Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Justices Deal Setback To Medicinal Pot Use
Title:US CA: Justices Deal Setback To Medicinal Pot Use
Published On:2000-08-30
Source:Arizona Daily Star (AZ)
Fetched On:2008-09-03 10:37:49
JUSTICES DEAL SETBACK TO MEDICINAL POT USE

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court yesterday barred distribution of marijuana
to people in California whose doctors recommend it for medicinal purposes.

The court, voting 7-1 to grant an emergency Clinton administration request,
postponed the effect of federal court rulings that would have allowed a
California club to distribute the illegal drug for medicinal use.

Government lawyers had sought emergency help from Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor, who referred the request to the full court.

Only Justice John Paul Stevens dissented. He said the government "has
failed to demonstrate that the denial of necessary medicine to seriously
ill and dying patients will advance the public interest or that the failure
to enjoin the distribution of such medicine will impair the orderly
enforcement of federal criminal statutes."

Justice Stephen G. Breyer disqualified himself from the case. His brother,
Charles, a federal trial judge in San Francisco, previously had barred
distribution of marijuana only to have his decision reversed by a federal
appeals court.

The highest court's action, which came in a brief order, was the latest
development in a conflict between federal narcotics laws and a 1996
California voters' initiative known as Proposition 215.

The state initiative allows seriously ill patients to grow and use
marijuana for pain relief, with a doctor's recommendation, without state
penalties. But federal law says marijuana has no medical purposes and
cannot be administered safely under medical supervision.

Initiatives similar to California's have been passed in Alaska, Arizona,
Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington state.

In the California case, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that
"medical necessity" is a "legally cognizable defense" to a charge of
distributing drugs in violation of a federal law, the Controlled Substances
Act.

Because of that ruling, Judge Charles Breyer said the Oakland Cannabis
Buyers' Cooperative could provide marijuana to people facing imminent harm
from serious medical conditions and for whom legal alternatives to
marijuana do not work or cause intolerable side effects.
Member Comments
No member comments available...