of the city's population.

Contributing greatly to our growing population of inmates have been the
anti-parole policies of Governors Pete Wilson and Gray Davis. It would
appear that both have tried to hide their pantywaists by making a show
of being "tough on crime." These two mincing little men would have been
better cast for the chorus line of the now-closed Finocchio Club; like
most of the former dancers, both are straight but like wearing
bouffants and establishing authority with waspish repartees.

During their terms, these two governors have treated "10 years to life"
and similar sentences as if the words meant "life without the
possibility of parole." In the past 20 years, no matter how well a term-
to-life prisoner behaved or how important he was to his family on the
outside, his chances of ever receiving parole dropped from 48 percent
to 0.2 percent.

And what is happening to the other people who are incarcerated? Are
they being rehabilitated so they will become productive citizens when
they're finally released? One thing we know is happening is that
roughly 300,000 men are raped in jails each year and another 200,000
are raped in prisons. Unbelievably, 18 percent of the rapes in men's
prisons nationwide are carried out by correctional officers.

For additional estimates, including very limited statistics on the
sexual abuse of women in prison, check
(http://www.spr.org/docs/stats.html) on the web.

Since the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits "cruel and
unusual punishments," how can judges rationalize sentencing a defendant
to being raped? This is not just an intellectual question. A few years
back, one Marin County judge confided to me that it always upset him to
send effeminate young men to state prison, knowing what would happen to
them, but that didn't stop him from doing it.

In fact, the entire criminal-justice system is riddled with cruel
ironies. The late Marin Sheriff's Captain Art Disterheft, who began his
career in the Los Angeles Sheriff's Office, used to say that when he
saw classmates who had been punks in his high school, he noticed that
half of them had ended up in jail and the other half in law
enforcement.

Maybe we shouldn't be surprised by that. Convicts and cops tend to
share the same swagger and the same code of silence; most won't "rat"
on a fellow cop/criminal, no matter what he did.

At least in prison, keeping your mouth shut can be a matter of life and
death. But the willingness of police to cover up criminal activity by
other officers is more a matter of solidarity and far more heinous.
During the past three years, revelations of crimes by police have
ranged from two New York officers in Brooklyn sodomizing a Haitian
immigrant with a broomstick to 30 policemen in Los Angeles' Rampart
Division caught lying under oath, planting evidence on suspected gang
members, beating suspects, and framing and shooting innocent civilians.
Were it not for a couple of officers trying to keep themselves out of
prison, none of these crimes would have ever become public.

One way the Marin County Sheriff's Department, intentionally or not,
reduces the tendency of new deputies to swagger is to assign them first
to the jail, where they spend their shifts locked up with inmates. To a
new deputy, this is usually scary, and he learns, as a deputy once told
me, "You can't trust [inmates], and you can't turn your back on them,
but you have to show them respect if you want to be respected
yourself."

Like zookeepers, jailers need to be respected by their charges. If
they're not, inmates have their own ways of retaliating. At worst, some
- - like apes in a cage - will throw their feces in the faces of
tormentors, a crime that in prison is called "gassing."

Gassing is so "prevalent" (both state and county officials on Tuesday
repeatedly used the word) that the Legislature a year or so ago created
a specific statute to deal with it. The Legislature also ordered
prisons to keep a list of gassings and to report what was done to make
sure diseases such as hepatitis or tuberculosis were not transmitted.
In short, our nationwide criminal-justice system has become a level of
hell that even Dante could not imagine.

For the past four weeks, The Light has been publishing a series on the
current state of criminal justice in Marin County, California, and the
US. This week, we are publishing the final installment. It has been our
hope that the series would serve three primary purposes:

We wanted to educate readers about the strengths and weaknesses of
their criminal-justice system and to give them an overview of how it
works.

We wanted to remind law enforcement, elected officials, and
correctional institutions that we are watching them. Because a criminal-
justice system has the potential to abuse people in horrible ways, we
wanted to make sure everyone knows this paper stands ready to defend
victims when the system malfunctions and to recognize heroes when it
works well.

Finally, we hoped to create an historical record that researchers
decades from now can use to see what the state of law enforcement was
in Marin County in the year 2000.
Member Comments
No member comments available...